Advertisement

Understanding Foundation Year Provision

  • Steve Leech
  • Catherine A. Marshall
  • Geoff Wren
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter gives an overview of how UK institutions of Higher Education (HE) now offer a variety of schemes to foster wider participation. Although not a comprehensive analysis of widening participation (WP), it is a way of locating foundation programme activity in WP in general. Several pitfalls are described, including how WP efforts often focus on recruitment rather than on the students’ relevant experience.

Keywords

Academic Department Foundation Programme Entry Requirement Widening Participation Mature Student 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ainley, P. (2002). Capitalism and social progress, the future of society in a global economy. Journal of Education Policy, 17(5), 603–604. doi: 10.1080/​02680930210158348.
  2. Baker, S. (2011). Fee-averse Northerners could leave their local universities out of pocket. Times Higher Education. http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/story.asp?storycode=416877.
  3. Blanden, J., Goodman, A., Gregg, P., & Machin, S. (2004). Changes in intergenerational mobility in Britain. In M. Corak (Ed.), Generational income mobility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Boliver, V. (2011). Expansion, differentiation, and the persistence of social class inequalities in British higher education. Higher Education, 61(3), 229–242. doi: 10.1007/s10734-010-9374-y.Google Scholar
  5. Cable, V. (2011). Students at the heart of the system. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/32409/11-944-higher-education-students-at-heart-of-system.pdf.
  6. Callender, C., & Jackson, J. (2005). Does the fear of debt deter students from higher education? Journal of Social Policy, 34, 509–540. doi: 10.1017/so04727940500913x.
  7. Corver, M. (2010). Have bursaries influenced choices between universities? Retrieved October 28, 2012, from http://www.offa.org.uk/wpcontent/uploads/2010/09/Have-bursaries-influenced-choices-between-universities-.pdf.
  8. David, M. (2012). Changing policy discourses on equity and diversity in UK higher education: What is the evidence? In T. Hinton-Smith (Ed.), Widening participation in higher education: Casting the net wide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. Fuller, A., & Paton, K. (2007). Barriers to participation in higher education? Depends who you ask and how. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Institute of Education, University of London, 5–8 September 2007.Google Scholar
  10. Goldthorpe, J. H. (2013). Understanding- and misunderstanding: Social mobility in Britain: The entry of the economists, the confusion of politicians and the limits of educational policy. Journal of Social Policy, 42, 431–450. doi:  10.1017/s004727941300024x.Google Scholar
  11. Gorard, S. (2008). Who is missing from education? Cambridge Journal of Education, 38(3), 421–437.Google Scholar
  12. Halsey, A. H. (1980). Education can compensate. New Society, 51(903), 172–174.Google Scholar
  13. Hayes, K., King, E., & Richardson, J. T. E. (1997). Mature students in higher education 3. Approaches to studying in access students. Studies in Higher Education, 22(1), 19–31. doi: 10.1080/03075079712331381111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hinton-Smith, T. (Ed.). (2012). Widening participation in higher education: Casting the net wide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Houston, M., Knox, H., & Rimmer, R. (2007). Wider access and progression among full-time students. Higher Education, 53(1), 107–146. doi: 10.1007/s10734-005-3177-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Leathwood, C., & O’Connell, P. (2003). ‘It’s a struggle’: The construction of the ‘new student’ in higher education. Journal of Education Policy, 18(6), 597–615. doi: 10.1080/0268093032000145863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lucas, S. R. (2001). Effectively maintained inequality: Education transitions, track mobility, and social background effects. American Journal of Sociology, 106(6), 1642–1690. doi: 10.1086/321300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Marshall, C., & Leech, S. (2011). Comparison of Foundation Programme Models in the UK. Proceedings of the Foundation Year Network Annual Conference, Sheffield.Google Scholar
  19. Milburn, A. (2012). University challenge: How higher education can advance social mobility. London: Cabinet Office.Google Scholar
  20. Neelsen, J. P. (1975). Education and social mobility. Comparative Education Review, 19(1), 129–143. doi: 10.1086/445813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. NIACE. (2011). HE White Paper Response Friday, July 1, 2011—15:50 http://www.niace.org.uk/news/he-white-paper-%3D-niace-response.
  22. OFFA (2012). Office for Fair Access Annual report and accounts 2011–12. London: The Stationery Office.Google Scholar
  23. Osborne, M., Leopold, J., & Ferrie, A. (1997). Does access work? The relative performance of access students at a Scottish university. Higher Education, 33(2), 155–176. doi: 10.1023/a:1002927816754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Parsons, T., & Platt, G. M. (1970). Age, social structure and socialization in higher education. Sociology of Education, 43(1), 1–37. doi: 10.2307/2112057.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pollard, E., Bates, P., Hunt, W., & Bellis, A. (2008). University is not just for young people: working adults’ perceptions of and orientation to higher education, Institute for Employment Studies, DIUS Research Report 08 06, London.Google Scholar
  26. QAA. (2013). Access to higher education. From http://www.accesstohe.ac.uk/Pages/Default.aspx
  27. Raftery, A. E., & Hout, M. (1993). Maximally maintained inequality—Expansion, reform, and opportunity in Irish education, 1921–75. Sociology of Education, 66(1), 41–62. doi: 10.2307/2112784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Richardson, J. T. E. (1994a). Cultural specificity of approaches to studying in higher education—A literature survey. Higher Education, 27(4), 449–468. doi: 10.1007/bf01384904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richardson, J. T. E. (1994b). Mature students in higher education—1. A literature survey on approaches to studying. Studies in Higher Education, 19(3), 309–325. doi: 10.1080/03075079412331381900.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Richardson, J. T. E. (1994c). Mature students in higher education—Academic performance and intellectual ability. Higher Education, 28(3), 373–386. doi: 10.1007/bf01383723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Richardson, J. T. E. (1995). Mature students in higher education—Academic performance and intellectual ability. 2. An investigation into approach to studying and academic performance. Studies in Higher Education, 20(1), 5–17. doi: 10.1080/03075079512331381760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sutton Trust. (2010). Mobility manifesto. Retrieved 28/10/2012, 2012, from http://www.suttontrust.com/research/the-mobility-manifesto/
  33. Treiman, D. J. (1970). Industrialization and social stratification. Sociological Inquiry, 40(2), 207–234. doi:  10.1111/j.1475-682X.1970.tb01009.x Google Scholar
  34. Willetts, D. (2010). Statement on higher education and student funding. Retrieved February 11, 2013, from www.gov.uk/government/speeches/statement-on-higher-education-funding-and-student-finance--2
  35. Woodley, A. (2012). Wider and wider still? A historical look at open-ness of the Open University of the United Kingdom. In T. Hinton-Smith (Ed.), Widening participation in higher education: Casting the net wide. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Woodley, A., & Wilson, J. (2002). British higher education and its older clients. Higher Education, 44(3–4), 329–347. doi: 10.1023/a:1019857315244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Steve Leech
    • 1
  • Catherine A. Marshall
    • 1
  • Geoff Wren
    • 1
  1. 1.Foundation CentreUniversity of DurhamDurhamUK

Personalised recommendations