Skip to main content

Discourses of Empowerment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beyond Peacebuilding

Part of the book series: Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies ((RCS))

  • 364 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores empowerment from the perspective of its discursive function, in particular, in the agendas of development and peacebuilding. It first shows how empowerment—originally a radical concept that questioned existing patterns of domination—became a ‘technical’ concept often equated with ‘capacity building’, where donors play a crucial role. Second, it contrasts empowerment with ‘local ownership’, the preferred term in the peacebuilding policy arena. Finally, it examines the academic literature on peacebuilding, pointing out how empowerment became central in the 1990s only to be replaced later by the concept of emancipation, which accompanies the most recent critical literature in this field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

Articles, Books, Book Chapters and Reports

  • Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining democracy. Development discourse and good governance in Africa. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alsop, R. (Ed.) (2004). Power, rights, and poverty: Concepts and connections. A working meeting sponsored by DFID and the World Bank. Washington: The World Bank. London: DFID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batliwala, S. (2007). Taking the power out of empowerment—An experiential account. Development in Practice, 17(4–5), 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boege, V., Brown, A., Clements, K., & Nolan, A. (2009). On hybrid political orders and emerging states: What is failing—States in the global South or research politics in the West? Berghof Handbook for Conflict Transformation. Berghof Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, Robert (2005). Ideas for development. London: Bath Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2006). Empire in denial. The politics of state-building (pp. 1–95). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandler, D. (2013). Freedom vs. necessity in international relations. Human-centred approaches to security and development. London/New York: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., & Brock, K. (2005). Beyond buzzwords, “poverty reduction”, “participation” and “empowerment” in development policy. Overarching concerns. Programme paper number 10. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development. http://www.unrisd.org/80256B3C005BCCF9/(httpAuxPages)/F25D3D6D27E2A1ACC12570CB002FFA9A/$file/cornwall.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2010.

  • Donais, T. (2009). Empowerment or imposition? Dilemmas of local ownership in post-conflict peacebuilding processes. Peace and Change, 34(1), 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donais, T. (2012). Peacebuilding and local ownership. Post-conflict consensus-building (Studies in conflict, development and peacebuilding). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duffield, M. (2007). Development, security and unending war. Governing the world of peoples. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fetherston, A. B. (2000). Peacekeeping, conflict resolution and peacebuilding: A reconsideration of theoretical frameworks. International Peacekeeping, 7(1), 190–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, D. (2010). From pacification to peacebuilding. A call to global transformation. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1992). Empowerment the politics of alternative development. Cambridge/Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. (2004). State-building. Governance and world order in the 21st century. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fundación para las Relaciones Internacionales y el Diálogo Exterior (FRIDE). (2006). Empowerment. Development Backgrounder. Madrid. http://www.fride.org/publication/20/empowerment. Accessed 17 Jan 2013.

  • Hughes, C.; Öjendal, J.; Schierenbeck, I. (2015) The struggle versus the song – the local turn in peacebuilding: an introduction. Third World Quarterly, 36 (5), 817-824.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C., & Pupavac, V. (2005). Framing post-conflict societies: International pathologisation of Cambodia and the post-Yugoslav states. Third World Quarterly, 26(6), 873–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krause, K., & Jütersonke, O. (2005). Peace, security and development in post-conflict environments. Security Dialogue, 36(4), 447–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lausch, H. (2011). Literature review: Theories of empowerment. http://www.villageearth.org/pages/village-earth-blog/literature-review-theories-of-empowerment. Accessed 20 Dec 2014.

  • Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace. Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace. Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. Y.; Özerdem, A. (eds.) (2015) Local Ownership in International Peacebuilding. Key Theoretical and Practical Issues, Series: Studies in Conflict, Development and Peacebuilding, London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liamzon, C. (1997) An Overview of the Concept of Empowerment. In: IRED Nord People’s Empowerment – Grassroots Experiences in Africa, Asia and Latin America. Rome: Innovations et Réseaux pour le Développement (IRED), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, N. D.; Denham, N; Travers, C., Ackers, P. and Wilkinson, A. (2002) The Meaning of Empowerment: the Interdisciplinary Etymology of a New Management Concept. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(3): 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopes, C. (2002). Should we mind the gap? In S. Fukuda-Parr, C. Lopes, & K. Malik (Eds.), Capacity for development: New solutions to old problems (pp. 121–146). New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell, C., & Quiroz, S., with Scrutton, C., & Bird, K. (2009). Understanding and operationalising empowerment (Working paper 308). Results of ODI research presented in preliminary form for discussion and critical comment. London: Overseas Development. Available at: https://www.odi.org/resources/docs/5500.pdf. Accessed: 11 July 216.

  • Mac Ginty, R. (2011). Hybrid peace: How does hybrid peace come about. In S. Campbell, D. Chandler, & M. Sabaratnam (Eds.), A liberal peace? The problems and practices of peacebuilding (pp. 209–225). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mac Ginty, R., & Richmond, O. P. (2013). The local turn in peace building: A critical agenda for peace. Third World Quarterly, 34(5), 763–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narayan, D. (ed.) (2002) Empowerment and Poverty Reduction. A Sourcebook. Washington: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development/ The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (1996). Shaping the 21st century, Paris, OECD. http://www.oecd.org/dac/2508761.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.

  • Paffenholz, T. (2014) International peacebuilding goes local: analysing Lederach’s conflict transformation theory and its ambivalent encounter with 20 years of practice, Peacebuilding, 2(1), 11–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paffenholz, T. (2015). Unpacking the local turn in peacebuilding: A critical assessment towards an agenda for future research. Third World Quarterly, 36(5), 857–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paris, R. (2004). At war’s end. Building peace after civil conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, J. N. (1992). Emancipations, modern and postmodern. Development and Change, 23(3), 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pieterse, J. N. (2010). Development theory (2nd ed.). Los Angeles/London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pugh, M., Cooper, N., & Turner, M. (Eds.) (2011). Whose peace? Critical perspectives on the political economy of peacebuilding (2nd ed.). New security challenges series. In S. Croft (Ed.), Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 393–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T., & Miall, H. (2007). Contemporary conflict resolution (2nd ed.). Cambridge/Malde: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2006). Patterns of peace. Global Society, 20(4), 367–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2009). A post-liberal peace: Eirenism and the everyday. Review of International Studies, 35, 557–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2011). A post-liberal peace. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2012). Beyond local ownership in the architecture of international peacebuilding. Ethnopolitics, 11(4), 354–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, O. P. (2014). Failed statebuilding. Intervention, the state, and the dynamics of peace formation. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2011a). Beyond the metropolis? Popular peace and post-conflict peacebuilding. Review of International Studies, 37(5), 2535–2556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, D. (2011b). Post-conflict peacebuilding, liberal irrelevance and the locus of legitimacy. International Peacekeeping, 18(4), 410–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, J. (1997). Questioning empowerment. Working with women in Honduras. Oxford: Oxfam.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, G. (1997). Empowerment as an approach to poverty (Working Paper Series No. 97.07). Background Paper to the Human Development Report. Available at: Available at: http://www.ieham.org/html/docs/Empowerment_as_an_approach_to_Poverty.pdf. Accessed: 11 July 2016.

  • Shinoda, H. (2015). Local ownership as a strategic guideline for peacebuilding. In S. Y. Lee & A. Özerdem (Eds.), Local ownership in international peacebuilding. Key theoretical and practical issues (Studies in conflict, development and peacebuilding, pp. 19–38). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., Cooper, N., & Pugh, M. (2011). Institutionalised and co-opted. Why human security has lost its way. In D. Chandler & N. Hynek (Eds.), Critical perspectives on human security. Rethinking emancipation and power in international relations (New security studies, pp. 83–96). New York: PRIO/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1992). An agenda for peace: Preventive diplomacy, peacemaking and peace-keeping. UN Doc A/47/277-S/2411. http://www.un.org/Docs/SG/agpeace.html. Accessed 15 Nov 2009.

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1990). Human development report 1990. Concept and measurement of human development. New York: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1995). Human development report 1995. Gender and human development. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (1997). Human development report 1997. Human development to eradicate poverty. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2000). Human development report. Human rights and human development. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Development Program (UNDP). (2010). Human development report 2010. 20th anniversary edition. The real wealth of nations: Pathways to human development. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, E. M. (1988). Capitalism and human emancipation. New Left Review, 1(167), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse, T. (2010). Adam Curle: Radical peacemaker and pioneer of peace studies. Journal of Conflictology, 1(1), 1–8. Campus for Peace, UOC. http://www.uoc.edu/ojs/index.php/journal-of-conflictology/article/view/vol1iss1-woodhouse/vol1iss1-woodhouse. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Roberta Holanda Maschietto

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maschietto, R.H. (2016). Discourses of Empowerment. In: Beyond Peacebuilding . Rethinking Peace and Conflict Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94951-9_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics