Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Prisoners Post Release: The Need for a ‘Critical Desistance’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Perspectives on Desistance

Abstract

Prison does not promote desistance. Statistics around reoffending following a custodial sentence demonstrate that the penal system is not effective in curtailing recidivism despite repeated government aims to reduce reoffending. Much desistance research has demonstrated that a cessation in offending is the outcome of a complex interaction between subjective/agency factors and social/environmental factors. However, desistance research has failed to engage with more radical arguments around prison abolition. This chapter therefore aims to examine this gap in the literature and advocates for scholarship and research into a ‘critical desistance’. Utilising the Real Utopias work of Erik Olin Wright (2006, 2010) as the basis for a more radical approach, this chapter suggests a framework for a critical desistance based on principles of social justice, emancipatory alternatives to punishment and engagement with wider social change. The reformist trajectory of most desistance research and criminal justice practice has led to the continued notion that prison could work under certain circumstances. A critical desistance approach is grounded in the abolition of prisons and punishment, rather than the reform of a system that serves to restrain desistance trajectories. This chapter argues that prison and penal punishment are a contributing cause of recidivism and, therefore hinder the process of desistance. Crucially, desistance research needs to engage with abolitionist theory, as the dismantling of the prison industrial complex would have the greatest desistance promoting potential of all.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baldry, E. 2010. ‘Women in Transition: From Prison to.’ Current Issues in Criminal Justice 22(2): 253–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, M. 2016. ‘On the Cusp of Recognition: Using Critical Theory to Promote Desistance Among Young Offenders.’ Theoretical Criminology 20(1): 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., and S. Ross. 2010. ‘Mentoring, Social Capital and Desistance: A Study of Women Released from Prison.’ The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology 43(1): 31–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett, R. 2004. ‘To Reoffend or Not to Reoffend? The Ambivalence of Convicted Property Offenders.’ In After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration, edited by S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon, 152–180. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P. 1998. Sledgehammer: Women’s Imprisonment at the Millennium. London: MacMillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carlen, P., and J. Tombs. 2006. ‘Reconfigurations of Penalty. The Ongoing Case of the Women’s Imprisonment and Reintegration Industries.’ Theoretical Criminology 10(3): 337–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton, B., and M. Segrave, eds. 2013. Women Exiting Prison: Critical Essays on Gender, Post-Release Support and Survival. Oxon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, N. 1981. Limits to Pain, The Role of Punishment in Penal Policy. Eugene, OR: Wipf and Stock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cid, J. 2009. ‘Is Imprisonment Criminogenic? A Comparative Study of Recidivism Rates between Prison and Suspended Prison Sanctions.’ European Journal of Criminology 6(6): 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. 1985. Visions of Social Control: Crime, Punishment and Classification. New York, NY: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condry, R., A. Kotova, and S. Minson. 2016. ‘Social Injustice and Collateral Damage: The Families and Children of Prisoners.’ In The Handbook on Prisons, edited by Y. Jewkes, J. Bennett, and B. Crewe, 622–640. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, V., and J. Sim. 2013. ‘Punishing the Detritus and the Damned: Penal and Semi Penal Institutions in Liverpool and the North West.’ In Why Prison? edited by D. Scott, 189–210. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Crewe, B. 2011. ‘Depth, Weight, Tightness: Revisiting the Pains of Imprisonment.’ Punishment and Society 13(5): 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. 2003. Are Prisons Obsolete? New York, NY: Seven Sisters Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fader, J.J., and L.L. Traylor. 2015. ‘Dealing with Difference in Desistance Theory: The Promise of Intersectionality for New Avenues of Inquiry.’ Sociology Compass 9(4): 247–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S. 2002. Rethinking What Works with Offenders: Probations, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S. 2004. ‘Social Capital and Offender Reintegration: Making Probation Desistance Focused.’ In After Crime and Punishment: Pathways to Offender Reintegration, edited by S. Maruna and R. Immarigeon, 57–82. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrall, S., and A. Calverley. 2006. Understanding Desistance from Crime. New York, NY: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M. 1977. Prisoners in Revolt. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgerald, M., and J. Sim. 1979. British Prisons. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. 2001. The Culture of Control. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano, P.C., S.A. Cernkovich, and J.L. Rudolph. 2002. ‘Gender, Crime and Desistance: Toward a Theory of Cognitive Transformation.’ The American Journal of Sociology 107(4): 990–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K. 2001. Punishment in Disguise: Penal Governance and Federal Imprisonment of Women in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hannah-Moffat, K., P. Maurutto, and S. Turnbull. 2009. ‘Negotiated Risk: Actuarial Illusions and Discretion in Probation.’ Canadian Journal of Law and Society 24(3): 391–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, E.L. 2016. ‘Women Prisoners and the Drive for Desistance: Capital and Responsibilisation as a Barrier to Change.’ Women and Criminal Justice (Advance Online Publication). doi: 10.1080/08974454.2016.1217814.

  • Hart, E.L., and R. Schlembach. 2015. ‘The Wrexham Titan Prison and the Case Against Prison Expansion.’ Critical and Radical Social Work 3(2): 289–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. 2010. The Dynamics of Desistance: Charting Pathways through Change. Cullompton: Willan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, D. 2013. ‘Changing Fate? Agency and the Desistance Process.’ Theoretical Criminology 17(4): 557–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough, M., S. Farrall, and F. McNeill. 2012. Intelligent Justice: Balancing the Effects of Community Sentences and Custody. London: Howard League for Penal Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard League for Penal Reform. 2014. Breaking Point: Understaffing and Overcrowding in Prisons Research Briefing. London: Howard League for Penal Reform.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joliffe, D., and C. Hedderman. 2015. ‘Investigating the Impact of Custody on Reoffending Using Propensity Score Matching.’ Crime and Delinquency 61(8): 1051–1077.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemshall, H. 2002. ‘Effective Practice in Probation: An Example of ‘Advanced Liberal Responsibilisation?’ Howard Journal of Criminal Justice 41(1): 41–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, S. 2013. ‘Assisted Desistance and Experiences of Probation Supervision.’ Probation Journal 60(2): 136–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LeBel, T., R. Burnett, S. Maruna, and S. Bushway. 2008. ‘The “Chicken and Egg” of Subjective and Social Factors in Desistance from Crime.’ European Journal of Criminology 5(2): 131–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebling, A., and S. Maruna, eds. 2005. The Effects of Imprisonment. Cullompton: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Listwan, S.J., C.J. Sullivan, R. Agnew, F.T. Cullen, and M. Colvin. 2013. ‘The Pains of Imprisonment Revisited: The Impact of Strain on Inmate Recidivism.’ Justice Quarterly 30(1): 144–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. 2001. Making Good: How Ex-Convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McNeill, F., and B. Weaver. 2007. Giving Up Crime: Directions for Policy. Edinburgh: Scottish Consortium on Crime and Criminal Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, R., and G.E. Lewis. 2014. ‘Promoting Well-Being and Desistance Through Sport and Physical Activity: The Opportunities and Barriers Experienced by Women in English Prisons.’ Women and Criminal Justice 24(2): 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. 2014a. Offender Management Statistics Bulletin, England and Wales. Jan-March 2014. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. 2014b. Safety in Custody Statistics England and Wales, Update to March 2014. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Justice. 2015. Proven Reoffending Statistics Quarterly: October 2012 to September 2013. London: Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.M. 2015. ‘Reframing the “Prison Works” Debate. For Whom and in What Ways Does Prison Work?’ Reclaim Justice Network, 10 March. Available at: https://downsizingcriminaljustice.wordpress.com/2015/03/10/reframing-the-prison-works-debate-for-whom-and-in-what-ways-does-prison-work/.

  • Morizot, J., and M. Le Blanc. 2007. ‘Behavioral, Self and Social Control Predictors of Desistance from Crime: A Test of Launch and Contemporaneous Effect Models.’ Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice 23(1): 50–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagin, D.S., F.T. Cullen, and C.L. Jonson. 2009. ‘Imprisonment and Reoffending.’ In Crime and Justice: A Review of Research (Vol. 38), edited by M. Tonry, 115–200. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nieuwbeerta, P., D.S. Nagin, and A.A.J. Blokland. 2009. ‘The Relationship Between First Imprisonment and Criminal Career Development: A Matched Samples Comparison.’ Journal of Quantitative Criminology 25(3): 227–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, B., and P. Barnes. 2013. ‘Desistance and Young People: Includem’s Work with Children and Young People and the Limitations of Desistance Theory.’ Scottish Justice Matters December: 21–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nugent, B., and M. Schinkel. 2016. ‘The Pains of Desistance.’ Criminology and Criminal Justice (Advance Online Publication). doi: 10.1177/1748895816634812.

  • Palmer, E., R. Hatcher, J. McGuire, and C. Hollin. 2015. ‘Cognitive Skills Programs for Female Offenders in the Community: Effect on Reconviction.’ Criminal Justice and Behaviour 42(4): 345–360. doi: 10.1177/0093854814552099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, M., and J. Sim. 2016. ‘Campaigning for and Campaigning Against Prisons: Excavating and Reaffirming the Case for Prison Abolition.’ In The Handbook on Prisons, edited by Y. Jewkes, J. Bennett, and B. Crewe, 712–733. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schinkel, M., and F. McNeill. 2016. ‘Prisons and Desistance.’ In The Handbook on Prisons, edited by Y. Jewkes, J. Bennett, and B. Crewe, 607–621. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, D. 2013. ‘Visualising an Abolitionist Real Utopia: Principles, Policy and Praxis.’ In Crime, Critique and Utopia, edited by M. Malloch and B. Monro, 90–113. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sered, S. 2014. ‘Suffering in an Age of Personal Responsibility.’ Contexts 13(2): 38–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sim, J. 2009. Punishment and Prisons, Power and the Carceral State. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohn, C., and D. Holleran. 2002. ‘The Effect of Imprisonment on Recidivism Rates of Felony Offenders: A Focus on Drug Offenders.’ Criminology 40(2): 329–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sykes, G. 1958. The Society of Captives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travers, R., H.C. Wakeling, R.E. Mann, and C.R. Hollin. 2013. ‘Reconviction Following a Cognitive Skills Intervention: An Alternative Quasi-Experimental Methodology.’ Legal and Criminological Psychology 18(1): 48–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ginneken, E.F.J.C. 2016. ‘Making Sense of Imprisonment: Narratives of Posttraumatic Growth Among Female Prisoners.’ Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 60(2): 208–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, B. 2007. ‘The Internal Narrative of Desistance.’ British Journal of Criminology 47(3): 390–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. 2009. Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. 2010. ‘Prisoner Reentry and Myth and Ceremony.’ Dialectical Anthropology 34(4): 605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. 2013. ‘Crafting the Neoliberal state: Workfare, Prisonfare and Social Insecurity.’ In Why Prison? edited by D. Scott, 65–86. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E.O. 2006. ‘Compass Points: Towards a Socialist Alternative.’ New Left Review 41: 93–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, E.O. 2010. Envisioning Real Utopias. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Law School, Lancaster University, Lancashire, UK

    Emily Luise Hart

Authors
  1. Emily Luise Hart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emily Luise Hart .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Law School, Lancaster University, Lancaster, United Kingdom

    Emily Luise Hart

  2. Institute for Criminal Law & Criminology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands

    Esther F.J.C. van Ginneken

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hart, E.L. (2017). Prisoners Post Release: The Need for a ‘Critical Desistance’. In: Hart, E., van Ginneken, E. (eds) New Perspectives on Desistance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95185-7_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95185-7_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95184-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95185-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation