Abstract
This chapter contributes to debate on the body and method within qualitative research. It argues that social science engagement with the arts and the relatively unmapped terrain of the digital body has the potential to open up new spaces, questions and methods that can inform social science methodological innovation . I make this argument by exploring how the body in the context of digital technologies was understood and researched across the arts and social sciences, drawing on examples from the MIDAS project. The chapter shows how working across the arts and social sciences can be a catalyst for methodological innovation and explores how working across these boundaries can generate creative thematic synergies for researching the digital body.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Cregan, Kate. 2006. The Sociology of the Body. London: Sage.
Delamont, Sara, and Paul Atkinson. 2001. Editorial. Qualitative Research 1 (3): 275–277.
Eisner, Elliot. 2001. Concerns and Aspirations for Qualitative Research in the New Millennium. Qualitative Research 1 (2): 135–145.
Grimshaw, Anna, Elspeth Owen, and Amanda Ravetz. 2010. Making Do: The Materials of Art and Collaboration. In Between Art and Anthropology: Contemporary Ethnographic Practice, ed. Arnd Schneider and Christopher Wright, 147–162. Oxford: Berg.
Haraway, Donna. 2008. A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology and Socialist-feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. In Sociology of the Body, ed. Claudia Malacrida, and Jacqueline Low, 354–359. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holmquist, Lars Erik. 2013. The Interplay Between Research and Industry: HCI and Grounded Innovation. In The Sage Handbook of Digital Technology Research, ed. Sara Price, Carey Jewitt, and Barry Brown, 459–472. London: Sage.
Hurdley, Rachel, and Bella Dicks. 2011. In-between Practice: Working in the ‘Third space’ of Sensory and Multimodal Ethnography. Qualitative Research 11 (3): 277–292.
Jewitt, Carey, Anna Xambo, and Sara Price. 2016. Exploring Methodological Innovation in the Social Sciences: The Body in Digital Environments and the Arts. International Journal of Social Research Methodology. doi:10.1080/13645579.2015.1129143.
Law, John. 2004. After Method: Mess in Social Science Research. London: Routledge.
Patterson, Mark. 2013. The Senses of Touch. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Shilling, Chris. 2008. The Body in Sociology. In Sociology of the Body, ed. Claudia Malacrida and Jacqueline Low, 7–13. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sullivan, Graham. 2010. Art Practice As Research. London: Sage.
Taylor, Chris, and Coffey, Amanda. 2008. Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: Possibilities and Challenges. Working Paper 121, Cardiff University, UK. Retrieved from: http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/socsi/research/publications/workingpapers/papers-121-130.html.
Travers, Max. 2009. New Methods, Old Problems: A Sceptical View of Innovation in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research 9 (2): 161–179.
Wiles, Rose, Graham Crow, and Helen Pain. 2011. Innovation in Qualitative Research Methods: A Narrative Review. Qualitative Research 11 (5): 597–604.
Xenitidou, Maria, and Nigel Gilbert. 2010. Innovations in Social Science Research Methods. National Centre for Research Methods Report. Retrieved from: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/804/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jewitt, C. (2017). Methodological Innovation, Creativity and the Digital Body. In: Broadhurst, S., Price, S. (eds) Digital Bodies. Palgrave Studies in Performance and Technology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95241-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95241-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95240-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95241-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)