Skip to main content

Historical Expert Commissions and Their Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History After 1945

Abstract

Though calling on historians and other experts to re-examine the past in order to resolve current political disputes has become increasingly popular among political leaders, historical expert commissions (HEC) remain a relatively under-conceptualized phenomenon in current scholarship. This chapter therefore starts with suggesting ways in which we might study this mechanism of state-sponsored history in a more conceptually informed and systematic way. A basic framework is developed that sorts HECs along historical situations and basic organizational features, providing the backdrop for a discussion of cases from around the globe. Particular attention is paid to the complex interactions between historical experts and “the state” during different stages of an HEC’s operation. The chapter ends with preliminary reflections on how to assess such commissions’ impact.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alsema, A. (2015) ‘Historic Commission Releases Report on Causes of Colombia Conflict.’ Colombia Reports, 11 February 2015, available at: http://colombiareports.com/historic-commission-releases-report-causes-colombia-conflict/. Accessed February 2016.

  • Assmann, A. (2008) ‘Transformations between History and Memory’, Social Research, 75(1), 49–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakiner, O. (2015) Truth Commissions. Memory, Power, and Legitimacy (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, E. (2000) The Guilt of Nations. Restitution and Negotiating Historical Injustice (New York: Norton).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, E. (2005) ‘Engaging History. Managing Conflict and Reconciliation’, History Workshop Journal, 59, 229–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, E. (2009) ‘Historians and Historical Reconciliation’, American Historical Review, 114(4), 899–913.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkan, E. (2016) ‘Memories of Violence. Micro and Macro History and the Challenges to Peacebuilding in Colombia and Northern Ireland’, Irish Political Studies, 31(1), 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beattie, A. H. (2008) Playing Politics with History. The Bundestag Inquiries into East Germany (Oxford: Berghahn Books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, M. (1998) ‘Im Spannungsfeld von Politik und Zeitgeschichte. Das Großforschungs-projekt, Dokumentation der Vertreibung der Deutschen aus Ost-Mitteleuropa’, Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 46(3), 345–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bevernage, B. (2011) ‘History by Parliamentary Vote. Science, Ethics and Politics in the Lumumba Commission’, History Compass, 9(4), 300–311.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüggemann, K. (2007) ‘Review of ‘Estonia 1940–1945. Reports of the Estonian International Commission for the Investigation of Crimes Against Humanity,” Zeitschrift für Ostmitteleuropa-Forschung, 56(3), 460–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaruzza, M. and Zala, S. (2007) ‘Negotiated history? Bilateral historical commissions in twentieth-century Europe’ in: H. Jones, K. Ostberg and N. Randeraad (eds.) Contemporary history on trial. Europe since 1989 and the role of the expert historian (Manchester: Manchester University Press), pp. 123–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, B. and Watson, A. M. S. (2015) ‘Examining the Potential for an American Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, Carnegie Ethics Online, 5 February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delpla, I., Bougarel, X. and Fournel J.-L. (eds.) (2012) Investigating Srebrenica. Institutions, Fact, Responsibilities (Oxford: Berghahn books).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ericsson, K. and Simonsen, E. (eds.) (2005) Children of World War II. The Hidden Enemy Legacy (New York: Berg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Faure, R. (2015) Netzwerke der Kulturdiplomatie. Die internationale Schulbuchrevision in Europa, 1945–1989 (Oldenbourg: De Gruyter).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, C. (2005) ‘A New Historian?’, Contemporary European History, 14(1), 135–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner-Feldman, L. (2010a) Germany’s Foreign Policy of Reconciliation. From Enmity to Amity (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner-Feldman. L. (2010b) ‘German-Polish Reconciliation in Comparative Perspective: Lessons for Japan?’, The Asia-Pacific Journal, April 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guth, S. (2009) ‘Erzwungene Verständigung? Die Kommission der Historiker der DDR und der Volksrepublik Polen 1956–1990’, Vierteljahreshefte für Zeitgeschichte, 57(4), 497–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayner, P. B. (1996) ‘Commissioning the Truth. Further Research Questions’, Third World Quarterly, 17(1), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, M. (2012) ‘A Carnival of Truth? Knowledge, Ignorance and the Canadian Truth and Reconciliation Commission’, International Journal of Tranistional Justice, 6(2), 182–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karn, A. (2006) ‘Depolarizing the Past. The Role of Historical Commissions in Conflict Mediation and Reconciliation’, Journal of International Affairs, 60(1), 31–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karn, A. (2015) Amending the Past. Europe’s Holocaust Commissions and the Right to History (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzio, T. (2002) Ukrainian–Russian Historical Commission Raises Storm. RFERL (Poland, Belarus, Ukraine Report), 4(26), 2 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagrou, P. (2003) ‘Het Srebrenica-rapport en de geschiedenis van het heden’ Low Countries Historical Review, 118(3), 325–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier, C. (2000) ‘Doing History, Doing Justice. The Narrative of the Historian and of the Truth Commission’ in R.I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.) Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton: Princeton University Press), pp. 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, M. T., Kitano, H. H. L. and Berthold, S. M. (1999) Achieving the Impossible Dream. How Japanese Americans Obtained Redress (Urbana: University of Illinois Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchetti, E. (2005) ‘Critical Reflections Upon Australia’s Royal Commission into Aboriginal Deaths in Custody’, Macquarie Law Journal, 5, 103–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, E. (2013) ‘Spaniards want truth on Franco’s crimes’, The Volunteer, 14 September 2013, available at: http://www.albavolunteer.org/2013/09/spaniards-call-for-truth-commission-on-francos-crimes/. Accessed September 2016.

  • Pettai, E.-C. (2011) ‘Convergence of Two World. Historians and Emerging History in the Baltic States’ in M. Housden and D. J. Smith (eds.) Forgotten Pages in Baltic History. Themes of Diversity and Inclusion (Amsterdam: Rodopi), pp. 263–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettai, E.-C. (2015a) ‘Interactions between History and Memory. Historical Commission and Reconciliation’ in S. Kattago (ed.) The Ashgate Research Companion in Memory Studies (London: Ashgate), pp. 237–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettai, E.-C. (2015b) ‘Negotiating History for Reconciliation. A Comparative Evaluation of Baltic Presidential Commissions’, Europe–Asia Studies, 67(7), 1079–1101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettai, E.-C. and Pettai, V. (2015) Transitional and Retrospective Justice in the Baltic States (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingel, F. (2010) UNESCO Guidebook on Textbook Research and Textbook Revision 2nd ed. Braunschweig: Georg Eckert Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plakans, A. (2016) ‘History, the Remembered Past and Master Narratives: The case of Latvia’ in M. Ilic and D. Leinarte (eds.) The Soviet Past in the post-Socialist Present. Methodology and Ethics in Russian, Baltic and Central European Oral History and memory Studies (New York: Routledge), pp. 129–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotfeld, A. D. and Torkunov, A. V. (eds.) (2015) White Spots–Black Spots. Difficult Matters in Polish-Russian Relations 1918–2008 (Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruchniewicz, K. (2015) ‘Why We Still Need Textbook Commissions?’, Public History Weekly, The Multilingual Blogjournal, 3(12).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz, M. (2009) ‘Kann man komplexe transnationale Kollektive beschreiben, ohne unzulässig die Komplexität zu reduzieren? Einige Anregungen zu einem neuen Modell zur Kollektivbeschreibung’, Interculture Journal, 8(8), 59–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stan, L. (2009) ‘Truth Commissions in Post-Communism. The Overlooked Solution?’, The Open Political Science Journal, 2, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suny, R. G. (2009) ‘Truth in Telling. Reconciling Realities in the Genocide of the Ottoman Armenians’, American Historical Review, 14(4), 930–946.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sužiedelis, S. (2014) ‘The International Commission for the Evaluation of the Crimes of the Nazi and Soviet Occupation Regimes in Lithuania. Successes, Challenges, Perspectives’, Journal of Baltic Studies, doi: 10.1080/01629778.2014.937906.

  • Torpey, J. (2006) Making Whole What Has Been Smashed. On Reparations Politics (Cambridge: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Truth and Reconciliation Commission of Canada (2015) Final report, available at: http://www.trc.ca/websites/trcinstitution/index.php?p=890. Accessed 5 December 2016.

  • United States Institute of Peace (2012) ‘Truth Commission: Mauritius’ Available at: http://www.usip.org/publications/truth-commission-mauritius. Accessed September 2016.

  • Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2010) Truth Commission in Transitional Societies. The Impact on Human Rights and Democracy (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

Recommended Readings

  • Berg, M. and Schaefer, B. (eds.) (2009) Historical Justice in International Perspective. How Societies are Trying to Right the Wrongs of the Past (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Budryte, D. (2013) ‘International Commission for the Evaluation of the Crimes of the Nazi and Soviet Occupation Regimes in Lithuania’, in L. Stan and N. Nedelsky, (eds.) Encyclopedia of Transitional Justice, Vol. 3, pp. 218–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bustin, E. (2002) ‘Remembrance of sins past: unraveling the murder of Patrice Lumumba’, Review of African Political Economy, 29(93/94), 537–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciobanu, M. (2008) ‘Criminalising the Past and Reconstructing Collective Memory: The Romanian Truth Commission’. Europe—Asia Studies, 61(2), 313–336.

    Google Scholar 

  • Defrance, C. and Pfeil, Ul. (2011) Eine Nachkriegsgeschichte in Europa 1945 bis 1963. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft (WBG Deutsch-Französische Geschichte, Bd. 10.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnstone, G. and Quirk, J. (eds.) (2012) ‘Repairing Historical Wrongs’, Social & Legal Studies, 21(2). [Special Issue].

    Google Scholar 

  • Little, A. and Maddison, S. (eds.) (2017) ‘Reconciliation, Transformation, Struggle’ International Political Science Review, 38(2). [Special issue].

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludi, R. (2012) Reparations for Nazi Victims in Postwar Europe (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ludi, R. and Dreyfus, J.-M. (2001) ‘Historians as political trouble-shooters: Officially Commissioned Surveys of Holocaust Legacies in France and Switzerland’, Center for European Studies Working Paper Series, No. 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maoz, A. (2000) ‘Historical Adjudication. Courts of Law, Commissions of Inquiry, and “Historical Truth”’, Law and History Review, 18(3), 559–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrattan, C. (2014) ‘Policing Politics. Framing the Past in Post-conflict Divided Societies’, Democratization, 21(3), 389–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. and Lipman, M. (eds.) (2012) The Convolutions of Historical Politics (Budapest: CEU Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pingel, F. (2008) ‘Can Truth Be Negotiated? History Textbook Revision as a Means to Reconciliation’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 617 (March).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathkolb, O. (2000) ‘Die späte Wahrheitssuche. Historikerkommissionen in Europa’, Historische Anthropologie, 8(3), 445–453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torpey, J. (ed.) (2003) Politics and the Past. On Repairing Historical Injustice (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield).

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. and Okano-Heijmans, M. (2011) ‘Overcoming the Past in Sino-Japanese Relations?’, The International Spektator, 46(1) 127–148.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pettai, EC. (2018). Historical Expert Commissions and Their Politics. In: Bevernage, B., Wouters, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History After 1945. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95306-6_37

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95306-6_37

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95305-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95306-6

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics