Skip to main content

Conclusion: Labor Transnationalism in Global Capitalism and Plural Institutional Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transnational Activism, Global Labor Governance, and China

Part of the book series: Non-Governmental Public Action ((NGPA))

  • 371 Accesses

Abstract

Economic globalization has undermined worker’s rights and traditional forms of worker’s power, but workers and trade unions have responded with new and innovative ways of “labor transnationalism”. This study aimed at formulating a more comprehensive picture of the largely unmapped terrain of institutional interactions and transnational activism in the field of labor. Overall, I conclude that multilevel labor-rights activism contributes to a process of selective convergence between Chinese labor politics and practices and international standards. Selective convergence means that, over time, Chinese labor law and factory practices increased its congruence with international core labor standards, while considerable discrepancies, in particular, in the understanding of freedom-of-association rights, continue to remain. This enabled labor activists to exert some influence on better working conditions, while in many cases their demands for better working conditions via worker empowernment got channeled into managerial dominated problem solution.

Therewith, the book advances literature in social movement, labor and governance studies which have started to recognize “complex internationalism” and the impact of transnational activism across borders, by further conceptualizing the complexity of international regimes as social movement environments, including the relevance of institutional interactions, multipolar power relationships, and the continuous change inherent in the governance architecture for activism. These insights have also broader political and practical implications by pointing to the potential threat from authoritarian regimes to undermine, directly and indirectly, the opportunities that organized civil societies have to participate in the current global governance architecture. The book shows that the strong interest alignments of political and economic elites favors labor rights improvements based on individual rights, taming, de-politicizing and marketizing the demands and outcomes of collective action and activism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Abbott, K.W., and D. Snidal. 2009. Strengthening International Regulation Through Transnational New Governance: Overcoming the Orchestration Deficit. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 42(2): 501–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Labor Control Regimes and Worker Resistance in Global Supply Chains. Labor History 56(3): 292–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Institutional Emergence in an Era of Globalization: The Rise of Transnational Private Regulation of Labor and Environmental Conditions. American Journal of Sociology 113: 297–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amengual, M., and L. Chirot 2016. Reinforcing the State: Transnational and State Labor Regulation in Indonesia. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, forthcoming; MIT Political Science Department Research Paper No. 2015-28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieler, A., B. Ciccaglione, J. Hilary, and I. Lindberg. 2016. Free Trade and Transnational Labour. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, M. 2013. Varieties of Power in Transnational Labor Alliances An Analysis of Workers’ Structural, Institutional, and Coalitional Power in the Global Economy. Labor Studies Journal 38(3): 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. 2010. From Polanyi to Pollyanna: The False Optimism of Global Labor Studies. Global Labour Journal 1: 301–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson, D. 2010. ‘False’ Optimism: The Key to Historic Breakthroughs? A Response to Michael Burawoy’s ‘From Polanyi to Pollyanna: The False Optimism of Global Labour Studies’(Glj 1.2). Global Labour Journal 1: 9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hond, F., and F.G.A. de Bakker. 2012. Boomerang Politics. How Transnational Stakeholders Impact Multinational Corporations in the Context of Globalization. In A Stakeholder Approach to Corporate Social Responsibility: Pressures, Conflicts, Reconciliation, ed. A. Lindgren, P. Kotler, J. Vanhamme, and F. Maon, 275–292. Aldershot: Gower Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingwerth, K. 2008. Private Transnational Governance and the Developing World: A Comparative Perspective. International Studies Quarterly 52(3): 607–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distelhorst, G., R.M. Locke, T. Pal, and H. Samel. 2015. Production Goes Global, Compliance Stays Local: Private Regulation in the Global Electronics Industry. Regulation & Governance 9(3): 224–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. Institutions and Transnationalization. In The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, ed. R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, and K. Sahlin, 299–323. Los Angeles [u.a.]: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, P. 2010. Is It Labor’s Turn to Globalize? Twenty-First Century Opportunities and Strategic Responses. Global Labour Journal 1: 352–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. National Labor Movements and Transnational Connections: Global Labor’s Evolving Architecture Under Neoliberalism. Global Labour Journal 5(3): 258–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erne, R., A. Bieler, D. Golden, I. Helle, K. Kjeldstadli, T. Matos, and S. Stan. 2015. Introduction: Politicizing the Transnational. Labor History 56: 237–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleay, C. 2006. Human Rights, Transnational Actors and the Chinese Government: Another Look at the Spiral Model. Journal of Global Ethics 2: 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T.C., and B.G. Carruthers. 2007. The Recursivity of Law: Global Norm Making and National Lawmaking in the Globalization of Corporate Insolvency Regimes. American Journal of Sociology 112: 1135–1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T., and B. Carruthers. 2009. Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, A. 2008. The Evolution of a Global Labor Governance Regime. Governance 21: 231–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, T. 2005. Labor Transnationalism and Global Governance: The Impact of Nafta on Transnational Labor Relationships in North America. American Journal of Sociology 111: 715–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Filling the Half Empty or Half Full Glass and Redirecting the Debate about Labor Transnationalism. International Studies Review 17(1): 156–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kryst, M. and Zajak, S. 2017: Mehr Staat durch Markt? Adressierungsstrategien der Anti-Sweatshop-Bewegung in Europa. In: Daphi, P., N. Deitelhoff, D. Rucht & S. Teune (Eds.): Protest in Bewegung? Zum Wandel von Bedingungen, Formen und Effekten politischen Protests. In Leviatan. Chapter 2 forthcomming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malets, O., and S. Zajak. 2014. Moving Culture: Transnational Social Movement Organisations as Translators in a Diffusion Cycle. In Conceptualizing Culture in Social Movement Research, ed. B. Baumgarten, P. Daphi, and P. Ullrich, 251–275. London & New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, P. 2016. Governing Work and Employment Relations in an Internationalized Economy The Institutional Challenge. ILR Review 69: 1033–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, F.W. 2014. Leveraging Private Governance for Public Purpose: Business, Civil Society and the State in Labour Regulation. In Handbook of the International Political Economy of Governance, ed. A. Payne, and N. Phillips, 344–360. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCallum, J.K. 2013. Global Unions, Local Power: The New Spirit of Transnational Labor Organizing. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCammon, H. 2013. Resonance, Frame. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470674871.wbespm180

  • ———. 2009. Jumping Scale and Bridging Space in the Era of Corporate Social Responsibility: Cross-Border Labour Struggles in the Global Garment Industry. Third World Quarterly 30: 599–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orsini, A., J. Morin, and O. Young. 2013. Regime Complexes: A Buzz, A Boom, or A Boost for Global Governance? Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations 19(1): 27–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. 1957. The Great Transformation. Beacon Hill: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pries, L., and M. Seeliger. 2013. Work and Employment Relations in a Globalized World: The Emerging Texture of Transnational Labour Regulation. Global Labour Journal 4: 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quack, S. 2013. Regime Complexity and Expertise in Transnational Governance: Strategizing in the Face of Regulatory Uncertainty. Oñati Socio-Legal Series 3(4): 647–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quack, S., and O. Malets. 2017 (forthcoming). Varieties of Recursivity in Transnational Governance. Global Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez-Garavito, C.A. 2005. Global Governance and Labor Rights: Codes of Conduct and Anti- Sweatshop Struggles in Global Apparel Factories in Mexico and Guatemala. Politics & Society 33: 203–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmalz, S., and K. Dörre. 2014. Der Machtressourcenansatz: Ein Instrument zur Analyse gewerkschaftlichen Handlungsvermögens/The Power Resource Approach: An Instrument to Analyze Trade Union Action Capabilities. Industrielle Beziehungen 21(3): 217–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scipes, K. (ed). 2016. Building Global Labor Solidarity in a Time of Accelerating Globalization. Chicago, IL: Haymarket Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, D.A., R.D. Benford, H.J. McCammon, et al. 2014. The Emergence, Development, and Future of the Framing Perspective: 25+ Years Since Frame Alignment. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 19(1): 23–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorge, A. 2005. The Global and the Local: Understanding the Dialectics of Business Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Targeting Organizations: Private and Contentious Politics. In Rethinking Power in Organizations, Institutions, and Markets (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, vol. 34), ed. D. Courpasson, D. Golsorkhi, and J. Sallaz, 261–285. Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Toffel, M.W., J.L. Short, and M. Ouellet. 2015. Codes in Context: How States, Markets, and Civil Society Shape Adherence to Global Labor Standards. Regulation & Governance 9: 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trubek, D.M., J. Mosher, and J.S. Rothstein. 2000. Transnationalism in the Regulation of Labor Relations: International Regimes and Transnational Advocacy Networks. Law & Social Inquiry 25: 1187–1211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uba, K., and E. Romanos. 2016. Introduction: Rethinking the Consequences of Social Movements and Cycles of Protest. Revista Internacional de Sociología 74: e044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Linden, M. 2016. Global Labour: A Not-so-grand Finale and Perhaps a New Beginning. Global Labour Journal 7(2): 201–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, E. 2015. Labour After Globalisation: Old and New Sources of Power. ISER Working Paper 2015/1: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, A. 2014. A Theory of Contestation. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Social Movements and Trade Unions in Cross-Movement Counter Mobilization. A Polanyian View on Social Movement and Trade Union Cooperation. In Social Movements and Organized Labour. Passions and Interests, edited by Jürgen R. Grote and Claudius Wagemann. The Mobilization Series on Social Movements, Protest and Culture. Adlershot [u.a]: Ashgate Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zajak, S. 2016. Institutional Layering and the Emerging Power of Labour in Bangladesh. Paper presented at the 3rd ISE Forum of Sociology, University Vienna, July.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zajak, S. (2017). Conclusion: Labor Transnationalism in Global Capitalism and Plural Institutional Settings. In: Transnational Activism, Global Labor Governance, and China. Non-Governmental Public Action. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95022-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics