Mirrored Reflections



Lewis examines the intricacies of teaching and researching preservice teachers who mirrored her personal background and initial perceptions of teaching in a high poverty urban school. The methodology, subjectivity, author’s voice, and analysis of this timely and original study are detailed.


Qualitative research Subjectivity Teacher education 


  1. Alridge, D. (2003). The dilemmas, challenges, and duality of an African-American educational historian. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bogden, R. & Bilken, S. (2007). Qualitative Research for education: An introduction to theories and methods. Boston: Pearson.Google Scholar
  3. Creswell, J. W, & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Davies, D., & Dodd, J. (2002). Qualitative research and the question of rigor. Qualitative Health Research, 12(2), 279–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to research methods. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Du Bois, W. E. B. (1944). Phylon: Science or propaganda. Phylon, 5(1), 5–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Eisner, E. W. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  8. Glaser, B.G. (1965). The constant comparative method of qualitative analysis. Social Problems, 12(4), 436–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Glaser, B. G. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity: Advances in the methodology of grounded theory. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.Google Scholar
  10. Glaser, B.G. & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  11. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606.Google Scholar
  12. Johnson-Bailey, J. (2004). Enjoining positionality and power in narrative work: Balancing contentious and modulating forces. In K. De Marrais & S. Lapan (Eds.), Foundations for Research: Methods of inquiry in education and the social sciences (pp. 13–30). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Ladson-Billings, G. (2009). The dreamkeepers: Successful teachers of African American children. New York: Josey-Bass, Incorporated.Google Scholar
  14. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  15. Stenbacka, C. (2001). Qualitative research requires quality concepts of its own. Management Decision, 39(7), 551–556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Education DepartmentSpelman CollegeAtlantaUSA

Personalised recommendations