Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Studies of the Americas ((STAM))

  • 330 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of ALBA from its inception in 2004 to its decline in 2017, detailing also how ALBA relates to the theory and practice of the “postneoliberal” New Left in Latin America and the Caribbean. It argues that these ideas must be evaluated through a detailed, delineated, yet open-minded assessment of implementation, with particular attention to endogenous development, autonomy, and legitimacy (in its input, output, and control forms). It also analyses a shift in Venezuelan political economy from revolution to dissimulation, with once-successful initiatives deteriorating amidst cash flow problems, governance failings, and a hydra-headed social crisis. The idea of a postneoliberal Left Turn loses much force with its Venezuelan spearhead blunted and Ecuador’s model proving to be a far more moderate counterpoint. Ultimately, the idea of a postneoliberal wave of regionalism is undermined by the weak implementation and dubious impact of ALBA, which constitutes the theory’s principal empirical foundation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Algo para los refrescos” is the stereotypical euphemism used in requesting a bribe.

  2. 2.

    Personal interview, 30 April 2015.

  3. 3.

    The addition of “to the people” in point three is my own.

  4. 4.

    The increase in oil revenues was not only based on rising global demand but also on tax legislation enacted by the Chávez government and successful diplomatic efforts that ensured OPEC production targets were respected.

References

  • Arditi, B. 2008. Arguments About the Left Turns in Latin America: A Post-Liberal Politics? Latin American Research Review 43 (3): 59–81. https://doi.org/10.1353/lar.0.0061.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buxton, J. 2009. The Bolivarian Revolution as Venezuela’s Post-Crisis Alternative. In Governance After Neoliberalism in Latin America, ed. J. Grugel and P. Riggirozzi, 147–173. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrujas, J.I. 1987. Heterodoxia y Estado: 5 respuestas. Estado y Reforma, November. http://moebius77.com/docs/CABRUJAS-1987-El-Estado-Del-Disimulo.pdf. Accessed 10 February 2016.

  • Carrión, F. 2017. Unasur:?` Simple retórica o regionalismo efectivo? Fortalezas y debilidades. Revista AFESE 58 (58). http://www.revistaafese.org/ojsAfese/index.php/afese/article/view/341. Accessed 30 April 2017.

  • Castañeda, J.G. 2006. Latin America’s Left Turn. Foreign Affairs 85: 28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabène, O. 2012. Explaining Latin America’s Fourth Wave of Regional Integration. Congress of Latin American Studies Association, San Francisco. http://lasa.international.pitt.edu/members/congress-papers/lasa2012/files/4963.pdf. Accessed 9 May 2012.

  • Dello Buono, R., and J. Bell Lara. 2007. Neoliberalism and Resistance in Latin America. In Imperialism, Neoliberalism and Social Struggles in Latin America, ed. R. Dello Buono and J. Bell Lara, 1–13. Leiden; Boston: Brill.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Ellner, S. 2011. Venezuela’s Social-Based Democratic Model: Innovations and Limitations. Journal of Latin American Studies 43 (3): 421–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hettne, B., and F. Söderbaum. 2002. Theorising the Rise of Regionness. In New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases, ed. S. Breslin et al., 33–47. London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Karl, T.L. 1999. The Perils of the Petro-State: Reflections on the Paradox of Plenty. Journal of International Affairs 53 (1): 31–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, N. 2007. The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism. New York: Metropolitan Books/Henry Holt.

    Google Scholar 

  • López Maya, M., and L.E. Lander. 2011. Participatory Democracy in Venezuela: Origins, Ideas, and Implementation. In Venezuela’s Bolivarian Democracy: Participation, Politics, and Culture Under Chávez, ed. David Smilde and Daniel Hellinger, 58–59. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, L., and A. Ruckert, eds. 2009. Post-Neoliberalism in the Americas. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E.D., and H.V. Milner. 1999. The New Wave of Regionalism. International Organization 53 (03): 589–627. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081899551002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N. 2004. The Southern Cone Model: The Political Economy of Regional Capitalist Development in Latin America. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, N., and G.C. Prieto. 2011. The Demise of New Regionalism: Reframing the Study of Contemporary Regional Integration in Latin America. In New Regionalism and the European Union: Dialogues, Comparisons and New Research Directions, ed. A. Warleigh-Lack, N. Robinson, and B. Rosamond, 116–134. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramirez Gallegos, F. 2006. Mucho más que dos izquierdas. Nueva sociedad, 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riggirozzi, P., and D. Tussie. 2012. The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism in Latin America. In The Rise of Post-Hegemonic Regionalism: The Case of Latin America, ed. P. Riggirozzi and D. Tussie, 1–16. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sanahuja, J.A. 2008. Del regionalismo abierto al regionalismo post-liberal: crisis y cambio en la integracion en America Latina. In Anuario de la integracion regional de America Latina y el Gran Caribe, 11–54. Buenos Aires: CRIES.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serbin, A. 2011. Los nuevos escenarios de la regionalización: Déficit democrático y participación de la sociedad civil en el marco del regionalismo suramericano. Documento CRIES, 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tholen, B. 2007. RIOs, Legitimacy and Democracy: A Conceptual Clarification. In Closing or Widening the Gap? Legitimacy and Democracy in Regional Integration Organizations, ed. A. Ribeiro Hoffmann and A. van der Vleuten, 17–32. Aldershot; Burlington, VT: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tussie, D. 2009. Latin America: Contrasting Motivations for Regional Projects. Review of International Studies 35 (S1): 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026021050900847X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyland, K.G. 2010. The Performance of Leftist Governments in Latin America: Conceptual and Theoretical Issues. In Leftist Governments in Latin America: Successes and Shortcomings, ed. K.G. Weyland, R.L. Madrid, and W. Hunter, 2–27. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yates, J.S., and K. Bakker. 2014. Debating the “Post-Neoliberal Turn” in Latin America. Progress in Human Geography 38 (1): 62–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132513500372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cusack, A.K. (2019). Approaching Venezuela, ALBA, and Postneoliberalism. In: Venezuela, ALBA, and the Limits of Postneoliberal Regionalism in Latin America and the Caribbean. Studies of the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95003-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics