Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transnational Activism within the International-Organizational Pathway. The Case of the ILO

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transnational Activism, Global Labor Governance, and China

Part of the book series: Non-Governmental Public Action ((NGPA))

  • 374 Accesses

Abstract

Chapter 3 presents an analysis of the various forms of labor-rights activism in the International Labor Organization (ILO). It distinguishes between three forms of labor activism: “activism from above” refers to how Western unions use the institutionalized ILO complaint channel; “activism from aside” points to the ILO as an arena for information exchange and discussions between international unions and the Chinese state-sponsored union, All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU); and “activism from below” comprises efforts of the local ILO office in Beijing to improve conditions and rights of workers in China. The analysis shows how these three forms of activism led to an increasing and yet selective congruence between the demands of labor advocates, the ILO agenda, and China’s labor politics, while crucial differences persist in the understanding of freedom of association. The chapter also illustrates how activism within the ILO pathway is affected by developments in other international arenas, such as the labor clause debate within the World Trade Organization (WTO), and by domestic labor law reforms within China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alston, P., ed. 2005. Labour Rights as Human Rights. Oxford [u.a.]: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieler, A., R. Erne, D. Golden, et al. (ed). 2015. Labour and Transnational Action in Times of Crisis. London: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bob, C. 2015. The United Nations. Gay Versus Anti-Gay Players in Transnational Contention. In Breaking Down the State: Protestors Engaged, ed. J.W. Duyvendak, and J.M. Jasper, 205–112. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. 2001. Labor Standards: Where Do They Belong on the International Trade Agenda? Journal of Economic Perspective 15: 89–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, C., S. Duygulu, A.H. Montgomery, and A. Rapp. 2014. Explaining the Advocacy Agenda: Insights From the Human Security Network. International Organization 68(2): 449–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnovitz, S. 2015. Reinventing the ILO. International Labour Review 154(1): 91–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, J. 2007. China and the ILO. Hong Kong: Asia Monitoring Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chianca, T., E. Marino, and C. Russon. 2011. Independent Evaluation of IlO’s Support to the Bahia Decent Work Agenda: 2008–2010. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • China Labour Bulletin. 2001. Another Blow for Labour Activists. Accessed October, 10. 2016. http://www.clb.org.hk/content/another-blow-labour-activists.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooney, S. 1998. Testing Times for the ILO: Institutional Reform for the New International Political Economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 20: 365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costello, T. 2008. Labor Charts a New Course on China. Blog Global Labor Strategies. Accessed June,12, 2014. http://www.laborstrategies.blogs.com/

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D., and S. Tarrow (ed). 2005. Transnational Protest & Global Activism. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S.F. 2003. Race to the Bottom Returns: China’s Challenge to the International Labor Movement. Cornell Law Library 10: 39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, K.A., and R.B. Freeman (ed). 2003. Can Labor Standards Improve Under Globalization? Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleay, C. 2006. Human Rights, Transnational Actors and the Chinese Government: Another Look at the Spiral Model. Journal of Global Ethics 2: 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foot, R., and A. Walter. 2010. China, the United States, and Global Order. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Global Norms and Major State Behaviour: The Cases of China and the United States. European Journal of International Relations 19: 329–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulda, A. 2009. Förderung Partizipativer Entwicklung in der VR China: Möglichkeiten und Grenzen politischer Einflussnahme durch Akteure der Deutsch-Chinesischen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (2003–2006). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. 2001. Global Political Economy. Understanding the International Economic Order. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Labour Institute. 1997. Hong Kong: Iuf Mission Report China: The Icftu and Dialogue. Geneva: Global Labour Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, A. V. M. 2009. The Effect of Ilo’s Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work on the Evolution of Legal Policy in Brazil: An Analysis of Freedom of Association. Thesis, Graduate Department of Law, University of Toronto, Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravel, E., I. Duplessis, and B. Gernigon. 2001. The Committee on Freedom of Association: Its Impact over 50 Years. Geneva: International Labour Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gu, J., J. Humphrey, and D. Messner. 2008. Global Governance and Developing Countries: The Implications of the Rise of China. World Development 36: 274–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gumbrell-McCormick, R. 2013. The International Labour Movement: Structures and Dynamics. In Trade Unionism: Building Union Power, ed. P. Fairbrother, C. Lévesque, and M.A. Hennebert, 183–202. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gumbrell-McCormick, R., and R. Hyman. 2015. International Trade Union Solidarity and the Impact of the Crisis. European Policy Analysis 1: 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, T., and B. Carruthers. 2009. Bankrupt: Global Lawmaking and Systemic Financial Crisis. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansenne, M. 1994. Promoting Social Justice in the New Global Economy. Monthly Labor Review 117(9): 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helfer, L.R. 2006. Understanding Change in International Organizations: Globalization and Innovation in the Ilo. Vanderbilt Law Review 59: 649–726.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsia, R.Y.-J., and L.T. White III. 2002. Working Amid Corporatism and Confusion: Foreign NGOs in China. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 31: 329–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICFTU (International Confederation of Free Trade Unions). 2002. ICFTU China Policy. Accessed November 20, 2015. http://www.icftu.org/displaydocument.asp?Index=991217172&Language=EN

  • ILO (International Labour Organization). 2000. Perspective on Decent Work. Accessed November 01, 2015. http://www.ilo.org/public/libdoc/ilo/2001/101B09_131_engl.pdf

  • ———. 2001. Memorandum of Understanding for Cooperation Between the International Labour Office and the Ministry of Labour and Social Security of the People’s Republic of China. Accessed November 21, 2015. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---asia/---ro-bangkok/---ilo-beijing/documents/genericdocument/wcms_144733.pdf

  • ———. 2002a. China’s Relations with the ILO. Briefing Notes for U.S. Congressional Executive China Commission Roundtable on Labor Rights. Accessed November 24, 2015. http://www.cecc.gov/sites/chinacommission.house.gov/files/documents/roundtables/2002/CECC%20Roundtable%20Testimony%20-%20Tony%20Freeman%20-%203.18.02.pdf

  • ———. 2002b. World Commission on the Social Dimension of Globalization National Dialogue: CHINA. Accessed November 01, 2015. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/wcsdg/consulta/china/report.pdf

  • ———. 2004. A Fair Globalization—Creating Opportunities for All. Accessed November 12, 2015. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/wcsdg/docs/report.pdf

  • ———. 2007. ILO-UN: Toolkit for Mainstreaming Employment and Decent Work. Accessed November 14, 2015. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---exrel/documents/publication/wcms_172609.pdf

  • ———. 2008. Corporate Social Responsibility in the Chinese Textile Industry—Compendium of Case Studies with Good Practices. Accessed November 12, 2015. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---ed_emp/---emp_ent/documents/publication/wcms_122419.pdf

  • ———. 2009. Sustaining Competitive and Responsible Enterprises (SCORE). Accessed November 12, 2015. http://www.ilo.org/beijing/what-we-do/projects/WCMS_238771/lang--en/index.htm

  • ———. 2010a. ILO’s Decent Work Country Programme in the People’s Republic of China. Accessed November 21, 2015. http://actrav-courses.itcilo.org/en/a3-05187/a3-05187-resources/decent-work-country-programme/at_download/file

  • ———. 2010b. Constitution of the International Labour Organization. Accessed November 03, 2015. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/leg/download/constitution.pdf

  • ———. 2013. Decent Work Country Programme in the People’s Republic of China 2013–2015. Accessed October 10, 2016. http://www.ilo.org/public/english/bureau/program/dwcp/download/china.pdf

  • ITUC (International Trade Union Confederation). 2004. International Labour Standards and Trade. 18th World Congress of the ICFTU. Accessed October, 11, 2016. http://www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---wcsdg/documents/event/wcms_080296.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Programme of the ITUC (Adopted by the Founding Congress of the ITUC). Accessed November 02, 2015. http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/Programme_of_the_ITUC.pdf

  • ———. 2008. International Trade Union Confederation General Council Meeting. Accessed October 30, 2015. http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/4GC_E_14_-_China.pdf

  • ———. 2010. Internationally recognized Core Labour Standards in the People’s Republic of China. Report for the WTO General Council Review of the Trade Policies of the People’s Republic of China. Accessed October 21, 2015. http://www.ituc-csi.org/IMG/pdf/Chinal_Final-2.pdf

  • ———. 2012. Annual Survey on the Violation of Trade Union Rights. Accessed October 12, 2015. http://www.ituc-csi.org/annual-survey-of-violations-of,11418

  • Kay, T. 2005. Labor Transnationalism and Global Governance: The Impact of Nafta on Transnational Labor Relationships in North America. American Journal of Sociology 111: 715–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, A. 1997. China, International Organizations and Regimes: The Ilo as a Case Study in Organizational Learning. Pacific Affairs 70: 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, A.E. 1999. China, the United Nations, and Human Rights: The Limits of Compliance. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, A. 2001. States Monitoring States: The United States, Australia, and China’s Human Rights, 1990–2001. Human Rights Quarterly 23: 583–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.S. 1994. China’s International Organizational Behaviour. Chinese Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice 85: 401–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langille, B. 2005. Core Labour Rights—The True Story. The European Journal of International Law 16(3): 409–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levi, M., and D. Olson. 2000. The Battles in Seattle. Politics Society 28: 309–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maupain, F. 2005. Revitalization Not Retreat. The Real Potential of the 1998 Ilo Declaration for the Universal Protection of Workers’ Rights’. The European Journal of International Law 16: 439–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. The Future of the International Labour Organization in the Global Economy. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. 2000. China’s Cautious Participation in the Un Human Rights Regime. Human Rights & Human Welfare 1: 23–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moorman, Y. 2000. Integration of Ilo Core Rights Labor Standards into the WTO. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 39: 555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudge, S.L. 2008. What Is Neo-Liberalism? Socioeconomic Review 6: 703–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nußberger, A. 2005. Sozialstandards im Völkerrecht. Eine Studie zu Entwicklung und Bedeutung der Normsetzung der Vereinten Nationen, der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation und des Europarats zu Fragen des Sozialschutzes. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, E., and M. Selden (ed). 2003. Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pries, L. 2010. Erwerbsregulierung in Einer Globalisierten Welt. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. Sewing Resistance: Global Production, Transnational Organsising, Global Governance in the U.S. Caribbean Basin Apparel Industry (1990–2005). Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, H. 2004. Weltwirtschaftordnung. München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, D.D.A. 1998. US Foreign Policies of Presidents Bush and Clinton: The Influence of China’s Most Favored Nation Status Upon Human Rights Issues. The Social Science Journal 35: 407–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherrer, C., and T. Greven. 2001. Global Rules for Trade: Codes of Conduct, Social Labeling, Workers’ Rights Clauses. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • SCORE China Newsletter. 2015. Accessed October 10, 2016. http://us8.campaign-archive2.com/?u=5b3287fed6963b8cf74f149d2&id=a2f70bb72b

  • Senghaas-Knobloch, E. (ed). 2005. Weltweit geltende Arbeitsstandards trotz Globalisierung. Analysen, Diagnosen und Einblicke. Münster: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senghaas-Knobloch, E., J. Dirks, and A. Liese. 2003. Internationale Arbeitsregulierung in Zeiten der Globalisierung: Politisch-Organisatorisches Lernen in der Internationalen Arbeitsorganisation (IAO), vol 17. Münster: LIT Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sikkink, K. 2005. Patterns of Dynamic Multilevel Governance. In Transnational Protest & Global Activism, ed. D.d. Porta, and S. Tarrow, 151–173. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. 2001. Globalizing Resistance: The Battle of Seattle and the Future of Social Movements. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 6: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarrow, S. 2001. Transnational Politics: Contention and Institutions in International Politics. Annual Reviews in Political Science 4: 1–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. (ed). 2008. Global Economy Contested: Power and Conflict Across the International Division of Labour. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, B., and Q. Li. 2007. Is the Acftu a Union and Does It Matter? Journal of Industrial Relations 49: 701–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teets, J.C. 2013. Let Many Civil Societies Bloom: The Rise of Consultative Authoritarianism in China. The China Quarterly 213: 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traub-Merz, R., and Eckl, J. 2007. International Trade Union Movement: Mergers and Contradictions. International Trade Union Cooperation, Briefing Papers No. 1. Friedrich-Ebert Stiftung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trebilcock, M.J. 2004. Trade Policy and Labour Standards Objectives, Instruments, and Institutions. In Hard Choices, Soft Law, ed. J.J. Kirton, and M.J. Trebilcock, 170–185. Aldershot [u.a.]: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, Y. 2004. Workers, Unions and the State: Migrant Workers in China’s Labour-Intensive Foreign Enterprises. Development and Change 35: 1011–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Social Movements, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany

    Sabrina Zajak

Authors
  1. Sabrina Zajak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Zajak, S. (2017). Transnational Activism within the International-Organizational Pathway. The Case of the ILO. In: Transnational Activism, Global Labor Governance, and China. Non-Governmental Public Action. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95022-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation