Abstract
In most Western countries, health-care expenses are mainly covered by health insurance companies and/or national health systems that narrowly define the concept of medical care. Any service that is reimbursed must demonstrate scientifically its ability to meet health needs in a more cost-effective way. Most digital-health applications lack proof that they lead to a long-term improvement in user health that would lead to economic benefits for health systems. Traditional economic evaluations recommended by health-care authorities are poorly adapted to the specificities of telemedicine. Multidimensional assessment frameworks can help to better assess its added value, even if they also have certain limitations. While waiting to demonstrate the economic benefits retroactively once telemedicine services are widespread, business models must support these start-up phases by independent financing.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
INAHTA (International Network of Agencies for Health Technology Assessment) (October 8, 2013). HTA glossary. HTAi.
- 2.
Grille d’Evaluation Multidisciplinaire Santé Autonomie—Multidimensional Evaluation Grid for Health and Autonomy.
References
Aday, L. A., and C. E. Begley. 1993. Evaluating the medical care system. Ann Arbor, MI: Health Administration Press.
Agamben, Giorgio. 2007. Qu’est-ce qu’un dispositif? Paris: Payot & Rivages.
Alexander, Dobrev, Veli N. Tom Jones, Karl A. Stroetmann, Jörg Artmann Stroetmann, Anne Kersting, Narges Kasiri, Dainis Zegners, and Stefan Lilischkis. 2008. Sources of financing and policy recommendations to member states and the European Commission on boosting eHealth investment. European Commission DG INFSO & Media.
Bashshur, R. L. 1995. Telemedicine effects: Cost, quality, and access. Journal of Medical Systems 19(2): 81–91.
Bergmo, T. S. 2009. Can economic evaluation in telemedicine be trusted? A systematic review of the literature. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation 7: 18.
Briggs, A. H., and B. J. O’Brien 2001. The death of cost-minimization analysis? Health Economics 10(2): 179–184.
Campbell, M., R. Fitzpatrick, A. Haines, A. L. Kinmonth, P. Sandercock, D. Spiegelhalter, and P. Tyrer. 2000. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 321(7262): 694–696.
Damanpour, Fariborz. 1991. Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal 34(3): 555–590.
Darkins, Adam William, and Margaret Ann Cary. 2000. Telemedicine and telehealth: Principles, policies, performances and pitfalls. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Dinesen, B., B. Nonnecke, D. Lindeman, E. Toft, K. Kidholm, K. Jethwani, H. M. Young, H. Spindler, C. U. Oestergaard, J. A. Southard, M. Gutierrez, N. Anderson, N. M. Albert, J. J. Han, and T. Nesbitt. 2016. Personalized telehealth in the future: A global research agenda. Journal of Medical Internet Research 18(3): e53.
Ekeland, Anne Granstrøm, and Grøttland Astrid. 2015. Assessment of mast in European patient-centered telemedicine pilots. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 31(5): 304–311.
Engeström, Y. 2000. Activity theory as a framework for analyzing and redesigning work. Ergonomics 43(7): 960–974.
Foucault, M. 2001. Dits et écrits II, 1976–1988. Paris: Gallimard.
Haggerty, J. L., R. J. Reid, G. K. Freeman, B. H. Starfield, C. E. Adair, and R. McKendry. 2003. Continuity of care: A multidisciplinary review. BMJ 327(7425): 1219–1221.
Jones, B., P. Jarvis, J. A. Lewis, and A. F. Ebbutt. 1996. Trials to assess equivalence: The importance of rigorous methods. BMJ: British Medical Journal 313(7048): 36–39.
Kidholm, K., A. G. Ekeland, L. K. Jensen, J. Rasmussen, C. D. Pedersen, A. Bowes, S. A. Flottorp, and M. Bech. 2012. A model for assessment of telemedicine applications: Mast. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care 28(1): 44–51.
Le-Goff-Pronost, Myriam, and Robert Picard. 2011. Need for ICTs assessment in the health sector: A multidimensional framework. Communications & Strategies 83: 87–108.
May, C., T. Finch, F. Mair, L. Ballini, C. Dowrick, M. Eccles, L. Gask, A. MacFarlane, E. Murray, and T. Rapley. 2007. Understanding the implementation of complex interventions in health care: The normalization process model. BMC Health Services Research 7(1): 148.
MedCom, and Norwegian Centre for Integrated Care and Telemedicine. 2010. MethoTelemed, Final Study Report, Version 2.
Pascal, Christophe, Eric Garcia, Stéphane Fraisse, and David Piovesan. 2002. La télémédecine, entre fantasme et réalité. Santé et Systémique 6(1-2-3): 321–336.
Peters, Christoph, Ivo Blohm, and Jan Marco Leimeister. 2015. Anatomy of successful business models for complex services: Insights from the telemedicine field. Journal of Management Information Systems 32(3): 75–104.
Rogers, Everett M. 2003. Diffusion of innovations, 5th ed. New York: Free Press.
Schumpeter, Joseph Alois. 1983. Théorie de l’évolution économique: recherches sur le profit, le crédit, l’intérêt et le cycle de la conjoncture. Translated by J.-J. Anstett. Paris: Dalloz.
Scott, W. Richard. 1990. Innovation in medical care organizations: A synthetic review. Medical Care Research and Review 47(2): 165–192.
Shiell, A., P. Hawe, and L. Gold. 2008. Complex interventions or complex systems? Implications for health economic evaluation. BMJ 336(7656): 1281–1283.
Syed, S. T., B. S. Gerber, and L. K. Sharp. 2013. Traveling towards disease: Transportation barriers to health care access. Journal Community Health 38(5): 976–993.
Zamora, Bernarda. 2013. Strategic intelligence monitor on personal health systems, Phase 2. Luxembourg: European Commission – Joint Research Centre – Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
Van Dyk, L. 2014. A review of telehealth service implementation frameworks. The International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11(2): 1279–1298.
Wootton, R. 2012. Twenty years of telemedicine in chronic disease management–An evidence synthesis. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 18(4): 211–220.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pascal, C. (2017). Tapping the Full Potential of eHealth: Business Models Need Economic Assessment Frameworks. In: Menvielle, L., Audrain-Pontevia, AF., Menvielle, W. (eds) The Digitization of Healthcare. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95173-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95173-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95172-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95173-4
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)