Abstract
The exposure by realist criticism of the hollowness of the utopian edifice is the first task of the political thinker. It is only when the sham has been demolished that there can be any hope of raising a more solid structure in its place. But we cannot ultimately find a resting place in pure realism; for realism, though logically overwhelming, does not provide us with the springs of action which are necessary even to the pursuit of thought. Indeed, realism itself, if we attack it with its own weapons, often turns out in practice to be just as much conditioned as any other mode of thought. In politics, the belief that certain facts are unalterable or certain trends irresistible commonly reflects a lack of desire or lack of interest to change or resist them. The impossibility of being a consistent and thorough-going realist is one of the most certain and most curious lessons of political science. Consistent realism excludes four things which appear to be essential ingredients of all effective political thinking: a finite goal, an emotional appeal, a right of moral judgement and a ground for action.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carr, E.H. (2016). The Limitations of Realism. In: Cox, M. (eds) The Twenty Years' Crisis, 1919-1939. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95076-8_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95076-8_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95075-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95076-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)