Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Resetting the Clock: A Feedback Approach to the Dynamics of Organisational Inertia, Survival and Change

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
System Dynamics

Part of the book series: OR Essentials ((ORESS))

  • 2250 Accesses

Abstract

Using system dynamics methods, we provide a feed-back interpretation of the ecological theory of organisational inertia and change, and explore the dynamic implications of the theory through computer simulation. The study offers three main analytical insights. Firstly, structural elements typically associated with the accumulation of organisational inertia need to be in place before organisations can exploit the advantages of cumulated experience. Secondly, inertia does not have the unique consequence of lowering organisational responsiveness to external stimuli, but also that of connecting pressure for change and change attempts within organisations. Thirdly, there seems to be an ideal level of organisational resistance to change, and hence of organisational inertia. Below this level organisations find change relatively easy to sustain, but are unable to stabilise change process and capitalise on their activities of exploration of new solutions. Above this level efforts aimed at improving the reproducibility of organisational structures are not compensated by a corresponding long-term increase in reliability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barnett WP and Carroll G (1995). Modeling internal organizational change. Ann Rev Sociol 21: 217–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Baron JN, Burton DM and Hannan MT (1996). The road taken: Origins and Evolution of employment systems in emerging companies. Indust and Corporate Change 51: 239–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lomi A, Larsen ER and Ginsberg A (1997). Adaptive learning in organizations: A system dynamics-based exploration. J Mgmt 23: 561–582.

    Google Scholar 

  4. March JG and Olsen JP (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. Am Polit Sci Rev 78: 734–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Carroll G and Harrison J (1994). On the historical efficiency of competition between organizational populations. Am J Sociol 100: 720–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Porter M (1994). Toward a dynamic theory of strategy. In R Rumelt, D Schendel and D Teece (Eds.) Fundamental Issues in Strategy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press, pp 423–461.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chen MJ and Macmillan IC (1992). Non response and delayed response to competitive moves: The roles of competitor dependence and action irreversibility. Acad Mgmt J 35: 539–570.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Barnett WP and Hansen MT (1996). The red queen in organizational evolution. Strat Mgmt J 17: 139–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Selznick P (1949). TVA and the Grass Roots. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hannan MT and Freeman J (1984). Structural inertia and organizational change. Am Sociol Rev 49: 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Amburgey T, Kelly D and Barnett WP (1993). Resetting the clock: The dynamics of organizational change and failure. Admin Sci Q 38: 51–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Senge PM and Sterman JD (1992). Systems thinking and organizational learning: acting locally and thinking globally in the organization of the future. Eur J Opl Res 59: 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sterman JD (1989). Modeling managerial behaviour: Misperception of feedback in a dynamic decision making experiment. Mgmt Sci 25: 321–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morecroft JDM, Larsen ER, Lomi A and Ginsberg A (1995). The dynamics of cooperation and competition for shared resources. Sys Dynam Rev 11: 151–177.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mosekilde E, Larsen E and Sterman JD (1991). Coping with complexity: Deterministic chaos in human decision making behaviour. In: J Casti and A Karlqvist (eds.), Beyond Belief: Randomness, Prediction and Explanation in Modern Science. Boston, MA: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gresov C, Haveman H and Oliva T (1993). Organizational design, inertia and the dynamics of competitive response. Organ Sci 4: 181–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. March JG (1982). Footnotes to organizational change. Admin Sci Q 26: 563–597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hall R (1976). A system pathology of an organization: The rise and fall of the Saturday Evening Post. Admin Sci Q 21: 185–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Masuch M (1985). Vicious circles in organizations. Admin Sci Q 30: 14–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Morecroft JDM (1988). System dynamics and microworlds for policymakers. Eur J Opl Res 35: 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Morecroft JDM and Sterman JD (Eds) (1992). Modelling for learning. Eur J Opl Res 59: 1–230.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hanneman RA, Collins R and Mordt G (1995). Discovering theory dynamics by computer: experiments on state legitimacy and imperialist capitalism. Sociol Methodol 25: 1–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sterman JD (1985). The growth of knowledge: Testing a theory of scientific revolutions with a formal model, Technol Forecasting and Social Change 28: 93–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sastry MA (1997). Problems and paradoxes in a model of punctuated organizational change. Admin Sci Q 42: 237–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Baum JAC and Singh JV (1994). Organization-environment coevolution. In: AC Baum and JV Singh (Eds.) Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp 379–402.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Brittain JW (1994). Density-independent selection and community evolution. In: AC Baum and JV Singh (eds.), Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp 355–402.

    Google Scholar 

  27. March JG (1991). Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ Sci 2: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kelly D and Amburgey T (1991). Organizational inertia and momentum: A dynamic model of strategic change. Acad Mgmt J 34: 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nelson RR and Winter SG (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hannan MT and Freeman J (1989). Organizational Ecology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stinchcombe AL (1965). Social structure and organizations. In: JG March (Ed.) Handbook of Organizations. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Haveman H (1992). Between a rock and a hard place. Admin Sci Q 37: 48–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Freeman J, Carroll GR and Hannan MT (1983). The liability of newness: Age dependence in organizational death rates. Am Sociol Rev 48: 692–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Delacroix J and Swaminathan A (1991). Cosmetic, speculative and adaptive organizational change in the wine industry: A longitudinal study. Admin Sci Q 36: 631–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Carley K (1992). Organizational learning and personnel turnover. Organ Sci 3: 20–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Krackhardt D and Stern R (1988). Informal networks and organizational crises: An experimental simulation. Social Psychol Q 51: 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Thompson J (1967). Organizations in Action. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tushman M and Anderson P (1986). Technological discontinuities and organizational environments. Admin Sci Q 31: 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tuma N and Hannan MT (1984). Social Dynamics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Sutton RI and Straw BM (1995). What theory is not. Admin Sci Q 40: 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Masuch M (1995). Computer models. In: N Nicholson (Ed.) Encyclopedic Dictionary of Organizational Behaviour. London: Blackwell, pp 91–92.

    Google Scholar 

  42. DiMaggio PJ (1995). Comments on “what theory is not”. Admin Sci Q 40: 391–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Mollona E and Lomi A (1997). Three Experiments on the Organizational Dynamics of Resource Accumulation. Working Paper. London Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Weick KE (1995). What theory is not, theorizing is. Admin Sci Q 40: 385–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Levinthal D (1992). Competitive Forces and Population Dynamics. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Mezias S and Lant T (1994). Mimetic learning and the evolution of organizational populations. In: J Baum and J Singh (Eds.) Evolutionary Dynamics of Organizations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, pp 179–198.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Levinthal D (1990). Organizational adaptation: Environmental selection and random walks. In: J Singh (Ed.) Organizational Evolution: New Directions. Newbury Park: Sage, pp 201–233.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Hannan MT and Ranger-Moore J (1990). The ecology of organizational size distributions: A micro-simulation approach. J Math Sociol 15: 67–90.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Hannan MT and Carroll G (1992). Dynamics of Organizational Populations. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Levinthal D (1991). Random walks and organizational mortality. Admin Sci Q 36: 397–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Petersen T and Koput K (1991). Density dependence in organizational mortality: Legitimacy or unobserved heterogeneity? Am Sociol Rev 56: 399–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Bruderer E and Singh JV (1996). Organizational evolution, learning and selection: A genetic-algorithm-based model. Acad Mgmt J 39: 1322–1349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lomi A and Larsen ER (1996). Interacting locally and evolving globally: A computational approach to the dynamics of organizational populations. Acad Mgmt J 39: 1287–1321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Peli G, Bruggerman J, Masuch M and O’Nualláin B (1994). A logical approach to organizational ecology. Am Sociol Rev 59: 571–593.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Carroll G and Hannan MT (1995). Organizations in Industry. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Barron J, West E and Hannan MT (1994). A time to grow and a time to die: Growth and mortality of credit unions in New York City, 1914–1990. Am J Sociol 100: 381–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Wittenberg J (1992). On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science. Sys Dynam Rev 8: 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Barlas Y (1992). Comments on “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian Science”. Sys Dynam Rev 8: 43–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Sterman JD (1992). Response to “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian science”. Sys Dynam Rev 8: 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Radziki MJ (1992). Reflections on “On the very idea of a system dynamics model of Kuhnian Science”. Sys Dynam Rev 8: 49–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Forrester JW and Senge PM (1980). Tests for building confidence in system dynamics models. In: AA Legasto, JW Forrester and JM Lyneis (Eds.) System Dynamics. Amsterdam: North-Holland, pp 209–228.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark

    E. R. Larsen

  2. University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    A. Lomi

Authors
  1. E. R. Larsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Lomi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Warwick, United Kingdom

    Martin Kunc

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Larsen, E.R., Lomi, A. (2018). Resetting the Clock: A Feedback Approach to the Dynamics of Organisational Inertia, Survival and Change. In: Kunc, M. (eds) System Dynamics. OR Essentials. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95257-1_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation