Advertisement

New Materialism: An Experiment in Queer Thinking

  • Louisa Allen
Chapter
Part of the Queer Studies and Education book series (QSTED)

Abstract

This chapter establishes the conceptual underpinnings of the book, providing an explanation of new materialism, queer theory, and their relationship. It also charts the theoretical relationship between post-humanism, feminism, and new materialism. As well as explaining how this book is both new materialist and queer, the chapter highlights how Barad (Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning, Duke University Press, 2007) takes up the concept of queer in her work on agential realism. In addition, it begins to map the way new materialist thought around the concept of intra-action can be used think-with the concept of sexuality and the curriculum area of sexuality education. For those new to the theories outlined here, the aim is to provide an accessible introduction, while also extending elements of them.

References

  1. Alaimo, S. (2014). Thinking as the stuff of the world. O-Zone: A Journal of Object-Oriented Studies, 1(1), 13–21.Google Scholar
  2. Allen, L. (2007). Keeping students on the straight and narrow: Heteronormalising practices in New Zealand secondary schools. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 41(2), 311–332.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, L. (in press). Reconceptualising qualitative research involving young people and sexuality at school. In S. Lamb & J. Gilbert (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of sexuality: Childhood and adolescence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durhman, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barad, K. (2010). Quantum entanglements and hauntological relations of inheritance: Dis/continuities, spacetime enfoldings, and justice-to-come. Derrida Today, 3(2), 240–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barad, K. (2012). Nature’s queer performativity (the authorised version). Women, Gender and Research, 1(2), 25–53.Google Scholar
  7. Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: Cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  10. Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Cohen, J. (2008). An unfinished conversation about glowing green bunnies. In N. Giffney & M. Hird (Eds.), Queerying the non/human (pp. 363–375). Burlington, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  12. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Davies, B. (2016). Ethics and the new materialism: A brief genealogy of the ‘post’ philosophies in the social sciences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1234682Google Scholar
  14. Dinshaw, C. (1995). Chaucer’s queer touches/A queer touches Chaucer. Examplaria, 7, 75–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Edelman, L. (1994). Homographesis: Essays in gay literary and cultural theory. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Giffney, N., & Hird, M. (2008). Introduction: Queering the non/human. In N. Giffney & M. Hird (Eds.), Queerying the non/human (pp. 1–16). Burlington, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Gowlett, C., & Rasmussen, M. (2014). The cultural politics of queer theory in education research. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 331–334.Google Scholar
  19. Gunn, A. (2011). Even if you say it three ways, it still doesn’t mean it’s true: The pervasiveness of heteronormativity in early childhood education. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 9(3), 280–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halberstam, J. (1998). Female masculinity. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hall, D. (2003). Queer theories. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Halley, J., & Parker, A. (Eds.). (2011). After sex? On writing since queer theory. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Halperin, D. (1995). Saint Foucault: Toward a gay hagiography. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Haraway, D. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hinton, P., & van der Tuin, I. (2014). Preface. Women: A Cultural Review, 25(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  26. Hird, M. (2009). Feminist engagements with matter. Feminist Studies, 35(2), 329–346.Google Scholar
  27. Hook, G. (2015). Performatively queer: Sole parent postgraduates in the Australian academy. Higher Education Research & Development, 34(4), 788–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2015.1051006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jagose, A. (1996). Queer theory: An introduction. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Jagose, A. (2010). Counterfeit pleasures: Fake orgasm and queer agency. Textual Practice, 24(3), 517–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirby, V. (2011). Quantum anthropologies: Life at large. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kleinman, A. (2012). Intra-actions. Mousse, 34, 76–81.Google Scholar
  32. Lambevski, S. (2005). Bodies, schizo vibes and hallucinatory desires. Sexualities, 8(5), 570–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luciano, D., & Chen, M. (2015). Has the queer ever been human? GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 21(2/3), 183–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pierre, E., Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rasmussen, M., & Allen, L. (2014). What a concept can do? Rethinking education’s queer assemblages. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.888846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sedgwick, E. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  38. Sexton, S. (2012). Queer Otago secondary students’ views of their schooling environment. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 47(1), 93–105.Google Scholar
  39. Snaza, N., Appelbaum, P., Bayne, S., Carlson, D., Morris, M., Rotas, N., et al. (2014). Toward a posthuman education. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 30(2), 39–55.Google Scholar
  40. Snaza, N., & Weaver, J. (2015). Introduction. In N. Snaza & J. Weaver (Eds.), Posthumanism and educational research (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). Rethinking the empirical in the posthuman. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 25–36). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  42. Taylor, C. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for education. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 5–24). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louisa Allen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations