Skip to main content

Teaching Developmental Psychology with Republic

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching Psychology and the Socratic Method
  • 767 Accesses

Abstract

Plato employs the analogy of the “divided line” to illustrate the process of human development. Picture a vertical line broken into four segments. The bottom two segments represent our access to the visible realm (sensation and perception), while the top two represent our access to the intelligible (cognition and intelligence). As we develop, the intellect moves away from the visible realm and sensible particulars toward the conception of abstract essences. This Socratic distinction between the concrete-sensuous and the abstract-formal has been immensely influential in developmental psychology. Through imaginative dialogues with Socrates, students explore the extent to which modern findings from developmental psychology accord with the “upward” movement toward conceptual abstraction and generality Socrates sketched out 2400 years ago.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allott, P. (2011). On first understanding Plato’s Republic. European Journal of International Law, 22(4), 1165–1173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Annas, J. (1981). An introduction to Plato’s Republic. Oxford, UK: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney, R., Brennan, T., & Brittain, C. (2014). Plato and the divided self. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnyeat, M. F. (2006). The truth of tripartition. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 106, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crain, W. (2010). Theories of development: Concepts and applications (6th ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40(3), 266–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griggs, R. A. (2014). Psychology: A concise introduction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Worth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, S. (2012). The construction of the self: A developmental perspective. New York, NY: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morss, J. (1995). Growing critical: Alternatives to developmental psychology. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour-Smith, M. (2004). One hundred most influential books ever written. New York, NY: Barnes & Noble Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherman, D. (2013). Soul, world and idea: An interpretation of Plato’s Republic and Phaedo. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1984). Developmental psychology and the child-centered pedagogy: The insertion of Piaget’s theory into primary school practice. In J. Henriques, W. Holloway, & C. Erwin (Eds.), Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London, UK: Methuen.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dillon, J.J. (2016). Teaching Developmental Psychology with Republic . In: Teaching Psychology and the Socratic Method. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95050-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics