Skip to main content

Effects of Oil Sanctions on Iran’s Economy and Household Welfare: New Evidence from A CGE Model

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Economic Welfare and Inequality in Iran

Abstract

This chapter1 treats the economic and welfare consequences of Western-backed oil-export sanctions2 against Iran. Oil sanctions were imposed on post-revolutionary Iran with the supposed goal of changing its government’s political behavior. We aim to answer the following questions: (a) What were the likely effects of oil sanctions on the Iranian macroeconomic variables? (b) What were the likely effects of oil sanctions on Iran’s household welfare?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Akbarian, R., & Rafiee, H. (2006). An estimation of capital-labor substitution elasticity: A case of Iran manufacturing. Faslnameh Barresiha-ye eghtesadi, 3, 5–21. (in Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • AlShehabi, O. H. (2013). Modeling energy and labor linkages: A CGE approach with an application to Iran. Economic Modelling, 35, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armington, P. S. (1969). A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production. IMF Staff Papers, 16, 159–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Askari, H., Forrer, J., & Teegen, H. (2003). Economic sanctions: Examining their philosophy and efficacy. Westport, CT: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Askari, H., Forrer, J., Teegen, H., & Yang, J. (2001). US economic sanctions: Lessons from the Iranian experience. Business Economics, 36, 7–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahmani-Oskooee, M. (1996). The black market exchange rate and demand for money in Iran. Journal of Macroeconomics, 18, 171–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BBC [British Broadcasting Corporation]. (2014, March 6). Vazir-e eqtesad: Tarikib-e tavarrom va roshd-e manfi dar tarikh-e eqtesad-e keshvar bi-sabeqeh ast [Economy minister: Combination of inflation and negative growh is unprecidentd in the history of the countr’s economy]. Retrieved March 29, 2016, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/persian/business/2014/03/140306_tayebniya_economy_iran.shtml (in Persian).

  • Blonigen, B. A., Flynn, J. E., & Reinert, K. A. (1997). Sector-focused general equilibrium modeling. In J. F. Francois & K. A. Reinert (Eds.), Applied methods for trade policy analysis: A handbook (pp. 189–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • CBI [Central Bank of Iran]. (2015). Time series data tables. Retrieved December 15, 2015, from http://tsd.cbi.ir

  • Clawson, P. (1998). Iran. In R. N. Haass (Ed.), Economic sanctions and American diplomacy (pp. 85–106). New York: Council on Foreign Relations Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • CNSNews.com. (2016). Kerry: Iran has only received $3 billion, not $100B, as a result of nuclear deal. Retrieved April 24, 2016, from http://www.wsj.com

  • Daneshjafari, D., & Barghi Oskuei, M. (2009). Survey of the effects of implementing general principle 44 policies on macroeconomic variables using a CGE approach. Pazhuheshha-ye-Eghtesadi, 10, 15–38. (in Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daoudi, M. S., & Dajani, M. S. (1983). Economic sanctions: Ideals and experience. Boston, MA: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dashti-Gibso, J., Davis, P., & Radcliff, B. (1997). On the determinants of the success of economic sanctions: An empirical analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 608–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Melo, J., & Tarr, D. (1992). A general equilibrium analysis of US foreign trade policy. Massachusetts: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dervis, K., De Melo, J., & Robinson, S. (1982). General equilibrium models for development policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dizaji, S. F., & Van Bergeijk, P. A. G. (2013). Potential early phase success and ultimate failure of economic sanctions: A VAR approach with an application to Iran. Journal of Peace Research, 50, 721–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., & Engers, M. (1992). Sanctions. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 899–928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eaton, J., & Engers, M. (1999). Sanctions: Some simple analytics. American Economic Review, 89, 409–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EIU. (2016). All that glitters: Assessing opportunities and risks in postsanctions Iran. The Economist Intelligence Unit, London. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from http://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=IranRe-engagement

  • Farzanegan, M. R. (2009). Illegal trade in the Iranian economy: Evidence from a structural model. European Journal of Political Economy, 25, 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzanegan, M. R. (2011). Oil revenue shocks and government spending behavior in Iran. Energy Economics, 33, 1055–1069.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzanegan, M. R. (2013). Effects of international financial and energy sanctions on Iran’s informal economy. The SAIS Review of International Affairs, 33, 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farzanegan, M. R. (2014). Military spending and economic growth: The case of Iran. Defence and Peace Economics, 25, 247–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzanegan, M. R., & Markwardt, G. (2009). The effects of oil price shocks on the Iranian economy. Energy Economics, 31, 134–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzanegan, M. R., & Raeisian Parvari, M. (2014). Iranian-Oil-Free Zone and international oil prices. Energy Economics, 45, 364–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farzanegan, M. R., Mohammadikhabbazan, M., & Sadeghi, H. (2015). Effect of oil sanctions on the macroeconomic [indicators] and household welfare in Iran: New evidence from a CGE model. MAGKS working paper No. 07-2015, Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hubbard, L. J., & Philippidis, G. (2001). General equilibrium and the ban on British beef exports. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 52, 87–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G. C., Schott, J. J., Elliott, K. A., & Oegg, B. (2007). Economic sanctions reconsidered (3rd ed.). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, J., & Tarr, D. (2003). Trade, exchange rate and energy pricing reform in Iran: Potentially large efficiency effects and gains to the poor. Review of Development Economics, 7, 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen, L. (1960). A multi-sectoral study of economic growth. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodadadkashi, F., & Jani, S. (2011). Dynamic study of producers’ behavior in using institutions based on a two-stage CES production function, with emphasis on reforming energy consumption in production and development of employment. Faslnameh Motaleat-e-Energy, 30, 97–124. (in Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lofgren, H., Harris, R., Robinson, S., Thomas, M., & El-Said, M. (2002). A Standard Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model in GAMS. TMD Discussion Paper, 75. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, A. F., & Nash, J. (2007). Reforming agricultural trade for developing countries: Volume 1. Key issues for a pro-development outcome of the doha round. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, S., & Roberts, D. (1998). The economy-wide effects of the BSE crises: A CGE analysis. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 49, 458–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrara, M., & Barkhordari, S. (2007). The effects of Iran’s accession to WTO on employment and value added in economic sectors. Majalleh Tahghighat-e-Eghtesadi, 80, 171–194. (in Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Naghavi, A., & Pignataro, G. (2013). Theocracy and resilience against economic sanctions. Presentation at the International Symposium: Sanctions and the Iranian Political Economy. CNMS, Philipps-University of Marburg, Marburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippidis, G., & Hubbard, L. J. (2005). A dynamic computable general equilibrium treatment of the ban on UK beef exports: A note. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 56, 307–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, G. (1988). A SAM approach to modeling. Journal of Policy Modeling, 10, 327–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pyatt, G., & Round, J. (1985). Social accounting matrices: A basis for planning. Washington, DC: The World Bank Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinert, K. A., & Roland-Holst, D. W. (1997). Social accounting matrices. In J. F. Francois & K. A. Reinert (Eds.), Applied methods for trade policy analysis: A handbook (pp. 94–121). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, S., & Roland-Holst, D. W. (1988). Macroeconomic structure and computable general equilibrium models. Journal of Policy Modeling, 10, 353–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, T., Rutström, E., & Tarr, D. (1997). Morocco’s free trade agreement with the EU: A quantitative assessment. Economic Modelling, 14, 237–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi, H., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2011). Survey of probable effects of world financial crisis on Iranian rural and urban households’ income: A computable general equilibrium approach. Majalleh Tahghighat-e-Eghtesadi, 95, 79–102. (in Persian).

    Google Scholar 

  • Siddig, K. H. A. (2010). Macroeconomy and agriculture in Sudan: Analysis of trade policies, external shocks, and economic bans in a computable general equilibrium approach. Retrieved April 22, 2016, from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1684084

  • Siddig, K. H. A. (2011). From bilateral trade to multilateral pressure: A scenario of European Union relations with Sudan. Middle East Development Journal, 3, 55–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Telegraph. (2010). Iran dismisses new UN sanctions as ‘a used hanky’. Retrieved April 27, 2016, from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/iran/7816395/Iran-dismisses-new-UN-sanctions-as-a-used-hanky.html

  • The Wall Street Journal. (2016). Iran’s Central Bank Chief Warns Banking-Access Issues Jeopardize Nuclear Deal. Retrieved April 27, 2016, from http://www.wsj.com/articles/irans-central-bank-chief-warns-banking-access-issues-jeopardize-nuclear-deal-1460745930

  • Torbat, A. E. (2005). Impacts of the US trade and financial sanctions on Iran. The World Economy, 28, 407–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2013). Sanctions reduced Iran’s oil exports and revenues in 2012. Retrieved April 24, 2016, from http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.cfm?id=11011

  • UNSC [United Nations Security Council]. (2010). Resolution 1929. Retrieved April 24, 2016, from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/1929%282010%29

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farzanegan, M.R., Khabbazan, M.M., Sadeghi, H. (2016). Effects of Oil Sanctions on Iran’s Economy and Household Welfare: New Evidence from A CGE Model. In: Farzanegan, M., Alaedini, P. (eds) Economic Welfare and Inequality in Iran. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95025-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95025-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-95024-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-95025-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics