Advertisement

Sexuality Education Matters

  • Louisa Allen
Chapter
Part of the Queer Studies and Education book series (QSTED)

Abstract

This chapter proposes that sexuality education research and practice is caught in a cul-de-sac of predictable questions and answers that have constrained its development as an innovative curriculum area and field of research. It argues that this field’s most enduring and pertinent issues are often articulated in a series of regulating binaries such as ‘Is content appropriate/inappropriate?’ or ‘Are programmes effective/ineffective?’ These binaries produce a number of stalemates in sexuality education between, for instance, secular and religious perspectives, that fail to satisfy either group. The theoretical paradigm of new materialism, employed throughout the ensuing chapters, is introduced as a way to think differently about sexuality education’s current challenges. The research methodology undertaken in the book is also introduced.

References

  1. Adams St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). Rethinking the empirical in the posthuman. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 25–36). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  2. Alldred, P., & David, M. (2007). Get real about sex: The politics and practice of sex education. Berkshire: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, L. (2005). Sexual subjects: Young people, sexuality and schooling. Houndmills: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Allen, L. (2009). Caught in the act: Ethics committee review and researching the sexual culture of schools. Qualitative Research, 9(4), 395–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Allen, L. (2011). Young people and sexuality education: Rethinking key debates. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Allen, L. (2017). Schooling sexual cultures: Visual research and sexuality education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Allen, L., Rasmussen, M., & Quinlivan, K. (2014). The politics of pleasure in sexuality education: Pleasure bound. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  8. Allen, L., Rasmussen, M., Quinlivan, K., Aspin, C., Sanjakdar, F., & Brömdal, N. (2013). Who’s afraid of sex at school? The politics of researching culture, religion and sexuality at school. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 37(4), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.754006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bennett, J. (2004). The Force of Things: Steps Towards an Ecology of Matter. Political Theory, 32(3), 347–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Clough, P. (2009). The new empiricism: Affect and sociological method. European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cohen, J. (2008). An unfinished conversation about glowing green bunnies. In N. Giffney & M. Hird (Eds.), Queerying the non/human (pp. 363–375). Burlington, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  14. Collier, J., & Collier, M. (1986). Visual anthropology: Photography as research method. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.Google Scholar
  15. Coole, D., & Frost, S. (Eds.). (2010). New materialisms: Ontology, agency, and politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Davies, B. (2016). Ethics and the new materialism: A brief genealogy of the ‘post’ philosophies in the social sciences. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2016.1234682Google Scholar
  17. Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987 [1980]). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  18. Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2012). New materialism: Interviews and cartographies. Ann Arbor, MI: Open Humanities Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Garcia, L., & Fields, J. (2017). Renewed commitments in a time of vigilance: Sexuality education in the USA. Sex Education: Sexuality, Society and Learning, 17(4), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Giffney, N., & Hird, M. (2008). Introduction: Queering the non/human. In N. Giffney & M. Hird (Eds.), Queerying the non/human (pp. 1–16). Burlington, Hampshire: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  21. Goldman, J. (2008). Responding to parental objections to school sexuality education: A selection of 12 objections. Sex Education, 8(4), 415–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hall, D., & Jagose, A. (Eds.). (2013). The Routledge queer studies reader. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Harper, D. (1988). Visual sociology: Expanding sociological vision. American Sociologist, 19(1), 54–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hawkes, G. (2004). Sex and pleasure in western culture. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  25. Hultman, K., & Lenz Taguchi, H. (2010). Challenging anthropocentric analysis of visual data: A relational materialist methodological approach to educational research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(5), 525–542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Irvine, J. (2002). Talk about sex: The battles over sex education in the United States. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kehily, M. (2002). Sexuality, gender, and schooling: Shifting agendas in social learning. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  28. Kleinman, A. (2012). Intra-actions. Mousse, 34, 76–81.Google Scholar
  29. Koro-Ljungberg, M. (2016). Reconceptualising qualitative research: Methodologies without methodology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. MacLure, M. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26(6), 658–667.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacLure, M. (2017). Qualitative methodology and the new materialisms. In N. Denzin & M. Giardina (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times (pp. 48–58). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  32. Measor, L., Tiffin, C., & Miller, K. (2000). Young people’s views on sex education: Education, attitudes and behaviour. London: RoutledgeFalmer.Google Scholar
  33. Ministry of Education. (2016). Deciles information. Retrieved August 1, from http://www.education.govt.nz/school/running-a-school/resourcing/operationalfunding/school-decile-ratings/
  34. Paechter, C. (2004). Mens Sana in Corpore Sano: Cartesian dualism and the marginalisation of sex education. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(3), 309–320.Google Scholar
  35. Pierre, E., Jackson, A., & Mazzei, L. (2016). New empiricisms and new materialisms: Conditions for new inquiry. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 99–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rasmussen, M. (2016). Progressive sexuality education: The conceits of secularism. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Rasmussen, M., & Allen, L. (2014). What a concept can do? Rethinking education’s queer assemblages. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 35(3), 433–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.888846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rasmussen, M., Sanjakdar, F., Aspin, C., Allen, L., & Quinlivan, K. (2011). Sexuality education in Australia and New Zealand: Responding to religious and cultural difference. Australian Research Council Discovery Grant.Google Scholar
  39. Springgay, S., & Truman, S. (2017). On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (In) tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417704464
  40. St. Pierre, E. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Sage handbook of qualitative inquiry (pp. 611–635). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. St. Pierre, E. A. (2016). The empirical and the new empiricisms. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16(2), 111–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taylor, C. (2016). Edu-crafting a cacophonous ecology: Posthumanist research practices for Education. In C. Taylor & C. Hughes (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 5–24). Houndmills: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  43. Todd, S. (2011). Standing at the crossroads of the ethical and the political: Education, Feminism and Narrativity. Paper presented at the Presentation at EDGE Symposium, 8th February, Stockholm University.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, M. (2012). Aspects of ethics on four plays by Helene Cixous. Masters of Arts, University of Nottingham.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Louisa Allen
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Education and Social WorkUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations