Abstract
This chapter is concerned with understanding how young people live religion, culture, and sexuality between home and school. It describes how Chana, a 16-year-old Muslim woman, makes sense of meanings about sexuality from her African family and school-based sexuality education. The chapter rethinks dominant framings of this experience, where youth from religious and cultural minorities are caught between conflicting sexual ideologies from home and school. Instead of reinscribing this scene, its terms of reference are shifted by drawing on Barad’s (Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Duke University Press, 2007) notion of intra-activity to understand it in an ontologically different way. In an attempt at ‘exorbitant deconstruction’ (Lenz Taguchi, Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 41–53, 2010), the idea that meanings from home and school are necessarily oppositional and something Chana must reconcile/negotiate is unravelled, opening space for new ways of thinking.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alaimo, S. (2011). New materialisms, old humanisms, or, following the submersible. NORA Nordic Journal of Feminist and Gender Research, 19(4), 280–284.
Allen, L. (2011). Picture this: Using photo-methods in research on sexualities and schooling. Qualitative Research, 5(11), 487–504.
Barad, K. (1999). Agential realism: Feminist interventions in understanding scientific practices. In M. Biagioli (Ed.), The science studies reader (pp. 1–11). New York: Routledge.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durhman, NC: Duke University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Blaise, M. (2013). Activating micropolitical practices in the early years: (Re)assembling bodies and participant observations. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 184–200). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
DeLanda, M. (2002). Intensive science and virtual philosophy. London: Continuum.
Ellsworth, E. (1989). Why doesn’t this feel empowering? Working through the repressive myths of critical pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 59(3), 297–325.
Halstead, M. (2005). Islam, homophobia and education: A reply to Michael Merry. Journal of Moral Education, 34(1), 37–42.
Hendrickx, K., Lodewijckx, E., Van Royen, P., & Denekens, J. (2002). Sexual behaviour of second generation Moroccan immigrants balancing between traditional attitudes and safe sex. Patient Education and Counseling, 47, 89–94.
Hird, M. (2009). Feminist engagements with matter. Feminist Studies, 35, 329–346.
Hoskins, T., & Jones, A. (2013). Object lessons: Vital materiality, methodology and indigenous studies in education. Te Puna Wānanga Research Seminar 2013, October 31. Faculty of Education, University of Auckland. Epsom Campus.
Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.
Imtoual, A., & Hussein, S. (2009). Challenging the myth of the happy celibate: Muslim women negotiating contemporary relationships. Contemporary Islam, 3, 25–39.
Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Doing collaborative deconstruction as an ‘exorbitant’ strategy in qualitative research. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 41–53.
Lenz Taguchi, H. (2012). A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory, 13(3), 265–281.
MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.
Orgocka, A. (2004). Perceptions of communication and education about sexuality among Muslim immigrant girls in the US. Sex Education, 4(3), 255–271.
Page, S., & Yip, A. (2012). Religious young adults recounting the past: Narrating sexual and religious cultures in school. Journal of Beliefs and Values, 33(3), 405–415.
Rasmussen, M. (2012). Pleasure/Desire, sexularism and sexuality education. Sex Education, 12(4), 469–481.
Sanjakdar, F. (2014). Sacred pleasure: Exploring dimensions of sexual pleasure and desire from an Islamic perspective. In L. Allen, M. Rasmussen, & K. Quinlivan (Eds.), The politics of pleasure in sexuality education: Pleasure bound (pp. 95–114). New York: Routledge.
Smerecnik, C., Schaalma, H., Gerjo, K., Meijer, S., & Poleman, J. (2010). An exploratory study of Muslim adolescents’ views on sexuality: Implications for sex education and prevention. BMC Public Health, 10(533), 1–10.
Taylor, C., & Ivinson, G. (2013). Material feminisms: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25(6), 665–670.
Yip, A., & Page, S. (2013). Religious and sexual identities: A multi-faith exploration of young adults. Surrey: Ashgate.
Zain Al-Dien, M. (2010). Perceptions of sex education among Muslim adolescents in Canada. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs, 30(3), 391–407.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Allen, L. (2018). Learning About Sexuality ‘Between’ Home and School. In: Sexuality Education and New Materialism. Queer Studies and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95300-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95300-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95299-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95300-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)