The Zombie Body of Linear Perspective Vision

  • Brent Dean Robbins


Time is examined for its implications for an equally radical transformation in the conception and experience of space and place. The emergence of the linear perspective technique in Renaissance art, as developed by Brunelleschi and Alberti, is systematically examined as a cultural artifact that uniquely discloses a qualitative shift in the perception of spatiality, which in turn implies a transformation of lived embodiment. The lived embodiment of a culture informed by linear perspective vision is found to reflect the medical body of the cadaver, whose memorial body has been neglected and suppressed through a process of clinical detachment, expressed through an objectivist epistemology. The cultural myth of the zombie is analyzed as a shadow of the neglected memorial body and suppressed lived body.


  1. Adam, B. (2003). Reflexive modernization temporalized. Theory, Culture, & Society, 20(2), 59–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alberti, L. B. (1956). On painting (J. R. Spencer, Trans.). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  3. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  4. Bishop, K. W. (2011). American zombie gothic: The rise and fall (and rise) of the walking dead in popular culture. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company Inc.Google Scholar
  5. Bishop, K. W. (2015). How zombies conquered popular culture. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company Inc.Google Scholar
  6. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (2009). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. New York: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  7. Edgerton, S. Y. (1975). The renaissance rediscovery of linear perspective. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  8. Field, J. V. (1997). The invention of infinity: Mathematics and art in the Renaissance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Freguglia, P. (2009). Reflections on the relationship between perspective and geometry in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. Nexus Network Journal, 11, 331–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harries, K. (2001). Infinity and perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hvidsten, M. (2016). Exploring geometry (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kemp, M. (1990). Filippo Brunelleschi: The early works and the Medieval tradition. London: Academy Editions.Google Scholar
  13. Koyré, A. (1968). From the closed world to the infinite universe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Lynch, M. (1997). Scientific practice and ordinary action: Ethnomethodology and social studies in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Romanyshyn, R. D. (1989). Technology as symptom and dream. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Siegfried, L. J. (2011). The art of seeing in perspective: How Medieval optical science transformed into Renaissance painting (Master’s thesis). University of California, Riverside.Google Scholar
  17. Van den Berg, J. H. (1978). Medical power and medical ethics. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  18. Weller, P. F. (2014). Alberti before Florence: Early sources informing Leon Battista Alberti’s De Pictura (Doctoral dissertation). University of California, Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  19. Wiltsche, H. A. (2017). Mechanics lost: Husserl’s Galileo and Ihde’s telescope. Husserl Studies, 33(2), 149–173. Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyPoint Park UniversityPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations