Skip to main content

Sharing News and Views About Evolution in Social Media

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

We have harnessed social media to meet our evolved needs to communicate, learn, and form and maintain social connections. For many of us, especially those of us who reside in the American South, beliefs about evolution are constitutive of self-identity and community affiliation. As such, these beliefs are resistant to change. These beliefs may be challenged by educators, scientists, and journalists. But we tend to interpret these challenges as threats, and we tend to employ social media to reinforce our solidarity with like-minded others. It can prove difficult to teach evolution or cover it objectively as a journalist, since the topic so readily triggers emotions that discourage or even short-circuit analytical thought. Journalists may be tempted to pander to emotions, to create stories about evolution that provoke and alarm viewers. This chapter positions social media in its evolutionary context; considers the distinctive aspects of social media users in the South; and reviews trends in religious affiliation that portend continued resistance to human evolution in the South even as acceptance grows elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Robin I.M. Dunbar, “The social brain hypothesis and human evolution,” in The Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology, edited by Oliver Braddick (New York: Oxford University Press, 2016), doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.44.

  2. 2.

    Hank Davis and S. Lyndsay McLeod, “Why humans value sensational news: An evolutionary perspective,” Evolution & Human Behavior 24, no. 3 (2003), 208–216.

  3. 3.

    “Bill Nye: Creationism is not appropriate for children,” YouTube video, 2:31, posted August 23, 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gHbYJfwFgOU

  4. 4.

    “Ken Ham responds to Bill Nye ‘The Humanist Guy,’” YouTube video, 4:44, posted August 31, 2012, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JxX11c1cSWU

  5. 5.

    Jonathan P. Hill, “National study of religion & human origins,” report published by Jonathan P. Hill, accessed May 23, 2016, https://biologos.org/uploads/projects/nsrho-report.pdf

  6. 6.

    Frank Newport, “In U.S., 42% believe creationist view of human origins,” published online June 2, 2014, http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx

  7. 7.

    Ibid.

  8. 8.

    Leslie J. Rissler, Sarah I. Duncan and Nicholas M. Caruso. 2014. “The relative importance of religion and education on university students’ views of evolution in the Deep South and state science standards across the United States,” Evolution: Education and Outreach 7, no. 1 (2014), 1–17.

  9. 9.

    “America’s changing religious landscape,” published online May 12, 2015 (New York: Pew Research Center), http://www.pewforum.org/2015/05/12/americas-changing-religious-landscape

  10. 10.

    Jesse R. Harrington and Michele J. Gelfand, “Tightness–looseness across the 50 United States,” PNAS 111, no. 22 (2014), 7990–7995.

  11. 11.

    Louis S. Nadelson and Sherry A. Southerland, “A more fine-grained measure of students’ acceptance of evolution: Development of the Inventory of Student Evolution Acceptance – I-SEA,” International Journal of Science Education 24, no. 11 (2012), 1637–1666.

  12. 12.

    Leda Cosmides and John Tooby, “The evolutionary psychology of the emotions and their relationship to internal regulatory variables,” in Handbook of Emotions (3rd ed.), edited by Lisa Feldman Barrett, Michael Lewis and Jeannette M. Haviland-Jones (New York: Guilford Press, 2008), 114–137.

  13. 13.

    Jesse Graham, Jonathan Haidt and Brian A. Nosek, “Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 96, no. 5 (2009), 1029–1046.

  14. 14.

    Brian J. Bowe and Jennifer Hoewe, “Night and day: An illustration of framing and moral foundations in the Oklahoma Shariah Amendment campaign,” Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, published online in advance of print on January 27, 2016, doi: 10.1177/1077699016628806; Evans, William, “Television news audiences as tribes, television news as moral alliance,” The Evolutionary Review 4 (2013), 37–48; Jonathan Haidt, The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion (New York: Pantheon, 2012).

  15. 15.

    Albert C. Gunther, “Hostile media perceptions,” in The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, edited by Gianpietro Mazzoleni (New York: Wiley-Blackwell, 2015), 478–481.

  16. 16.

    Jerome H. Barkow, Rick O’Gorman and Luke Rendell, “Are the new mass media subverting cultural transmission?” Review of General Psychology 16, no. 2 (2012), 121–133, 121.

  17. 17.

    Holgar Schramm, “Parasocial interactions and relationships,” in The International Encyclopedia of Communication, edited by Wolfgang Donsbach (New York: Blackwell, 2008), 3501–3506.

  18. 18.

    Jerome H. Barkow, Rick O’Gorman and Luke Rendell, “Are the new mass media subverting cultural transmission?”

  19. 19.

    Adam D. I. Kramer, Jamie E. Guillory and Jeffrey T. Hancock, “Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks,” PNAS 111, no. 24 (2014), 8788–8790.

  20. 20.

    Emilio Ferrara and Zeyao Yang, “Measuring emotional contagion in social media.” PLoS ONE 10, no. 11 (2015), e0142390, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0142390.

  21. 21.

    Amy Mitchell, Jeffrey Gottfried and Katerina Eva Matsa, “Millennials and political news” (New York: Pew Research Center), published online, June 1, 2015, http://www.journalism.org/2015/06/01/millennials-political-news

  22. 22.

    Ibid.

  23. 23.

    Frank Newport, “In U.S., 42% believe creationist view of human origins.”

  24. 24.

    “America’s changing religious landscape,” 2015.

  25. 25.

    Frank Newport, “In U.S., 42% believe creationist view of human origins.”

  26. 26.

    Greg C. Armfield and R. Lance Holbert, “The relationship between religiosity and internet use,” Journal of Media and Religion 2, no. 3 (2003), 129–144; Allen B. Downey, “Religious affiliation, education and Internet use,” arXiv (2014), 1403.5534; Phil Zuckerman, “Secularism and the Internet: How the web erodes religion,” The Secular Life (blog), January 7, 2016, https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/the-secular-life/201601/secularism-and-the-internet

  27. 27.

    Paul K. McClure, “Faith and Facebook in a pluralistic age: The effects of social networking sites on the religious beliefs of emerging adults,” Sociological Perspectives, published online in advance of print on May 10, 2016, doi: 10.1177/0731121416647361.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Evans, W. (2017). Sharing News and Views About Evolution in Social Media. In: Lynn, C., Glaze, A., Evans, W., Reed, L. (eds) Evolution Education in the American South. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95139-0_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95139-0_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95138-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95139-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics