Abstract
This chapter presents case studies of workers in the underground economy—as taxi drivers and cash-in-hand manual workers. Informality as a ‘normal’ response to uncertainty and contingency is explored here. Manual work in informality builds a personhood based on self-reliance, but also trust in socially equal others. Masculine spaces of leisure, sociality and work are explored where working-class ‘authentic’ manhood can be rehearsed and even experimented with. Displays of working-class skill and ingenuity ‘for their own sake’ are explored in terms of MacIntyre’s definition of ‘practice’ and ‘internal good’. DIY sustains workers, allowing a propertizing (in Skeggs’ sense) of personhood and class. These practical and ethical dispositions lead to a rejection of a simple narrative of ‘adaptation’ and the remoulding of the working self as ‘entrepreneurial’.
A small part of this chapter pertaining to skilled informal tradesmen derives from ethnographic material published previously (Morris 2014), as do some of the materials on DIY practices (2012b).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Zhenya’s CD collection also included a quantity of downloaded pornography, I later learnt. These CDs circulated in a way similar to the ‘economy of jars’ and were used to cement ties as men would ‘swap’ their latest downloads.
- 2.
Since 2010 two bars have opened and manage to ply a business of sorts but the nature of their clientele is unclear and they are talked of as ‘off limits’ by all my informants due to the perception that they are linked to criminal gangs and because of their exceptionally high prices. Upon visiting them they turned out to be unremarkable, if extremely expensive places frequented by local men with money to spend on their women.
- 3.
For some teenage girls there was less worry about propriety, and garages were seen as a legitimate refuge from the domestic sphere for girlfriends to go to avoid the policing of sexual behaviour. In an example of ‘strength in numbers’, groups of young women would regularly make barbeques outside garages, while more upwardly mobile women illustrated their wholesale rejection of the garages’ possibility of propriety by renting at great expense parking spaces in the private, gated car parks that were ‘guarded’ 24 hours a day. These spaces were often right next door to the traditional garage blocks, but in terms of symbolic value were as far from them as the traditional Soviet blocks of flats were from the villas of the local elites.
- 4.
By the same token the access to garages over time takes on significance in terms of socio-economic stratification within the community of factory workers. As restrictions on the further building of garages are put in place and the rental or resale cost of these outbuildings as property increases significantly, there are many younger workers ‘left behind’ who have no access to these spaces apart from as friends of those who already own them. This in turn reinforces the sense of the places as a precious resource. Those younger men with a garage are an object of envy and are something of a labour ‘aristocracy’.
- 5.
See previous chapter for a discussion of the more polychronic approach to task management in Russian production. See also Hall (1983) for a culturally differentiated discussion of polychronicity.
- 6.
Nonetheless, it is fair to say that taxi drivers inevitably were exposed to criminals and prostitutes in the town and in some respects this gave them an ‘advantage’ in finding other sources of income, whether legal or illegal. See, for example, the description of fuel theft and reselling in the town, which was facilitated by taxi drivers (Morris 2014).
- 7.
‘Mutual support’ translates ‘vzaimovyruchka’, which has more of a concrete meaning than the more standard ‘vzaimopomoshch’’, meaning ‘mutual aid’.
- 8.
Hirschman’s (1971) hermeneutic framework on responses to insecurity in organizations faced by crisis has been used elsewhere to analyse choices facing ordinary people after socialism, particularly as an apt metaphor for the ‘non’-choices that workers faced during the 1990s transition. See, for example, Ellerman 1998; Bohle and Greskovits 2007; Szabo 2009; Sippola 2014. My use of the framework draws on Crowley’s (2004) proposition of ‘exit’ into the informal economy for workers who have no ‘voice’ which in turn draws on Greskovits (1998).
- 9.
References
Attfield, J. (2000). Wild things: The material culture of everyday life. Oxford: Berg.
Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2007). Neoliberalism, embedded neoliberalism and neocorporatism: Towards transnational capitalism in Central-Eastern Europe. West European Politics, 30(3), 443–466.
Browne, K. (2014). Homes and paths: Notes on finding place in consumer anthropology. Journal of Business Anthropology, 3(1), 109–125.
Burawoy, M., Krotov, P., & Lytkina, T. (2000). Involution and destitution in capitalist Russia. Ethnography, 1(1), 43–65.
Cavanagh, J., Southcombe, A., & Bartram, T. (2014). The role of collaborative learning on training and development practices within the Australian Men’s Shed movement: A study of five Men’s Sheds. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 66(3), 365–385.
Clarke, S. (1995). Management and industry in Russia: Formal and informal relations in the period of transition. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Clarke, S. (1999). New forms of employment and household survival strategies in Russia. Coventry: University of Warwick, Centre for Comparative Labour Studies.
Connell, R. W. (1995). Masculinities. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Crowley, S. (2004). Explaining labor weakness in post-communist Europe: Historical legacies and comparative perspective. East European Politics & Societies, 18(3), 394–429.
Cruikshank, B. (1993). Revolutions within: Self-government and self-esteem. Economy and Society, 22(3), 327–344.
Ellerman, D. (1998). Voucher privatization with investment funds: An institutional analysis (World Bank Policy research paper no. 1924). Washington: The World Bank.
Friedman, J. R. (2007). Shock and subjectivity in the age of globalization: Marginalization, exclusion, and the problem of resistance. Anthropological Theory 2007 7: 421–449.
Greskovits, B. (1998). The political economy of protest and patience. East European and Latin American transformations compared. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Hall, E. T. (1983). The dance of life: The other dimension of time. Garden City: Anchor Press.
Hirschman, A. (1971). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Keat, R. (2000). Cultural goods and the limits of the market. London: Macmillan/Palgrave.
Kideckel, D. A. (2004). Miners and wives in Romania’s Jiu Valley: Perspectives on postsocialist class, gender, and social change. Identities, 11, 39–63.
Morgan, D. (1992). Discovering men. London: Routledge.
Morris, J. (2011). Socially embedded workers at the nexus of diverse work in Russia: An ethnography of blue-collar informalization. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 31(11–12), 619–631.
Morris, J. (2012a). Unruly entrepreneurs: Russian worker responses to insecure formal employment. Global Labour Journal, 3(2), 217–236.
Morris, J. (2012b). Beyond coping? Alternatives to consumption within Russian worker networks. Ethnography, 14(1), 85–103.
Morris, J. (2014). Moonlighting strangers met on the way: The nexus of informality and blue-collar sociality in Russia. In J. Morris & A. Polese (Eds.), The informal post-socialist economy: Embedded practices and livelihoods (pp. 51–66). London/New York: Routledge.
Morris, J., & Polese, A. (Eds.). (2014). The informal post-socialist economy: Embedded practices and livelihoods. London/New York: Routledge.
Olick, J. K. (1999). Collective memory: The two cultures. Sociological Theory, 17, 233–348.
Ries, N. (2009). Potato ontology: Surviving post-socialism in Russia. Cultural Anthropology, 24(2), 181–212.
Sayer, A. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sippola, M. (2014). Balancing between exit, voice and loyalty: Labour market policy choices in Estonia. In J. Sommers & C. Woolfson (Eds.), The contradictions of austerity: The socio-economic costs of the neoliberal Baltic model (pp. 118–137). London/New York: Routledge.
Skeggs, B. (2004). Exchange, value and affect: Bourdieu and ‘the self’. The Sociological Review, 52, 75–95.
Smollet, E. (1989). The economy of jars. Ethnologie Europa, 19, 125–140.
Stenning, A., Smith, A., Rochovská, A., & Swiatek, D. (2010). Domesticating neo-liberalism: Spaces of economic practice and social reproduction in post-socialist cities. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Straughn, J. B. (2009). Culture, memory, and structural change: Explaining support for ‘socialism’ in a post-socialist society. Theory and Society, 38, 485–525.
Szabo, Z. (2009). Exit, voice, loyalty in transition: A theoretical framework. Transition Studies Review, 15, 650–659.
Temnitskii, A. L. (2011). Samostoiatel’nost’ v rabote kak factor formirovaniia sub’ektnosti rabochikh Rossii. Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniia, 12, 35–43.
Verdery, K. (1999). The political lives of dead bodies: Reburial and postsocialist change. New York: Columbia University Press.
White, A. (2004). Small-town Russia. Postcommunist livelihoods and identities: A portrait of the intelligentsia in Achit, Bednodemyanovsk and Zubtsov, 1999–2000. London/New York: Routledge.
Williams, C., & Round, J. (2007). Beyond negative depictions of informal employment: Some lessons from Moscow. Urban Studies, 44(12), 2321–2338.
Woolfson, C., & Beck, M. (2004). The end of labour quiescence? Industrial unrest in contemporary Lithuania. International Journal of Comparative Labour Law and Industrial Relations, 2, 227–251.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Morris, J. (2016). Informal Economy: Going Underground but Coming Out of the Shadows. In: Everyday Post-Socialism. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95089-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95089-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95088-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95089-8
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)