Abstract
The share of family and non-family ties in personal networks varies not only across the life course following major transitions and events but also according to the type of welfare state in which individual lives unfold. Using network and sequence analyses, this chapter investigates for two birth cohorts (1950–1955 and 1970–1975) how the composition of personal networks is influenced by past co-residence trajectories (from 1990 to 2010) in three European countries (Switzerland, Portugal, and Lithuania). The resulting co-residence trajectories capture a great variety of situations characterized by conjugal status as well as the presence and age of children. Network analyses reveal a focus on the nuclear family of procreation, although highlighting national differences regarding the inclusion of extended kin and non-kin.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Notes
- 1.
More precisely within the birth cohort 1970–1975 the window ranges from age 15 to 35 to age 20 to 40 respectively for the youngest and the oldest individuals belonging to it. The same reasoning applies to the cohort 1950–1955.
- 2.
The number of types was chosen according to the high value of the silhouette index (Studer 2013) and the semantic value of the corresponding typology (Lapointe and Legendre 1994). We chose a relatively high number of clusters in order to adequately capture the diversity of the life trajectories followed by the individuals in our population .
- 3.
- 4.
A change in divorce regulation in Switzerland produced a local, artefactual drop in divorce frequency in Switzerland in 2000 (https://www.bfs.admin.ch/bfs/en/home /statistics /population /marriages-partnerships-divorces/divortiality.assetdetail.261933.html)
- 5.
References
Abbott, A. (2001). Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Aeby, G., Gauthier, J.-A., Gouveia, R., Ramos, V., Wall, K., & Česnuitytė, V. (2017). The impact of coresidence trajectories on personal networks during transition to adulthood: A comparative perspective. In V. Česnuitytė, D. Lück, & E. D. Widmer (Eds.), Family continuity and change: Contemporary European perspectives (pp. 211–242). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Aidukaite, J. (2006). The formation of social insurance institutions of the Baltic States in the post-socialist era. Journal of European Social Policy, 16(3), 259–270.
Antonucci, T. C., Ajrouch, K. J., & Birditt, K. S. (2014). The convoy model: Explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective. The Gerontologist, 54(1), 82–92.
Arts, W. I. L., & Gelissen, J. (2002). Three worlds of welfare capitalism or more? A state-of-the-art report. Journal of European Social Policy, 12(2), 137–158.
Becker, H. S. (1966). Outsiders : studies in the sociology of deviance ([1st ed.]). New York: Free Press.
Bernardi, L., Klärner, A., & von der Lippe, H. (2008). Job insecurity and the timing of parenthood: A comparison between Eastern and Western Germany. European Journal of Population/Revue européenne de Démographie, 24(3), 287–313.
Bidart, C., & Lavenu, D. (2005). Evolutions of personal networks and life events. Social Networks, 27(4), 359–376.
Billari, F. C., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2010). Towards a new pattern of transition to adulthood? Advances in Life Course Research, 15(2), 59–75.
Billari, F. C., Philipov, D., & Baizán, P. (2001). Leaving home in Europe: The experience of cohorts born around 1960. Population, Space and Place, 7(5), 339–356.
Blatterer, H. (2007). Contemporary adulthood: Reconceptualizing an uncontested category. Current Sociology, 55(6), 771–792.
Bonvalet, C., & Ogg, J. (Eds.). (2007). Measuring family support in Europe. London: Southern Universities Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1980). Le capital social. Actes de La Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 31, 2–3.
Brückner, H., & Mayer, K. U. (2005). De-standardizationof the life course: What it might mean? And if it means anything, whether it actually took place? Advances in Life Course Research, 9, 27–53.
Cherlin, A. J. (2010). The marriage-go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.
Cicirelli, V. G. (1995). Sibling relationships across the life span. New York/London: Plenum Press.
Déchaux, J.-H. (2007). La germanité adulte, une relation sous influence parentale. Plaidoyer pour une approche structurale. Available online https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00370364
Degenne, A., & Lebeaux, M.-O. (2005). The dynamics of personal networks at the time of entry into adult life. Social Networks, 27(4), 337–358.
Delgado, A., & Wall, K. (2011). Famílias nos Censos 2011, Diversidade e Mudança. Lisbon: National Statistics Office and Social Sciences Press.
Demey, D., Berrington, A., Evandrou, M., & Falkingham, J. (2013). Pathways into living alone in mid-life: Diversity and policy implications. Advances in Life Course Research, 18(3), 161–174.
Doherty, N. A., & Feeney, J. A. (2004). The composition of attachment networks throughout the adult years. Personal Relationships, 11(4), 469–488.
Dronkers, J. (2015). Cohabitation, marriage, and union instability in Europe|family studies. Available online http://family-studies.org/cohabitation-marriage-and-union-instability-in-europe/
Ducret, A. (2011). Le concept de “configuration” et ses implications empiriques: Elias avec et contre Weber. Sociologie. Available online https://sociologies.revues.org/3459?lang=en
Elder, G. H., Kirkpatrick Johnson, M., & Crosnoe, R. (2003). The emergence and development of life course theory. In J. T. Mortimer & M. J. Shanahan (Eds.), Handbook of the life course (pp. 3–19). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Elias, N. (1994). The civilizing process. Oxford: Blackwell.
Furstenberg, F. F. (2000). The sociology of adolescence and youth in the 1990s: A critical commentary. Journal of Marriage and Family, 62(4), 896–910.
Galland, O. (1991). Sociologie de la jeunesse: l’entrée dans la vie. Paris: Armand Colin.
Galland, O. (2003). Adolescence, post-adolescence, youth: Revised interpretations. Revue Française de Sociologie, 44(5), 163–188.
Ganon, P. (2005). Challenges in the Swiss vocational education and training system. Bwp@, 7, 1–8. Available online http://www.bwpat.de/7eu/gonon_ch_bwpat7.shtml
Gauthier, J.-A. (2013). Optimal matching, a tool for comparing life-course sequences. In R. Levy & E. D. Widmer (Eds.), Gendered life courses between standardization and individualization: A European approach applied to Switzerland (pp. 37–49). Wien: LIT Verlag.
Gauthier, J.-A., Widmer, E. D., Bucher, P., & Notredame, C. (2009). How much does it cost? Optimization of costs in sequence analysis of social science data. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(1), 197–231.
Giddens, A. (1992). The transformation of intimacy: Sexuality, love and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity.
Gouveia, R., & Widmer, E. D. (2014). The salience of kinship in personal networks of three cohorts of Portuguese people. Families, Relationships and Societies, 3(3), 355–372.
Hawkins, R. L., & Maurer, K. (2010). Bonding, bridging and linking: How social capital operated in New Orleans following Hurricane Katrina. British Journal of Social Work, 40(6), 1777–1793. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp087.
Kalmijn, M. (2003). Shared friendship networks and the life course: An analysis of survey data on married and cohabiting couples. Social Networks, 25(3), 231–249.
Kalmijn, M., & Broese van Groenou, M. (2005). Differential effects of divorce on social integration. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 22(4), 455–476.
Kanopienė, V. (1999). Combining family and professional roles: Gender differences. Revue Baltique, 13, 97–110. Special issue “Demographic development in the countries of transition.”
Kohli, M. (2007). The institutionalization of the life course: Looking back to look ahead. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 253–271.
Krüger, H., & Levy, R. (2001). Linking life courses, work, and the family: Theorizing a not so visible nexus between women and men. The Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 26(2), 145–166.
Lapointe, F.-J., & Legendre, P. (1994). A classification of pure malt scotch whiskies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series C (Applied Statistics), 43(1), 237–257.
Levy, R. (2013). Analysis of life courses – A theoretical sketch. In R. Levy & E. D. Widmer (Eds.), Gendered life courses between standardization and individualization: A European approach applied to Switzerland (pp. 13–36). Wien: LIT Verlag.
Levy, R., & Widmer, E. D. (Eds.). (2013). Gendered life courses between standardization and individualization: A European approach applied to Switzerland. Wien: LIT Verlag.
Maslauskaitė, A., & Baublytė, M. (2015). Gender and re-partnering after divorce in four central European and Baltic countries. Czech Sociological Review, 51(6), 1023–1046.
Mayer, K. U. (2001). The paradox of global social change and national path dependencies: Life course patterns in advanced societies. In A. E. Woodward & M. Kohli (Eds.), Inclusions and exclusions in European societies (pp. 89–110). London: Routledge.
Meggiolaro, S., & Ongaro, F. (2008). Repartnering after marital dissolution: Does context play a role? Demographic Research, 19, 1913–1934.
Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mills, M., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., & Velde, E. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17(6), 848–860. https://doi.org/10.1093/humupd/dmr026.
Modell, J., Furstenberg, F. F., & Hershberg, T. (1976). Social change and transitions to adulthood in historical perspective. Journal of Family History, 1(1), 7–32.
Moreland, R. L., & Zajonc, R. B. (1982). Exposure effects in person perception: Familiarity, similarity, and attraction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(5), 395–415.
Newcomb, T. M. (1960). Varieties of interpersonal attraction. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 104–119). London: Tavistock.
Neyer, G., & Hoem, J. M. (2008). Education and permanent childlessness: Austria vs. Sweden. In J. Surkyn & P. Deboosere (Eds.), Demographic challenges for the 21st century: A state of the art in demography (pp. 91–114). Brussels: Asp/Vubpress/Upa.
Olson, D. (1983). Families, what makes them work. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage Publications.
Pahl, R., & Spencer, L. (2004). Personal communities: Not simply families of “fate” or “choice”. Current Sociology, 52(2), 199–221.
Quintini, G., Martin, J. P., & Martin, S. (2007). The changing nature of the school-to-work transition process in OECD countries (SSRN scholarly paper no. ID 1884070). Rochester: Social Science Research Network. Available online: http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1884070
Radcliffe-Brown, A. R. (1940). On social structure. The Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 70(1), 1–12.
Ramos, V., Gouveia, R., & Wall, K. (2017). Coresidence as a mechanism of relational proximity: The impact of household trajectories on the diversification of personal networks. In V. Česnuitytė, D. Lück, & E. D. Widmer (Eds.), Family continuity and change: Contemporary European perspectives (pp. 187–210). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Smith, A., Wasoff, F., & Jamieson, L. (2005). Solo living across the adult lifecourse. CRFR Research Briefing, 20.
Stankūnienė, V., & Maslauskaitė, A. (2008). Family transformation in the post-communist countries: Attitudes towards changes. In C. Höhn, D. Avramov, & I. E. Kotowska (Eds.), People, population change and policies. Lessons from the population policy acceptance study (Vol. 16, 1st ed., pp. 113–140). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
Studer, M. (2013). Weighted Cluster library manual: A practical guide to creating typologies of trajectories in the social sciences with R. LIVES working papers, 24. Available online doi:10.12682/lives.2296-1658.2013.24
Terhell, E. L., Broese van Groenou, M. I., & van Tilburg, T. (2007). Network contact changes in early and later postseparation years. Social Networks, 29(1), 11–24.
Testa, M. R. (2014). On the positive correlation between education and fertility intentions in Europe: Individual- and country-level evidence. Advances in Life Course Research, 21, 28–42.
Thévenon, O. (2015). Aid policies for young people in Europe and the OECD countries. Families and Society WP Series, 34, 1–53.
Valarino, I. (2014). The emergence of parental and paternity leaves in Switzerland: A challenge to gendered representations and practices of parenthood? Lausanne: Université de Lausanne, Faculté des sciences sociales et politiques.
Van de Velde, C. (2008). Devenir adulte: sociologie comparée de la jeunesse en Europe. Paris: PUF.
Wall, K., & Escobedo, A. (2009). Portugal and Spain: Two pathways in Southern Europe. In S. B. Kamerman & P. Moss (Eds.), The politics of parental leave policies: Children, parenting, gender and the labour market (pp. 207–226). Bristol: Policy Press.
White, L. (2001). Sibling relationships over the life course: A panel analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 63(2), 555–568.
Widmer, E. D., & Gauthier, J.-A. (2013). Cohabitational trajectories. In R. Levy & E. D. Widmer (Eds.), Gendered life courses between standardization and individualization: A European approach applied to Switzerland (pp. 53–69). Wien: LIT Verlag.
Widmer, E. D., & Ritschard, G. (2009). The de-standardization of the life course: Are men and women equal? Advances in Life Course Research, 14(1), 28–39.
Acknowledgement
The authors of the chapter wish to acknowledge sponsors that made it possible to carry out this investigation, the results of which are presented in the chapter. In Switzerland , the research was supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation and the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research LIVES Overcoming Vulnerability: Life-Course Perspectives. In Portugal , the research was carried out within the national survey , “Family Trajectories and Social Networks”, coordinated by Professor K. Wall from the Institute of Social Sciences (ICS) from the University of Lisbon. In Lithuania , the research was carried out based on data collected within the research project , “Trajectories of Family Models and Personal Networks: Intergenerational Perspective”, coordinated by V. Kanopiené from Mykolas Romeris University (Lithuania) and funded by Research Council of Lithuania.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gauthier, JA., Aeby, G., Ramos, V., Česnuitytè, V. (2018). Linking Family Trajectories and Personal Networks. In: Wall, K., Widmer, E., Gauthier, J., Česnuitytė, V., Gouveia, R. (eds) Families and Personal Networks . Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Family and Intimate Life. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95263-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95263-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95262-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95263-2
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)