Skip to main content

Chapter 6: Choosing to Invest in a Teaching-Only Position

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Identity-Trajectories of Early Career Researchers
  • 546 Accesses

Abstract

Teaching-only positions of course are the norm in teaching-focused institutions, where all academics receive permanence and are promoted based on the evaluation of teaching and teaching-related activities. Full-time teaching-only positions are also becoming more common at research-focused institutions where, in most institutions, there is also a possibility of permanent status. Despite recent statistics showing the growing number of teaching-only positions at research-focused universities internationally, there is scant research about the experiences of individuals in these types of positions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These teaching-only positions in Canada only had the potential for permanence not tenure.

  2. 2.

    Our interpretation is that the authors refer to nontenure track as positions with little or no responsibility for research, but they do not explicitly say so.

  3. 3.

    The limited literature on part-time teaching-only positions appears to be situated in North America.

References

  • Bauder, H. (2006). The segmentation of academic labour: A Canadian example. ACME: An International E-Journal for Critical Geographies, 4(2), 228–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D., Roberts, L., Ananthram, S., & Broughton, M. (2017). What is required to develop career pathways for teaching academics? Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-017-0138-9

  • Bland, C., Center, B., Finstad, D., Risbey, K., & Staples, J. (2006). The impact of appointment type on the productivity and commitment of full-time faculty in research and doctoral institutions. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(1), 89–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantwell, B. (2011). Academic in-sourcing: International postdoctoral employment and new modes of academic production. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 33(2), 101–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbie, D., & Robinson, I. (2008). Reorganizing higher education in the United States and Canada. Labor Studies Journal, 33(2), 117–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, M. (2010). Diversification in the academic workforce: The case of the US and implications for Europe. European Review, 18(1), S141–S156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kezar, A., & Sam, C. (2011). Understanding non-tenure track faculty: New assumptions and theories for conceptualizing behavior. American Behavioral Scientist, 554(11), 1419–1442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, J., & Shaker, G. (2011). The hybrid and dualistic identity of full-time non-tenure track faculty. American Behavioral Scientist, 55(11), 1461–1484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mason, M., Goulden, M., & Frasch, K. (2009). Why graduate students reject the fast track: A study of thousands of doctoral students shows they want balanced lives. Academe, 95(1), 9–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAlpine, L., & Amundsen, C. (2016). Post-PhD career trajectories: Intentions, decision-making and life aspirations. Basingstoke: Palgrave Pivot.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nir, A., & Zilberstein-Levy, R. (2006). Planning for academic excellence: Tenure and professional considerations. Studies in Higher Education, 31(5), 537–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ott, M., & Cisneros, J. (2015). Understanding the changing faculty workforce in higher education: A comparison of full-time non-tenure track and tenure line experiences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23(90). 10.14507/epaa.v23.1934

  • Probert, B. (2013). Teaching-focused academic appointments in Australian universities: Recognition, specialization or stratification? Office for Learning and Teaching Report. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/resource-teaching-focused-academic-appointments

  • Rajagopal, I. (2004). Tenuous ties: The limited-term full-time faculty in Canadian universities. The Review of Higher Education, 28(1), 49–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, S., & Myatt, P. (2014). Getting started in the scholarship of teaching and learning: A “how to” guide for science academics. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 42(1), 6–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon Fraser University. Academic Policy A11.10. Retrieved from https://www.sfu.ca/policies/gazette/academic/a11-10.html

  • Umbach, P. (2007). How effective are they? Exploring the impact of contingent faculty on undergraduate education. The Review of Higher Education, 30(2), 91–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of British Columbia. SAC guide to tenure, promotion and reappointment for faculty members: Promotion to professor of teaching. Retrieved from http://www.hr.ubc.ca/faculty-relations/tenure-promotion-reappointment-confirmation/tenure-promotion-reappointment-for-faculty-members/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

McAlpine, L., Amundsen, C. (2018). Chapter 6: Choosing to Invest in a Teaching-Only Position. In: Identity-Trajectories of Early Career Researchers. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95287-8_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95287-8_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95286-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95287-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics