Abstract
The chapter examines how Hill’s writings on the capability-expectations gap (CEG) have been picked up, concentrating on the performative role of the concept of CEG. The chapter first outlines the quantitative side of the dissemination of Hill’s CEG concept, and then turns to a qualitative analysis of the ways in which the articulation of the CEG concept have been performative in promoting meanings along the lines of the gap discourse. The main point is that the dominant discourse on the CEG in Hill’s writings has framed and shaped the subsequent use of the concept of CEG. No publications referring to Hill’s writing on the CEG have touched on the destabilizing elements presented in the deconstructive reading in Chapter 3 or any other criticism for that sake. Even ideas for transforming the concept (credibility gap, consensus gap, legitimacy gap, expectations deficit, communication deficit, etc.) have been formulated within the dominant gap discourse.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
It makes a difference whether you search for “capability-expectation gap”, “capability expectations gap” or capability-expectations gap. “Capability-expectations gap” gives the most hits.
- 2.
All searches took place on 25 March 2016.
- 3.
Searches took place 16 May 2015 through Harzing’s Publish or Perish.
- 4.
Smith presents a brief overview of the EU’s CEGs in different areas under the heading of “Credibility and capability gaps”. However, he does not go into how he measures the CEG apart from saying that “…we might ask whether the lofty ideals expressed by the EU are in fact matched by solid policy successes in the real world of diplomacy” (Smith 2011:188–190)
- 5.
There is, however, an unease expressed about the consequences of these different gap situations for EU actorness in Wong’s observation that there is a “lack of consensus on the nature of the European Union…reflected in the lack of a clear conception of the EU’s contours, capabilities and relevance amongst Asia elites” (Wong 2012:36).
References
Adler-Nissen, R., and K. Knop. 2015. “A Sociology of Knowledge Approach to European Integration: Four Analytical Principles.” Journal of European Integration 37(2): 155–173.
Algheri, F. 1999. “The Coherence Dilemma of EU External Relations: The European Asian Policy.” Journal of Asia Pacific Economy 4(1): 81–99.
Allen, D., and M. Smith. 1990. “Western Europe’s Presence in the Contemporary International Arena.” Review of International Studies 16(1): 19–37.
Börtzel, T. 2005. “Mind the Gap: European Integration Between Level and Scope.” Journal of European Public Policy 12(2): 217–236.
Bengtsson, R., and Elgström, O. 2012. “Conflicting Role Conceptions? The European Union in Global Politics.” Foreign Policy Analysis 8(1): 93–108.
Bickerton, C., B. Irondelle, and A. Menon. 2011. “Security Co-Operation beyond the Nation State: The EU’s CSDP.” Journal of Common Market Studies 49(1): 1–21.
Bretherton, C., and J. Vogler. 1999. The European Union as a Global Actor. London: Routledge.
Bull, H. 1982. “Civilian Power Europe: A Contradiction in Terms?” Journal of Common Market Studies 21(2): 149–170.
Cameron, F. 2002. “The European Union’s Growing International Role: Closing the Capability-Expectations Gap?” Working Paper, ANU Center for European Studies.
Chaban, N. 2011. “The EU´s Imagery as Social, Developmental and Environmental Actor.” EU External Affairs Review 2: 5–23.
Chaban, N., and M. Holland. 2008. “Introduction.” In The European Union and the Asia-Pacific – Media, Public and Elite Perceptions of the EU, ed. Chaban and Holland, London: Routledge.
Chaban, N., O. Elgström, and M. Holland. 2006. “The European Union as Others See It.” European Foreign Affairs Review 11: 245–262.
Chan, G., L.-H. Chan, and P. Lee. 2008. “Rethinking Global Governance: A China Model in the Making?” Contemporary Politics. 14(1): 3–19.
Duchêne, F. 1972. “Europe’s Role in World Peace.” In Europe Tomorrow: Sixteen Europeans Look Ahead, ed. R. Mayne. London: Fontana.
Edwards, G. 2005. “The Pattern of the EU’s Global Activities.” In International Relations and the European Union, eds. C. Hill and M. Smith, 39–65. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Edwards, G. 2011. “The Pattern of the EU’s Global Activity.” In International Relations and the European Union, eds. C Hill and M Smith, 45–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Elgström, O. 2007. “The EU in International Trade Negotiations.” Journal of Common Market Studies 45: 949–969.
Elgström, O., and M. Smith. 2006. “Introduction.” In The European Union’s Roles in World Politics, eds. O. Elgstrom and S. Smith, London: Routledge.
Ginsberg, R. 1999. “Conceptualising the European Union as an International Actor: Narrowing the Theoretical Capability-Expectations Gap.” Journal of Common Market Studies 37(3): 429–454.
Harpaz, G. 2008. “Mind the Gap: Narrowing the Legitimacy Gap in EU-Israeli Relations.” European Foreign Affairs Review 13(1): 117–137.
Hill, C. 1993. “The Capability-Expectations Gap, or Conceptualising’s Europe’s International Role.” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(3): 305–328.
Hill, C. 1998. “Closing the Capability-Expectations Gap?” In A Common Foreign Policy For Europe?, eds. J. Peterson and H. Sjursen, 18–38. London: Routledge.
Hill, C., and M. Smith eds. 2011a. International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holland, M. 2005. “Bridging the Gap: A Case Study of the Joint CFSP Action on South Africa.” Journal of Common Market Studies 33(2): 555–572.
Howorth, J. 2011. “The EU’s Security and Defence Policy: Towards a Strategic Approach.” In International Relations and the European Union, eds. C. Hill and M. Smith, 197–225. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hyde-Price, A. 2006. “Normative Power Europe: A Realist Critique.” Journal of European Public Policy 13(2): 217–234.
Kelbel, C. 2016. “Elmer Recast: The Patchework of EU Theories with the Journal of Common Market Studies.” In Political Science in Motion, eds. R. Coman and J.-F. Morin, Editions Université de Bruxelles: Brussels.
Keukeleire, S., and T. Delreux. 2014. The Foreign Policy of the European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Larsen, H. 2014. “The EU as a Normative Power and the Research on External Perceptions: The Missing Link.” Journal of Common Market Studies 52(4): 896–910.
Lucarelli, S. 2007. “The European Union in the Eyes of Others: Towards Filling a Gap in the Literature.” European Foreign Affairs Review 12: 249–270.
Lucarelli, S., and L. Fioramonti eds. 2010. The European Union as a Global Actor. Routledge: London.
Nielsen, K. 2013. “EU Soft Power and the Capability-Expectation Gap.” Journal of Contemporary European Research 9(5): 723–739.
Pace, M. 2004. “The Euromediterranean Partnership and the Common Mediterranean Strategy?” European Union Policy from a Discursive Perspective. Geopolitics 9(2): 292–309.
Pan, Z. 2012. Conceptual Gaps in China-EU Relations: Global Governance, Human Rights and Strategic Partnerships. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pewglobal. 2013. http://www.pewglobal.org/2012/06/13/chapter-2-attitudes-toward-american-culture-and-ideas/. Accessed 24 May 2013.
Regelsberger, E. 1997. “From EPC to CFSP: Does Maastrict Push the EU Towards a Role as a Global Power?” In Foreign Policy of the European Union: from EPC to CFSP and Beyond, eds. E. Regelsberger, P. De Schouteete, and W. Wessels, 1–19. Boulder and London: Lynne Rienner.
Richardson, J., ed. 2006. European Union: Power and Policy-Making. London: Routledge.
Rosamond, B. 2002. “Imagining the European Economy: ‘Competitiveness’ and the Social Construction of ‘Europe’ as an Economic Space.” New Political Economy 7(2): 157–177.
Scott-Smith, G. 2014. “Does the EU need An Asian Pivot? Some Reflections.” ANUCES Briefing Paper Series 5(3): (April 2014): 1–20.
Sjöstedt, G. 1977. The External Role of the European Community. Gower Publishing: London.
Smith, K.E. 2004. Still Civilian Power EU? Paper for Arena Workshop. http://www.sv.uio.no/arena/english/research/projects/cidel/old/WorkshopOsloSecurity/Smith.pdf
Smith, M. 2001. “The EU as an International Actor.” In European Union: Power and Policy-Making, ed. J. Richardson, 283–302. London: Routledge 2001.
Smith, M., and R. Steffenson. 2011. “The EU and the United States.” In International Relations and the European Union, eds. C. Hill and M. Smith, 405–431. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Smith, M.E. 2011. “Implementation: Making the EU’s International Relations Work.” In International Relations and the European Union, eds. C. Hill and M. Smith, 171–173. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stavridis, S., and J. Hutchene. 2000. “Mediterranean Challenges to the EU’s Foreign Policy.” European Foreign Affairs Review 5: 35–62.
Toje, A. 2008. “The Consensus–Expectations Gap: Explaining Europe’s Ineffective Foreign Policy.” Security Dialogue 39(1): 121–141.
Tsuruoka, M. 2008. “The ‘Expectations Deficit’ in EU-Japan Relations: Why the Relationship Cannot Flourish.” Current Politics and Economics of Asia 17(1): 107–126.
Tulmets, E. 2007. “Can the Discourse on ‘Soft Power’ Help the EU to Bridge its Capability-Expectations Gap?” European Political Economy 7 (no volume number) 195–226.
Wendt, A. 1999. Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitman, R. 2006. “Road Map for a Route March? (De-)Civilizing through the EU’s Security Strategy.” European Foreign Affair Review 11: 1–15.
Wong, R. 2012. “Still in Deficit: Perceptions of the EU’s Capabilities Among Foreign Policy Elites in Singapore, Indonesia and Vietnam.” EU External Affairs Review 2, July: 35–45.
Wunderlich, Jens Uwe. 2012. “The EU an Actor Sui Generis? A Comparison of EU and ASEAN Actorness.” Journal of Common Market Studies 50(4): 653–669.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Larsen, H. (2017). The Performativity of the Capability-Expectations Gap. In: Gaps in EU Foreign Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95166-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95166-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95165-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95166-6
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)