Breaking Barriers: Overcoming Anxieties in Practical Science
- 568 Downloads
Students can find the thought of entering a university laboratory intimidating. Here, we explore the use of digital technology to lessen such fears and offer three case studies to illustrate their impact: (a) a virtual laboratory, (b) augmented reality and (c) a virtual field trip. Referring to Laurillard’s conversational framework, we describe how each can enhance student engagement and learning.
KeywordsAugmented Reality International Student Laboratory Session Open Educational Resource Virtual Field
The authors thank the Centre for Academic and Researcher Development (CARD) at Durham University for a series of funding grants through the Enhancing the Student Learning Experience Award Scheme. In addition, we have had funding through the HE STEM scheme, and workshop funding from the HEA, which have helped to develop a national network of interest in virtual experiments. We are indebted to our summer students, Andres del Castillo Dubuc, Katherine Hurst, Hannah Wynn and Takudzwa Kawanzaruwa, without whose efforts these projects would have not been possible.
- Bacon, R. (2004). Simulations for physics and astronomy. LTSN Physical Science News, 5, 10.Google Scholar
- Bernhard, J., Carstensen, A.-K., & Holmberg, M.. (2007). Ohm’s law as a complex concept in electric circuit theory. Proceedings of AAPT summer meeting, July 28–August 1.Google Scholar
- Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations, 2, 13–17.Google Scholar
- Caudell, T. P., & Mizell, D. W. (1992). Augmented reality: An application of heads-up display technology to manual manufacturing processes. In System sciences, proceedings of the twenty-fifth Hawaii international conference (Vol. 2). Maui: IEEE.Google Scholar
- Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and micro-chemistry. School Science Review, 64, 377–379.Google Scholar
- Johnstone, A., & Al-Shuailib, A. (2001). Learning in the laboratory; Some thoughts from the literature. University Chemistry Education, 5, 42.Google Scholar
- Kind, P. M., & Osborne, J. (in press) Styles of scientific reasoning—A rationale for science education? Science Education Google Scholar
- Stott, T., Clark, H., Milson, C., McClosky, J., & Crompton, K. (2009). The Ingleton Waterfalls virtual fieldtrip: Design, development and preliminary evaluation. Teaching Earth Sciences, 34, 13–19.Google Scholar
- Tait, K. (1994). Discourse: The design and production of simulation-based learning environments. In T. de Jong & L. Sarti (Eds.), Design and production of multimedia and simulation-based learning material. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
- Theyssen, H., Aufschnaiter, S. V., & Schumacher, D. (2002). Development and evaluation in a laboratory course in physics for medical students, teaching and learning in the science laboratory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar