Abstract
Drawing on a 4-year ethnographic analysis of the ‘Quantified Self’, Dudhwala explores how personal medical devices (PMDs) in the form of self-quantifying technologies seem to be facilitating a new boundary around that which we would traditionally call the ‘self’ or the ‘body’. Dudhwala argues, using the sensibilities of science and technology studies, that rather than self-quantifying technologies reflecting a stable self, or body, already ‘out there’ waiting to be depicted through the data they produce, the self-quantifying technologies are an inextricable part of the multiple enactments of the self and the body and thus cannot be separated from the practices of using them.
All interview material used in this chapter was gained with informed consent and is used with permission.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham & London: Duke University Press.
Barad, K. (2012). Intra-actions. Mousse, 34, 76–81.
Barad, K. (2013). On touching-the inhuman that therefore I am. Differences, 23(3), 206–223.
Bohr, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 48, 696–702.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies that matter: On the discursive limits of “Sex”. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (2010). Performative agency. Journal of Cultural Economy, 3(2), 147–161.
Butler, J. (2013). Acts and gender performative an essay in phenomenology and feminist theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519–531.
Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Physical Review, 47, 777–780.
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2000). Performing technology’s stories: On social constructivism, performance, and performativity. Technology and Culture, 14(4), 765–775.
Lupton, D. (2013). The digitally engaged patient: Self-monitoring and self-care in the digital health era. Social Theory & Health, 1–15.
Lupton, D. (2014). Critical perspectives on digital health technologies. Sociology Compass, 8(12), 1344–1359.
Mialet, H. (2012). Hawking incorporated: Stephen Hawking and the anthropology of the knowing subject. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Swan, M. (2009). Emerging patient-driven health care models: An examination of health social networks, consumer personalized medicine and quantified self-tracking. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 6(2), 492–525.
Wolf, G. (2011). ‘Quantified Sel’ | aether. Available at: http://aether.com/quantifiedself. Accessed November 3, 2011.
Woolgar, S. (2014). Struggles with representation: Could it be otherwise? In C. Coopmans, J. Vertesi, M. Lynch, & S. Woolgar (Eds.), Representation in scientific practice revisited. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dudhwala, F. (2018). Redrawing Boundaries Around the Self: The Case of Self-Quantifying Technologies. In: Lynch, R., Farrington, C. (eds) Quantified Lives and Vital Data. Health, Technology and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95235-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95235-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95234-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95235-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)