Abstract
As a “public intellectual,” Christopher Hitchens ’ eminently readable writings helped look at people and events from a different perspective—mostly, it must be said, one based on reality rather than received “wisdom” and prejudice. While Orwell sought to write a prose that was like a pane of glass and gave his famous list of do’s and don’ts, Hitchens played with words and often broke many of his mentor’s rules. The uncharitable might conclude that he was often trying to draw attention to the writer rather than the message, and they would often be right. While Orwell tends to state his theses magisterially, if occasionally cantankerously, Hitchens ’ preferred style is the polemic. He functioned best when he was arguing with an opponent, to the extent that by the time of the Iraq war he made his own windmill to tilt at—a collective stereotype left that did not actually exist.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Williams, I. (2017). Antithesis Incarnate: Christopher Hitchens , a Retrospective Glance. In: Political and Cultural Perceptions of George Orwell. Political Philosophy and Public Purpose. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95254-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95254-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95253-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95254-0
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)