Skip to main content

The Return of Geopolitics and Relations to the East

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: European Administrative Governance ((EAGOV))

Abstract

Geopolitics is often associated with realism and for this reason not readily associated with the EU. The notion is, however, often associated with ideas of exclusion. This chapter argues that geopolitical perspectives are relevant to the EU if Richard Youngs’ notion of the ‘geopolitics of inclusion’ and Luis Simons’ idea of ‘middle spaces’ are embraced. This chapter argues that the EU and its members have become default geopolitical actors since they are perceived to be such, most notably by President Putin. The development of the EU’s Eastern Partnership from 2004 onwards coincided with a period of strategic unconsciousness, when there was a general failure to think through the impact of the Union’s economic, political and even security engagement with Russia’s ‘near abroad’. This was a major contributory factor to the Maidan revolution in Ukraine, the subsequent Russian annexation of Crimea and the parlous state of the Donbass region. Engagement with Russia will be difficult, but also necessary. This will require a keener awareness of the EU’s interests in the neighbourhood and how these relate to Russia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • BBC News. 2014. President Putin Urges Russian Resilience for Hard Times, BBC News Europe, 4 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawisha, K. 2014. Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. 2008. Global Disruptors: Steering through the Storms, Economist Intelligence Unit Briefing Paper, October.

    Google Scholar 

  • EEAS. 2015. The EU in a Changing Global Environment: A More Connected, Contested and Complex World, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/docs/strategic_review/eu-strategic-review_strategic_review_en.pdf

  • ———. 2016. EU vs Disinformation, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/euvsdisinfo/

  • European Commission. 2015. Joint Consultation Paper: Towards a new European Neighbourhood Policy, European Commission and High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, JOIN(2015)6 final, Brussels, 4 March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Financial Times. 2014. Lunch with the FT: Donald Tusk, 28 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, F. 1989. The End of History, The National Interest, Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorbachev, M 1997. European Security and How to Reach It. The Brown Journal of World Affairs IV(1, Winter/Spring): 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. M. 1989. Europe as a Common Home, Address by Mikhail Gorbachev to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 6 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, G.M. 2014. Putin Is Moving Away from Hard-Line Siloviki, The Moscow Times, 3 December.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, L. 2014. Georgia Angered by Russia-Abkhazia Military Agreement, The Guardian, 25 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • House of Lords. 2015. The EU and Russia: Before and Beyond the Crisis in Ukraine, EU Committee, 6th Report of Session 2014–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ikenberry, J. 2014. The Ilusion of Geopolitics: The Enduring Power of Liberal Order. Foreign Affairs 93(3, May/June): 80–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, S. 2014a. Why Global Europe Must Change in an “Anxious Age”, Friends of Europe, 4 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacFarland, N., and A. Menon.2014. The EU and Ukraine. Survival 56(3): 95–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackinder, H.J. 1904. The Geographical Pivot of History. The Geographical Journal 23(4, April): 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, W.R. 2014. The Return of Geopolitics: The Revenge of the Revisionist Powers. Foreign Affairs 93(3, May/June): 69–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J. 2014. Why Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. Foreign Affairs 93(5, September/October): 77–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mogherini, F 2014. Statement by the High-Representative/Vice-President on the Signature of a “Treaty on Alliance and Strategic Partnership” between the Russian Federation and Georgia’s Breakaway Region of Abkhazia, 121124_01_en, Brussels, 24 November.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Security Strategy. 2015. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, White House, Washington, February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popescu, N. 2014. Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely, Chaillot Papers, September. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putin, V. 2007. Putin’s Prepared Remarks at 43rd Munich Conference on Security Policy. Washington Post, 12 February, available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/12/AR2007021200555.html

  • Putin, V. 2014. Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club, Sochi, 24 October, available at http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/23137

  • Sakwa, R. 2015b. The Death of Europe? Continental Fates after Ukraine. International Affairs 91(3, May): 553–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simón, L. 2015. Europe, the Rise of Asia and the Future Transatlantic Relationship. International Affairs 91(5): 969–989.Sputnik. 2015. New Iron Curtain: EU Leaders to Shield Europe from 'Kremlin Propaganda', 4 May, available at http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150504/1021695630.html . 

    Google Scholar 

  • Trenin, D. 2001. The End of Eurasia: Russia on the Border Between Geopolitics and Globalization. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ham, P. 2015. The EU, Russia and the Quest for a New European Security Bargain, Clingendael Report, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vimont, P. 2015. The Path to an Upgraded EU Foreign Policy, Policy Outlook, Carnegie Europe, June.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yost, D.S. 2015. The Budapest Memorandum and Russia’s Intervention in Ukraine. International Affairs 91(3, May): 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Youngs, R.2015. The EU: Inclusion as Geopolitics. In Geopolitics and Democracy in the Middle East, ed. K. Kausch, 115–129. Madrid: FRIDE.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Duke .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Duke, S. (2017). The Return of Geopolitics and Relations to the East. In: Europe as a Stronger Global Actor . European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94945-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics