Abstract
In this chapter I examine the experiences of parole in South Australia. Specifically, I explore three dimensions: 1) how (would-be) parolees try to take charge of their post-custodial circumstances in order to avoid being “set up to fail”; 2) how over-policing (and outright police harassment) can inhibit successful integration into the community; and 3) how the right “type” of parole officer can make a positive difference even in the most difficult situations. In concluding I suggest that in political climates governed by a heightened emphasis on risk management, the capacity to build therapeutic and productive relationships with clients is largely pushed out of the frame. Implications for successful reintegration are briefly discussed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Due to perceptions of “high risk” by government personnel, permission to interview juveniles about the impact of parental imprisonment was not obtained.
References
(ABS) Australian Bureau of Statistics (2015a). Corrective services, Australia. September Quarter 2015, publication 4512.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
(ABS) Australian Bureau of Statistics (2015b). Prisoners in Australia. publication 4517.0. Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics.
(ABS) Australian Bureau of Statistics (2016). Corrective services, Australia. December Quarter 2016, publication 4512.0 (Summary Findings), Canberra: Australian Bureau of Statistics. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4512.0. Accessed 14 April 2016.
Arditti, J. (2012). Parental incarceration and the family. New York: New York University Press.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. London: Sage.
Cherney, A., & Fitzgerald, R. (2016). Efforts by offenders to manage and overcome stigma: The case of employment. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 28, 17–31.
(DCS) South Australian Department for Correctional Services (2015). Annual Report 2014/2015. Adelaide: Government of South Australia.
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992). The new penology: Notes on the emerging strategy of corrections and its implications. Criminology, 30, 449–474.
Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8, 777–795.
Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. New York, NY: Vintage.
Halsey, M., Armstrong, R., & Wright, S. (2016). “F*ck It!”: Matza and the mood of fatalism in the desistance process. British Journal of Criminology. doi:10.1093/bjc/azw041
Halsey, M., & Deegan, S. (2015). Young offenders: Crime, prison, and struggles for desistance. London: Palgrave.
Halsey, M. (2010). Imprisonment and prisoner re-entry in Australia. Dialectical Anthropology, 34, 545–554.
Halsey, M. (2007). Assembling recidivism: The promise and contingencies of post-release life. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 97, 1209–1260.
McNeill, F. (2009). What works and what’s just?. European Journal of Probation, 1, 21–40.
Petersilia, J. (2003). When prisoners come home. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
(RGS) Report on Government Services (2016). Corrective Services. (Chapter 8) Canberra: Productivity Commission.
Acknowledgements
Data for this work was collected under the Generations Through Prison project, funded by the Australian Research Council (FT120100284). The author is most grateful for such support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halsey, M. (2016). Prisoner (Dis)Integration in Australia: Three Stories of Parole and Community Supervision. In: Armstrong, R., Durnescu, I. (eds) Parole and Beyond. Palgrave Studies in Prisons and Penology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95118-5_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95118-5_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95117-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95118-5
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)