Abstract
This chapter investigates the sources of variation in truth commissions’ historical narratives. Contrasting Chile’s 1990 National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation and 2003 National Commission on Political Imprisonment and Torture, it examines the social and political determinants of writing history through truth commissions. Chile’s 2003 commission has been much more daring in its portrayal of the military coup as a morally and politically questionable act. Whereas the 1990 Commission blends in sensitivity towards human rights with a right-leaning historiography that blamed the coup’s onset on the political crisis during the socialist Allende government (1970–1973), the latter Commission refuses to make rhetorical concessions to the right-wing narrative. What explains this fundamental difference in historiography? Pinochet’s 1998 arrest in London weakened the conservative grip on Chile’s politics and state-sponsored historiography, however, other forces were also at play: long-standing activism on the part of left-wing historians, the intergenerational transformation of memory struggles, and the election of a socialist-dominated government in 2000 were all crucial causal factors.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bakiner, O. (2010) ‘From Denial to Reluctant Dialogue. The Chilean Military’s Confrontation with Human Rights (1990–2006),’ International Journal of Transitional Justice, 4(1), 47–66.
Bakiner, O. (2014) ‘Truth Commission Impact. An Assessment of How Commissions Influence Politics and Society,’ International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(1), 6–30.
Bakiner, O. (2015) ‘One Truth Among Others? Truth Commissions’ Struggle for Truth and Memory,’ Memory Studies, 8(3), 345–360.
Bevernage, B. (2010) ‘Writing the Past out of the Present. History and the Politics of Time in Transitional Justice,’ History Workshop Journal, 69(1), 111–131.
Brahm, E. (2009) ‘What is a Truth Commission and Why Does it Matter?’, Peace and Conflict Review, 3(2), 1–14.
Centro de Ética (2005) Universidad Alberto Hurtado, s.d. “¡Nunca Olvidar! ¡Jamás Repetir!”, Informe Ethos, No. 39.
Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation (1993) Report of the Chilean National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation, Volume I (Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press). Available at: http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/resources/collections/truth_commissions/Chile90-Report/Chile90-Report.pdf.
Comisión Nacional sobre Prisión Política y Tortura (2004) Informe de la Comisión Nacional sobre Prisión Política y Tortura (Santiago: Ministerio Secretaría General de Gobierno).
Constable, P. and Valenzuela, A. (1991) A Nation of Enemies. Chile Under Pinochet (New York: W.W. Norton & Company).
Díaz Gallardo, J. L. (1999) ‘Mesa de diálogo. ¿vía chilena de solución a las violaciones a los Derechos Humanos?’, Fasoc, 14(3).
El Mercurio (2001) ‘Realizan balance a 10 años de Informe Rettig,’ El Mercurio, March 3.
Ensalaco, M. (2000) Chile Under Pinochet (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).
Galak, O. (2006) ‘Controversia por el prólogo agregado al informe ‘Nunca más’: Rechaza la teoría de los dos demonios,’ La Nación, May 19.
Grandin, G. (2005) ‘The Instruction of Great Catastrophe. Truth Commissions, National History, and State Formation in Argentina, Chile, and Guatemala,’ American Historical Review, 110(1), 46–67.
Hayner, P. B. (2011) Unspeakable Truths. Confronting State Terror and Atrocity (New York: Routledge).
Huneeus, C. (2007) The Pinochet Regime (Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers).
La Tercera (2004) ‘El fin de una visión,’ La Tercera, May 11.
Loveman, B. and Elizabeth L. (2002) El espejismo de la reconciliación política. Chile 1990–2002 (Santiago: LOM Ediciones).
Loveman, M. (1998) ‘High-Risk Collective Action. Defending Human Rights in Chile, Uruguay, and Argentina,’ American Journal of Sociology, 104(2), 477–525.
Madariaga, C. (2005) ‘El Informe Valech, otra tarea a medio terminar,’ Revista Reflexión 31, 4–8.
Maier, C. S. (2000) ‘Doing History, Doing Justice. The Narrative of the Historian and of the Truth Commission’ in R. I. Rotberg and D. Thompson (eds.) Truth v. Justice. The Morality of Truth Commissions (Princeton: Princeton University Press).
Mamdani, M. (2002) ‘Amnesty or Impunity? A Preliminary Critique of the Report of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission of South Africa,’ Diacritics, 32(3/4), 33–59.
Moon, C. (2008) Narrating Political Reconciliation. South Africa’s Truth and Reconciliation Commission (Maryland: Lexington Books).
Payne, L. A. (2008) Unsettling Accounts. Neither Truth nor Reconciliation in Confessions of State Violence (Durham: Duke University Press).
Roht-Arriaza, N. (2005) The Pinochet Effect. Transnational Justice in the Age of Human Rights (University of Pennsylvania Press).
Roniger, L. and Sznajder, M. (1999) The Legacy of Human Rights Violations in the Southern Cone. Argentina, Chile, and Uruguay (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Silva, P. (2002) ‘Searching for Civilian Supremacy. The Concertación Governments and the Military in Chile,’ Bulletin of Latin American Research, 21(3), 375–395.
Stern, S. J. (2010) Reckoning with Pinochet. The Memory Question in Democratic Chile, 1989–2006 (Durham: Duke University Press).
Vial, G. (2004) ‘Especial de Gonzalo Vial sobre el Informe de la Tortura (I). Su valor probatorio para una convicción moral,’ La Segunda, December 1.
Wiebelhaus-Brahm, E. (2009) Truth Commissions and Transitional Societies. The Impact on Human Rights and Democracy (New York: Routledge).
Wilson, R. A. (2011) Writing History in International Criminal Trials (New York: Cambridge University Press).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bakiner, O. (2018). Truths of the Dictatorship: Chile’s Rettig and Valech Commissions as State-Sponsored History. In: Bevernage, B., Wouters, N. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of State-Sponsored History After 1945. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95306-6_36
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95306-6_36
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95305-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95306-6
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)