Abstract
Geopolitics is often associated with realism and for this reason not readily associated with the EU. The notion is, however, often associated with ideas of exclusion. This chapter argues that geopolitical perspectives are relevant to the EU if Richard Youngs’ notion of the ‘geopolitics of inclusion’ and Luis Simons’ idea of ‘middle spaces’ are embraced. This chapter argues that the EU and its members have become default geopolitical actors since they are perceived to be such, most notably by President Putin. The development of the EU’s Eastern Partnership from 2004 onwards coincided with a period of strategic unconsciousness, when there was a general failure to think through the impact of the Union’s economic, political and even security engagement with Russia’s ‘near abroad’. This was a major contributory factor to the Maidan revolution in Ukraine, the subsequent Russian annexation of Crimea and the parlous state of the Donbass region. Engagement with Russia will be difficult, but also necessary. This will require a keener awareness of the EU’s interests in the neighbourhood and how these relate to Russia.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
BBC News. 2014. President Putin Urges Russian Resilience for Hard Times, BBC News Europe, 4 December.
Dawisha, K. 2014. Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia? New York: Simon and Schuster.
Economist Intelligence Unit. 2008. Global Disruptors: Steering through the Storms, Economist Intelligence Unit Briefing Paper, October.
EEAS. 2015. The EU in a Changing Global Environment: A More Connected, Contested and Complex World, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/docs/strategic_review/eu-strategic-review_strategic_review_en.pdf
———. 2016. EU vs Disinformation, available at http://eeas.europa.eu/euvsdisinfo/
European Commission. 2015. Joint Consultation Paper: Towards a new European Neighbourhood Policy, European Commission and High Representative of the EU for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, JOIN(2015)6 final, Brussels, 4 March.
Financial Times. 2014. Lunch with the FT: Donald Tusk, 28 November.
Fukuyama, F. 1989. The End of History, The National Interest, Summer.
Gorbachev, M 1997. European Security and How to Reach It. The Brown Journal of World Affairs IV(1, Winter/Spring): 257–269.
———. M. 1989. Europe as a Common Home, Address by Mikhail Gorbachev to the Council of Europe, Strasbourg, 6 July.
Hahn, G.M. 2014. Putin Is Moving Away from Hard-Line Siloviki, The Moscow Times, 3 December.
Harding, L. 2014. Georgia Angered by Russia-Abkhazia Military Agreement, The Guardian, 25 November.
House of Lords. 2015. The EU and Russia: Before and Beyond the Crisis in Ukraine, EU Committee, 6th Report of Session 2014–15.
Ikenberry, J. 2014. The Ilusion of Geopolitics: The Enduring Power of Liberal Order. Foreign Affairs 93(3, May/June): 80–90.
Islam, S. 2014a. Why Global Europe Must Change in an “Anxious Age”, Friends of Europe, 4 September.
MacFarland, N., and A. Menon.2014. The EU and Ukraine. Survival 56(3): 95–101.
Mackinder, H.J. 1904. The Geographical Pivot of History. The Geographical Journal 23(4, April): 421–437.
Mead, W.R. 2014. The Return of Geopolitics: The Revenge of the Revisionist Powers. Foreign Affairs 93(3, May/June): 69–79.
Mearsheimer, J. 2014. Why Ukraine Crisis Is the West’s Fault. Foreign Affairs 93(5, September/October): 77–90.
Mogherini, F 2014. Statement by the High-Representative/Vice-President on the Signature of a “Treaty on Alliance and Strategic Partnership” between the Russian Federation and Georgia’s Breakaway Region of Abkhazia, 121124_01_en, Brussels, 24 November.
National Security Strategy. 2015. National Security Strategy of the United States of America, White House, Washington, February.
Popescu, N. 2014. Eurasian Union: The Real, the Imaginary and the Likely, Chaillot Papers, September. Paris: EU Institute for Security Studies.
Putin, V. 2007. Putin’s Prepared Remarks at 43rd Munich Conference on Security Policy. Washington Post, 12 February, available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/12/AR2007021200555.html
Putin, V. 2014. Meeting of the Valdai International Discussion Club, Sochi, 24 October, available at http://eng.kremlin.ru/news/23137
Sakwa, R. 2015b. The Death of Europe? Continental Fates after Ukraine. International Affairs 91(3, May): 553–581.
Simón, L. 2015. Europe, the Rise of Asia and the Future Transatlantic Relationship. International Affairs 91(5): 969–989.Sputnik. 2015. New Iron Curtain: EU Leaders to Shield Europe from 'Kremlin Propaganda', 4 May, available at http://sputniknews.com/politics/20150504/1021695630.html .
Trenin, D. 2001. The End of Eurasia: Russia on the Border Between Geopolitics and Globalization. Washington, DC: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
van Ham, P. 2015. The EU, Russia and the Quest for a New European Security Bargain, Clingendael Report, November.
Vimont, P. 2015. The Path to an Upgraded EU Foreign Policy, Policy Outlook, Carnegie Europe, June.
Yost, D.S. 2015. The Budapest Memorandum and Russia’s Intervention in Ukraine. International Affairs 91(3, May): 489–505.
Youngs, R.2015. The EU: Inclusion as Geopolitics. In Geopolitics and Democracy in the Middle East, ed. K. Kausch, 115–129. Madrid: FRIDE.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Duke, S. (2017). The Return of Geopolitics and Relations to the East. In: Europe as a Stronger Global Actor . European Administrative Governance. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94945-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94945-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-94944-1
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94945-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)