Skip to main content

Multicultural and Antiracist Education in the US and the UK

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Critical Race Theory and Education

Part of the book series: Marxism and Education ((MAED))

Abstract

In the first part of this chapter, I begin by discussing three forms of reactionary multicultural education in the US identified by Peter McLaren. I go on to analyse McLaren’s advocacy, in his postmodern phase, of ‘critical resistant multiculturalism’, a form of multiculturalism favoured by Critical Race Theorist Gloria Ladson-Billings. I conclude the section of the chapter on the US by appraising McLaren’s promotion, since he returned to the Marxist problematic, of ‘revolutionary multiculturalism’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 37.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Atkinson identifies specifically with postmodernism; Baxter identifies with feminist poststructuralism and Lather describes herself both as a ‘postmodern materialist feminist’ (e.g. 1991, p. xix) and as a feminist poststructuralist (e.g. 2001). This is not of concern here, since I am interested in their common claim that poststructuralism and postmodernism can be forces for social change and social justice. For a discussion of the origins and theoretical distinctions between poststructuralism and postmodernism, see Cole (2008a, chapters 4 and 5).

  2. 2.

    According to Baxter (2002), poststructuralism may ultimately promote social and educational transformation because it listens to all voices, and because it deconstructs. However, as she acknowledges, it is unconvincing in practice and can only (possibly) become convincing if more feminist researchers take it up. No indications are given of how the promotion of transformation might occur. For a further defence of poststructuralism against Marxism, see Baxter (2009). For my reply, see Cole (2009a).

  3. 3.

    In so doing, she makes the claim that CRT does ‘not necessarily [privilege] race over class, gender, or other identity category’ (Ladson-Billings, 2005, p. 57). In chapter 3 of this volume, I have argued that, in fact, such privileging is a defining feature of CRT. Having said that, as recorded above (endnote 4 of the chapter 1 to this volume), there are a number of offshoots from CRT which deal with various identities, though not, crucially, social class. As we shall see below, the revolutionary multiculturalism of McLaren and others, while centering on class, also encompasses other forms of oppression and exploitation. Later in this chapter, I will note how this has always been the case with antiracist education in the UK.

  4. 4.

    For a critique of the notion of ‘fixed ability’, see Hart et al. (2004). For a Marxist assessment of Hart et al., see Cole (2008b); see also Yarker (2008), Cole (2008c).

  5. 5.

    For a recent critical Marxist analysis of Schooling in Capitalist America, see Rikowski (2005b).

  6. 6.

    Ladson-Billings, though a Critical Race Theorist, draws at times on poststructuralism and postmodernism and also on Marxism. As I argued in chapter 4, her writing often shows sympathy for Marxist theory and concepts.

  7. 7.

    A turning point was a conference he and I both attended in Halle, in the former DDR in 1995. McLaren has written of our time in Halle:

    My time spent with you was a profound step in getting my work back on track to Marx. No question about that…listening to your talk in Halle, spending time with you, experiencing East Germany with you, that really shook me…it was a major moment, perhaps the key single moment; then, of course, the next step was reading over the criticisms of my work by you, Dave [Hill] and Glenn [Rikowski]…and then the correspondence among us by e-mail…and I began to reeducate myself with the help of comrades such as yourself, reading Capital, and a half dozen other books of Marx, Marx and Engels, and also Hegel (via the Marxist humanist tradition of News and Letters/Dunayevskaya) putting myself on a program of study and dialogue with other Marxists, working with Ramin [Farahmandpur] and other Marxist students…and I began reading the Open Marxist folks via Glenn, getting into Glenn’s work on the labor theory of value…and reading major Marxist journals like Science and Society, and then finally meeting Peter Hudis of News and Letters and hanging out with him in LA and learning a lot. (personal correspondence 2002, cited in Cole 2005. Cole 2005 contains an analysis of McLaren’s trajectory from postmodernism to Marxism: see pp. 108–114).

  8. 8.

    Fryer cites evidence of a large percentage of skeletons of black Africans found among 350 excavated in 1951, dating back to Roman times (Fryer 1984, cited in Brandt 1986, p. 7).

  9. 9.

    For an analysis of racism and education from the days of the British Empire up to the present, see, for example, Cole and Blair (2006).

  10. 10.

    In 1979, the nomenclature ‘black’ in the UK was generally a term that applied to all people of color and indeed, as a political statement, also used by some South (Mediterranean) Europeans such as Cypriots.

  11. 11.

    The National Front was the UK’s biggest fascist political party at the time, with as many as 20,000 members in the mid-1970s. It declined after 1979 with the advent of the Thatcher Government and the subsequent lurch to the right in British politics.

  12. 12.

    Antiracist education in the UK has traditionally shown awareness of equality issues other than ‘race’. Over twenty years ago, in my own writing for example, (e.g. Cole 1986a, b; see also Troyna 1987), issues of social class and gender/patriarchy were central to the analysis.

  13. 13.

    It should be recorded that there was one mainstream exception. The Left-wing Inner London Education Authority (ILEA), eventually abolished by Thatcher in 1988, published a number of equality documents in the 1980s, including Race, Sex and Class: 4. Anti-Racist Statement and Guidelines (ILEA 1983), and distributed the pamphlets to all of its schools. For an analysis of the political climate in the years of the Radical Right, see, for example, Hill (1989, 1997); see also Jones (2003), Tomlinson (2005).

  14. 14.

    This was all part of a concerted Radical Right attack on Teacher Education which was assumed to be a hotbed of Marxism (see Hill 1989, 1994, 2001a, b, 2007; see also Cole 2004, pp. 150–163). This legacy continues to this day. For example, the term ‘trainee’ rather than ‘student teacher’ relates to the Radical Right notion that teacher training is not a theoretical enterprise, but a combination of love of subject and practical skills. For similar reasons it is the Training and Development Agency that oversees teacher education. However, progressive equalities legislation (see Nixon 2008) has required departments of education in universities, university colleges and colleges to verse their student teachers in equality issues (for detailed suggestions as to how the current QTS standards can be used to have equality and equal opportunities at their forefront, see Cole (ed.) (2008d); for suggestions on promoting equality in the primary/elementary school, see Hill and Helavaara Robinson (eds) (2009), and for ideas for the secondary/high school, see Cole (ed) 2009b.

  15. 15.

    ‘PC’ or ‘Political correctness’ is a pernicious concept invented by the Radical Right, which, to my dismay, has become common currency in the UK. The term was coined to imply that there exist (Left) political demagogues who seek to impose their views on equality issues, in particular appropriate terminology, on the majority. In reality, nomenclature changes over time. Thus, in the twenty-first century, terms such as ‘negress’ or ‘negro’ or ‘coloured’, nomenclatures which at one time were considered quite acceptable, and are now considered offensive. Egalitarians are concerned with respect for others and, therefore, are careful to acknowledge changes in nomenclature, changes which are decided by oppressed groups themselves, bearing in mind that there can be differences among such oppressed groups. Thus, for example, it has become common practice to use ‘working class’ rather than ‘lower class’; ‘lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender’ rather than ‘sexually deviant’; ‘disability’ rather than ‘handicap’, ‘gender equality’ rather than ‘a woman’s place’. Using current and acceptable nomenclature is about the fostering of a caring and inclusive society, not about ‘political correctness’ (Cole 2008b, pp. 142–3).

References

  • Atkinson, E. (2001). A response to Mike Cole’s “educational postmodernism, social justice and social change: An incompatible ménage-à-trois”. The School Field, 12(1/2), 87–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2002). A Juggling Act: A feminist post-structuralist analysis of girls’ and boys’ talk in the secondary classroom. Gender and Education, 14(1), 5–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2009). A case for post-structuralism. In SYMPOSIUM Marxism and educational theory: Origins and issues (Mike Cole) discussed by Judith Baxter, Samuel Fassbinder, and Ravi Kumar, with a response by Mike Cole, Policy Futures in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1992). And we are not saved. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America. London: Routledge and Keegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandt, G. (1986). The realization of anti-racist teaching. Lewes: Falmer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carby, H. V. (1979). Multicultural fictions (Stencilled occasional paper SP No. 58). University of Birmingham, Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1986a). Teaching and learning about racism: A critique of multicultural education in Britain. In S. Modgil, et al. (Eds.), Multicultural education: The interminable debate. Barcombe: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1986b, Autumn). Multicultural education and the politics of racism in Britain. Multicultural teaching.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1992). British values, liberal values or values of justice and equality? Three approaches to education in a multicultural society. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Equity or excellence?: Education and cultural reproduction cultural reproduction and the schools (Vol. 3). London: The Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1998, Spring). Racism, reconstructed multiculturalism and antiracist education. Cambridge Journal of Education, 28(1), 37–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (2004). Rethinking the future: The commodification of knowledge and the grammar of resistance. In M. Benn & C. Chitty (Eds.), For Caroline Benn: Essays in education and democracy. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (2005). The ‘inevitability of globalized capital’ vs. the ‘ordeal of the undecidable’: A Marxist critique. In M. Pruyn & L. M. Heurta-Charles (Eds.), Teaching Peter McLaren: Paths of dissent. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (2008a). Marxism and educational theory: Origins and issues. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (2008b). Learning without limits: A Marxist assessment. Policy Futures in Education, 6(4), 453–463.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (2008c). Reply to Pat Yarker. Policy Futures in Education, 6(4), 468–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (Ed.). (2008d). Professional attributes and practice for student teachers; meeting the QTS standards (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (2009a). On capitalism, imperialism, social justice and socialism. In REVIEW SYMPOSIUM Marxism and educational theory: Origins and issues (Mike Cole) discussed by Judith Baxter, Samuel Fassbinder, and Ravi Kumar, with a response by Mike Cole, Policy Futures in Education, 7(1), pp. 120–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (Ed.). (2009b). Equality in the secondary school: Promoting good practice across the curriculum. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M., & Blair, M. (2006). Racism and education: From empire to new labour. In M. Cole (Ed.), Education, equality and human rights: Issues of gender, ‘race’, sexuality, disability and social class (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commission on Integration and Cohesion. (2007). Our shared future. Wetherby: Communities and Local Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1990). Force of law: The mystical foundation of authority, translated. Mary Quaintance. Cardozo Law Review, 11, 919–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • Education and Inspections Act. (2006). London: HM Government. Online. Available HTTP: http://www.opsi.gov.uk/Acts/acts2006/ukpga_20060040_en_1. Accessed 28 July 2008.

  • Foster, J. B. (2005, July–August). The renewing of socialism: An introduction. Monthly Review, 57(3). http://monthlyreview.org/2005/07/01/the-renewing-of-socialism-an-introduction/.

  • Fryer, P. (1984). Staying power: The history of black people in Britain. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haberman, M. (1991). The pedagogy of poverty versus good teaching. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 290–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, C. (1993). Whiteness as property. Harvard Law Review, 106, 1707–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S., Dixon, A., Drummond, M. J., & McIntyre, D. (2004). Learning without limits. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (1989). Charge of the Right Brigade: The radical right’s attack on teacher education. Brighton: Institute for Education Policy Studies. Online. Available HTTP: http://www.ieps.org.uk.cwc.net/hill1989.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2008.

  • Hill, D. (1994). Initial teacher education and ethnic diversity. In G. Verma & P. Pumfrey (Eds.), Cultural diversity and the curriculum, Vol 4: Cross-curricular contexts, themes and dimensions in primary schools. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (1997). Equality in primary schooling: The policy context, intentions and effects, of the conservative “reforms”. In M. Cole, D. Hill, & S. Shan (Eds.), Promoting equality in primary schools. London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (2001a). State theory and the neo-liberal reconstruction of schooling and teacher education: A structuralist neo-Marxist critique of postmodernist, quasi-postmodernist, and culturalist neo-Marxist theory. The British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 137–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (2001b). Equality, ideology and educational policy. In D. Hill & M. Cole (Eds.), Schooling and equality: Fact, concept and policy. London: Kogan Page.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, D. (2007). Critical teacher education, new labour in Britain, and the global project of neoliberal capital. Policy Futures, 5(2), 204–225. Online at http://www.wwwords.co.uk/pfie/content/pdfs/5/issue5_2.asp

  • Hill, D., & Helavaara Robertson, L. (Eds.). (2009) Equality in the primary school: Promoting good practice across the curriculum. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inner London Education Authority (ILEA). (1983). Race, sex and class: 4. Anti-racist statement and guidelines. London: ILEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, K. (2003). Education in Britain 1944 to the present. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, R. (2006, August 24). Ruth Kelly’s speech on integration and cohesion. The Guardian.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. E. (2001). Culture-centered knowledge: Black studies, curriculum transformation, and social action. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2005). New directions in multicultural education: Complexities, boundaries, and critical race theory. In J. A. Banks & C. A. M. Banks (Eds.), Handbook of research on multicultural education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G. (2006). Foreword they’re trying to wash us away: The adolescence of critical race theory in education. In A. D. Dixson & C. K. Rousseau (Eds.), Critical Race Theory in education: All God’s children got a song. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladson-Billings, G., & Tate, W. F. (1995). Toward a critical race theory of education. Teachers College Record, 97(1), 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lather, P. (2001). Ten years later, yet again: Critical pedagogy and its complicities. In K. Weiler (Ed.), Feminist engagements: Reading, resisting and revisioning male theorists in education and cultural studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavalette, M., Mooney, G., Mynott, E., Evans, K., & Richardson, B. (2001). The Woeful record of the house of Blair. International Socialism, Issue 90. Online. Available HTTP: http://pubs.socialistreviewindex.org.uk/isj90/lavalette.htm. Accessed 14 Feb 2008.

  • Macpherson, W. (1999). The Stephen Lawrence enquiry, report of an enquiry by Sir William Macpherson. London, HMSO. Online. Available HTTP: http://www.archive.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm42/4262/sli-06.htm#6.6. Accessed 27 May 2008.

  • McLaren, P. (1994). White terror and oppositional agency: Towards a critical multiculturalism. In D.T. Goldberg (Ed.), Multiculturism: A critical reader. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (1995). Critical pedagogy and predatory culture: Oppositional politics in a postmodern era. London/New York: Routldege.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P. (2008). This fist called my heart: public pedagogy in the belly of the beast. Antipode, 40(3), 472–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Farahmandpur, R. (2005). Teaching against global capitalism and the new imperialism: A critical pedagogy. Oxford: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaren, P., & Scatamburlo-D’Annibale, V. (2010). Class-ifying race: The compassionate racism of the right and why class still matters. In Z. Leonardo (Ed.), Handbook of cultural politics and education. Boston: SensePublishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, J. (2008). Statutory frameworks relating to teachers’ responsibilities. In M. Cole (Ed.), Professional attributes and practice for student teachers; meeting the QTS standards (4th ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, A. (2007, November 29). From institutional racism to community cohesion: The changing nature of racial discourse in Britain. Inaugural professorial lecture, The University of Northampton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rikowski, G. (2005, May). Silence on the Wolves: What is absent in new labour’s five year strategy for education (Occasional paper). Brighton: University of Brighton, Education Research Centre (available from ERC, University of Brighton, Mayfield House, Falmer, Brighton, BN1 9PH; email: Education. Research@brighton.ac.uk).

    Google Scholar 

  • San Juan, E. Jr. (2004, November 13). Post-9/11 reflections on multiculturalism and racism. Axis of Logic. http://www.axisoflogic.com/cgi-bin/exec/view.pl?archive=79&num=13554

  • Sarup, M. (1986). The politics of multicultural education. London: Routledge And Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sivanandan, A. (2000). UK: Reclaiming the struggle. Race and Class, 42(2), 67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suoranta, J., McLaren, P., & Jaramillo, N. (2013). Becoming a critical citizen: A Marxist–humanist critique. InH. Alexander, H. Pinson, & Y. Yonah (Eds.), Citizenship, education, and social conflict: Israeli political education in global perspective. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (1993). The downing street years. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomlinson, S. (2005). Education in a post-welfare society (2nd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyna, B. (1987). Antisexist/antiracist education—a false dilemma: A reply to walkling and Brannigan. Journal of Moral Education, 16(1), 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troyna, B. (1993). Racism and education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyna, B., & Carrington, B. (1990). Education, racism and reform. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Visram, R. (1986). Ayahs, lascars and princes. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walvin, J. (1973). Black and White: The Negro and English Society 1555–1945. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., Lafleche, M., & Berkeley, R. (Eds.). (2007). Identity, ethnic diversity and community cohesion. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yarker, P. (2008). Learning without limits—a Marxist assessment: A response to Mike Cole. Policy Futures in Education, 6(4), 464–468.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Cole, M. (2017). Multicultural and Antiracist Education in the US and the UK. In: Critical Race Theory and Education. Marxism and Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95079-9_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95079-9_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95078-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95079-9

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics