Skip to main content

Nobrow, American Style

From Goldilocks to the Golden Mean

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
When Highbrow Meets Lowbrow
  • 460 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 3, Peter Swirski’s “Nobrow, American Style: From Goldilocks to the Golden Mean” defines and refines what we mean by nobrow. Starring in this part of our story are three amicable bears and a golden-curled cutie who, through an act of culinary theft, clarifies the principle that hums at the heart of artertainment. What follows is the story of nobrow as a cultural formation, as a creative strategy, and as an aesthetic reception strategy. It takes us into the inner workings of artertainment through encounters with marvels as diverse as the King of the Jungle, the grooviest of grooves, and the recent raft of award-winning “flockumentaries” spliced together from snippets of YouTube videos.

What do you get when you cross highbrow aesthetics with lowbrow genres? An identity crisis.

—Nobrow joke

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    On apocalyptic and integrated scholarship, see Eco, 1994.

  2. 2.

    See, for example, Swirski, 1999, 2005, 2010a; 2016a and 2016b; Seabrook, 2000; Anderson, 2004; Jordan, 2005; Collins, 2010; Menand, 2011.

  3. 3.

    Swirski, 2005.

  4. 4.

    In Raab, 2000; on McBain, see Swirski, 2016a, chapter 5.

  5. 5.

    Tilley, 2012; on the Lowbrow Art Movement (aka Pop Surrealism), see Anderson, 2004; Jordan, 2005.

  6. 6.

    Swirski, 2005, chapter 2; 2016a, chapter 1.

  7. 7.

    A recent acknowledgment of normative fallibility comes from the 2015 New York Review of Books: “Now widely considered a masterpiece, If This Is a Man was turned down by Turin’s main publishing house…it was also rejected by five other publishers” (Parks, 2015, p. 28); for other examples, see Swirski, 2005, chapter 2.

  8. 8.

    Levine, 1990; Boas, 1940.

  9. 9.

    Swirski, 2015b; see also Swirski, 2010b.

  10. 10.

    Rankine, 2015, p. 24; on the dominance of popular culture, see Williams, 1989; Carroll, 2000.

  11. 11.

    Jameson, 1991, p. 316; Larkin in Campbell, 2015, p. 32. Eliot’s 1948 essay was Notes Towards the Definition of Culture. Oddly, when it comes to popular culture old Marxists like Adorno or Guy Debord and New Marxists like Jules Serroy or Gilles Lipetsky stand shoulder to shoulder with old and new conservatives like Eliot or George Steiner.

  12. 12.

    Swirski, 2015b; on rap, see Swirski, 2015a, chapter 4.

  13. 13.

    More, 1516/2003, p. 10; More wrote in Latin, the lingua franca of the eliterati of the day.

  14. 14.

    See Meisel, 2010, p. 6; as such, Meisel is dead wrong in endorsing Mencken’s timetable.

  15. 15.

    Brooks, 1915, p. 491.

  16. 16.

    See Frend, 1992, p. 26.

  17. 17.

    Rubin, 1992; Radway, 1997; Hammill, 2010.

  18. 18.

    Driscoll, 2014, p. 9; my italics. In another crucial departure from the “new” middlebrow, nobrow as a cultural formation goes back to the dawn of the twentieth century (see Swirski, 2005, p. 10).

  19. 19.

    Menand, 2011, p. 76; on two-way traffic, see Swirski, 1999, 2005, 2016a, 2016b.

  20. 20.

    See also Dalziel, 1957; this stratification is predicated on the classical social model of five classes—see BBC News, 2013 on seven social classes in the UK.

  21. 21.

    For discussion and bibliography, see Swirski, 2005.

  22. 22.

    Swirski, 2010b, p. 165; see also Swirski, 2005, pp. 44–45.

  23. 23.

    Witek et al., 2014; also Keller and Schubert, 2011; Berlyne, 1971.

  24. 24.

    Wilson, 1998; Tomasello, 1999; Carroll, 2001; Swirski, 2007.

  25. 25.

    See Turner and Poppel, 1983; also Poppel, 1989; on chronobiology, see Macar et al., 1992.

  26. 26.

    Holub, p. 3.

  27. 27.

    Kauffman, 1995.

  28. 28.

    Davies, 2006; Kidd et al., 2012.

  29. 29.

    Swirski, 2015b.

  30. 30.

    See Swirski, 2010b, chapters 2 and 3. In a like-minded experiment in academia, the introduction to the scholarly collection I Sing the Body Politic (2009) was executed by Swirski et al. in a series of “blind” round-robins.

  31. 31.

    In Dodes, 2011.

  32. 32.

    Swirski, 2010b.

  33. 33.

    Cooper, 2015.

  34. 34.

    For a recent analysis, see Darnton, 2015.

Bibliography

  • Brooks, Van Wyck. (1915). “Highbrow and Lowbrow.” The Forum, April, pp. 481–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seabrook, John. (2000). Nobrow: The Culture of Marketing, the Marketing of Culture. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Peter. (2005). From Lowbrow to Nobrow. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s UP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Peter. (2016a). American Crime Fiction: A Cultural History of Nobrow Literature as Art. New York: Palgrave Macmillan

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Kirsten (ed.). (2004). Pop Surrealism: The Rise of Underground Art. San Francisco, CA: Ignition/Last Gasp.

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC News. (2013). “Huge Survey Reveals Seven Social Classes in UK.” 3 April. http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-22007058

  • Berlyne, D.E. (1971). Aesthetics and Psychobiology. East Norwalk, CT: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boas, George. (1940). “The Mona Lisa in the History of Taste.” Journal of the History of Ideas 1(2): pp. 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Jim. (2015). “As tears go by.” Times Literary Supplement, 22 May, p. 32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Joseph. (2001). Reading Human Nature: Literary Darwinism in Theory and Practice. New York: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, Noël. (2000). Theories of Art Today. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Jim. (2010). Bring On the Books for Everybody: How Literary Culture Became Popular Culture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, David. (2015). Béla Bartók. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dalziel, Margaret. (1957). Popular Fiction 100 Years Ago: An Unexplored Tract of Literary History. London: Cohen and West.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnton, Robert. (2015). Censors at Work: How States Shaped Literature. London: British Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Paul. (2006). The Goldilocks Enigma: Why Is the Universe Just Right for Life? Boston, MA: Mariner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodes, Rachel. (2011). “‘Life in a Day’ Director Aims to Elevate YouTube Videos Into Art.” The Wall Street Journal, 22 July. http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2011/07/22/life-in-a-day-director-kevin-macdonald-aims-to-elevate-youtube-videos-into-art/?mod=google_news_blog

  • Driscoll, Beth. (2014). The New Literary Middlebrow. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, Umberto. (1994). Apocalypse Postponed. Ed. Robert Lumley. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliot, T.S. (1920a). “Hamlet and His Problems.” In The Sacred Wood. http://www.bartleby.com/200/sw9.html

  • Frend, Tad. (1992). “The Case for Middlebrow: Defending the Common Man’s ‘Simpler’ Sensibilities.” The New Republic, 2 March, pp. 24–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gans, Herbert J. (1974). Popular Culture and High Culture: An Analysis and Evaluation of Taste. New York, NY: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill, Faye. (2010). Sophistication: A Literary and Cultural History. Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Holub, Miroslav. (1990). The Dimension of the Present Moment: Essays by Miroslav Holub. London: Faber and Faber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, Matt Dukes. (2005). Weirdo Deluxe: The Wild World of Pop Surrealism and Lowbrow Art. San Francisco, CA: Chronicle Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, Stuart A. (1995). At Home in the Universe: The Search for Laws of Self-Organization and Complexity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, P.E., and Schubert E. (2011). “Cognitive and Affective Judgments of Syncopated Musical Themes.” Advances in Cognitive Psychology 7: pp. 142–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd, C., S.T. Piantadosi, and R.N. Aslin. (2012). “The Goldilocks Effect: Human Infants Allocate Attention to Visual Sequences That Are Neither Too Simple Nor Too Complex.” PLoS One 7. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0036399

  • Levine, Lawrence. (1990). Highbrow/Lowbrow: The Emergence of Cultural Hierarchy in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macar, Francoise, Viviane Pouthas, and William J. Friedman (eds.). (1992). Time, Action and Cognition: Toward Bridging the Gap. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisel, Perry. (2010). The Myth of Popular Culture: From Dante to Dylan. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menand, Louis. (2011). “Browbeaten: Dwight Macdonald’s War on Midcult.” The New Yorker. http://www.newyorker.com/arts/critics/atlarge/2011/09/05/110905cart_atlarge_menand

  • Mencken, H.L. (1919/1921). The American language: An Inquiry into the Development of English in the United States. 2nd ed. New York: A. A. Knopf. http://www.bartleby.com/br/185.html

  • More, Thomas. (1516/2003). Utopia. Trans. Paul Turner. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks, Tim. (2015). “The Mystery of Primo Levi.” The New York Review of Books, 5–18 November, p. 28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppel, Ernst. (1989). “The Measurement of Music and the Cerebral Clock: A New Theory.” Leonardo 22: pp. 83–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raab, Selwyn. (2000). “Writing under an Assumed Name.” The New York Times, 30 January. https://www.nytimes.com/books/00/01/30/reviews/000130.30raabt.html

  • Radway, Janice A. (1997). A Feeling for Books: The Book-of-the-Month Club, Literary Taste, and Middle-Class Desire. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankine, Marion. (2015). “At the Bottom of the Brows.” The Times Literary Supplement, 8 May, p. 24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, Joan Shelley. (1992). The Making of Middlebrow Culture. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Peter. (1999). “Popular and Highbrow Literature: A Comparative View.” CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture 1. http://clcwebjournal.lib.purdue.edu/clcweb99_4/swirski99.html

  • Swirski, Peter. (2007). Of Literature and Knowledge: Explorations in Narrative Thought Experiments, Evolution, and Game Theory. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Peter. (2009). I Sing the Body Politic: History as Prophecy in Contemporary American Literature. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Peter. (2010a). Ars Americana, Ars Politica: Partisan Expression in Contemporary American Literature and Culture. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Peter. (2010b). Literature, Analytically Speaking: Explorations in the Theory of Interpretation, Analytic Aesthetics, and Evolution. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Peter. (2015a). American Political Fictions: War on Errorism in Contemporary American Literature, Culture, and Politics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Swirski, Peter. (2015b). “The Zettabyte Problem, or the End of Cultural History As We Know It.” The Montreal Review, August. http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/The-Zettabyte-Problem.php

  • Swirski, Peter. (2016b). “The Art of Artertainment, American Style.” The Montreal Review, June. http://www.themontrealreview.com/2009/The-Art%20of-Artertainment.php

  • The People vs. George Lucas. (2010). Dir. Alexandre O. Philippe. Exhibit A Pictures, Quark Films. 93 mins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley, Carol. (2012). “Seducing the Innocent: Fredric Wertham and the Falsifications that Helped Condemn Comics.” Information & Culture 47: pp. 383–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, Michael. (1999). “The Human Adaptation for Culture.” Annual Review of Anthropology 28: pp. 509–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Frederick, and Ernst Poppel. (1983). “The Neural Lyre: Poetic Meter, the Brain, and Time.” Poetry 142: pp. 277–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wertham, Fredric. (1954). Seduction of the Innocent: The Influence of Comic Books on Today’s Youth. New York: Rinehart and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Raymond. (1958/1989). “Culture Is Ordinary.” In Resources of Hope: Culture, Democracy, Socialism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. (1998). Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Witek, M.A., E.F. Clarke, M. Wallentin, M.L. Kringelbach, and P. Vuust. (2014). “Syncopation, Body-Movement and Pleasure in Groove Music.” PloS ONE 9. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0094446

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Swirski .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Swirski, P. (2017). Nobrow, American Style. In: Swirski, P., Vanhanen, T. (eds) When Highbrow Meets Lowbrow. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95168-0_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics