Advertisement

Civil Society and the UN Security Council: Advocacy on the Rwandan Genocide

  • Kseniya Oksamytna
Chapter
Part of the International Series on Public Policy book series (ISPP)

Abstract

The chapter analyses how non-governmental organizations (NGOs) campaigned for a stronger United Nations (UN) response to the 1994 Rwandan genocide. It begins by reviewing the relationship between civil society and the UN Security Council. It discusses three aspects of this relationship: the channels of access (for instance, the NGO Working Group on the Security Council and the so-called Arria formula meetings), the strategies of engagement, and the degree of influence. It explores how NGOs, such as Human Rights Watch, Médecins Sans Frontières, and Oxfam, appealed to permanent and non-permanent members of the UN Security Council, as well as the broader public, for a more decisive UN action against the 1994 genocide in Rwanda.

Keywords

Civil Society United Nations Security Council Council Member Civil Society Actor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ancil, A.-P., Clements, K., Piza-Lopez, E., & Johnston, N. (2004). Legitimizing the role of women in peacebuilding at the United Nations: A campaign approach. In M. Fitzduff & C. Church (Eds.), NGOs at the table: Strategies for influencing policies in areas of conflict. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
  2. Barnett, M., & Finnemore, M. (2004). Rules for the world: International organizations in global politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Binder, M. (2008, August). The politicization of international security institutions: The UN security council and NGOs. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Carey, H. F. (2001). “Women and peace and security”: The politics of implementing gender sensitivity norms in peacekeeping. International Peacekeeping, 8(2), 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charnovitz, S. (2000). Opening the WTO to nongovernmental interests. Fordham International Law Journal, 24(1–2), 173–216.Google Scholar
  6. Deitelhoff, N. (2009). The discursive process of legalization: Charting islands of persuasion in the ICC Case. International Organization, 63(1), 33–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Des Forges, A. (1999). Leave none to tell the story: Genocide in Rwanda. New York: Human Rights Watch.Google Scholar
  8. Des Forges, A. (2004). Learning from disaster: U.S. human rights policy in Rwanda. In D. Liang-Fenton (Ed.), Implementing U.S. human rights policy: Agendas, policies, and practices. Washington, DC: US Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  9. Destexhe, A. (1994). Rwandans die while the U.N. procrastinates. New York Times, Retrieved August 13, 2013, from http://www.nytimes.com/1994/05/23/opinion/l-rwandans-die-while-the-un-procrastinates-167290.html
  10. Findlay, T. (2002). The use of force in UN peace operations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Global Policy Forum. (2013). Arria formula and other UN Proceedings. Retrieved May 14, 2013, from http://www.globalpolicy.org/security-council/ngos-and-the-council/arria-formula-and-other-un-proceedings.html
  12. Graubart, J. (2008). NGOs and the security council: Authority all around but for whose benefit? In B. Cronin & I. Hurd (Eds.), The UN security council and the politics of international authority. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Hill, F., Aboitiz, M., & Poehlman-Doumbouya, S. (2003). Nongovernmental organizations’ role in the buildup and implementation of security council resolution 1325. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(4), 1255–1269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hilsum, L. (2007). Reporting Rwanda: The media and the aid agencies. In A. Thompson (Ed.), The media and the Rwanda genocide. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  15. Johnstone, I. (2003). The role of the UN secretary-general: The power of persuasion based on law. Global Governance, 9(4), 441–458.Google Scholar
  16. Keating, C. (2004). Rwanda: An insider’s account. In D. Malone (Ed.), The UN security council: From the cold war to the 21st century. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  17. Keck, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). Activists beyond borders: Advocacy networks in international politics. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Kovanda, K. (2010). The Czech Republic on the UN security council: The Rwandan genocide. Genocide Studies and Prevention, 5(2), 192–218.Google Scholar
  19. Labonte, M. (2013). Human rights and humanitarian norms, strategic framing, and intervention: Lessons for the responsibility to protect. Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Malone, D. (2000). The security council in the 1990s: Inconsistent, improvisational, indispensable? In R. Thakur & E. Newman (Eds.), New millennium, new perspectives: The United Nations security and governance. New York: UN University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Martens, K. (2004). An appraisal of amnesty international’s work at the United Nations: Established areas of activities and shifting priorities since the 1990s. Human Rights Quarterly, 26(4), 1050–1070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Melvern, L. (2000). A people betrayed: The role of the west in Rwanda’s genocide. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  23. Melvern, L. (2002). Briefing before the committee on conscience of the United States holocaust memorial museum. Retrieved October 12, 2014, from http://www.ushmm.org/confront-genocide/speakers-and-events/all-speakers-and-events/briefing-by-linda-melvern
  24. Melvern, L. (2007). Missing the story: The media and the Rwanda genocide. In A. Thompson (Ed.), The media and the Rwanda genocide. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
  25. Mertus, J. (2005). The United Nations and human rights: A guide for a new era. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. NGO Working Group on the Security Council. (2010). Information Statement. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://www.ngowgsc.org/content/information-statement
  27. Niemetz, M. D. (2015). Reforming UN decision-making procedures: Promoting a deliberative system for global peace and security. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Otto, D. (2010). Power and danger: Feminist engagement with international law through the UN security council. Australian Feminist Law Journal, 32(1), 97–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paul, J. A. (2003). The Arria formula. Retrieved December 13, 2015, from http://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/185/40088.html
  30. Paul, J. A. (2004a). NGOs and the security council. Retrieved April 13, 2015, from https://www.globalpolicy.org/security-council/40406-ngos-and-the-security-council.html
  31. Paul, J. A. (2004b). Working with nongovernmental organizations. In D. Malone (Ed.), The UN security council: From the cold war to the 21st century. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  32. Paul, J. A. (2010). A short history of the NGO working group. Retrieved March 27, 2015, from http://www.ngowgsc.org/content/short-history-ngo-working-group
  33. Rixen, T., & Zangl, B. (2013). The politicization of international economic institutions in us public debates. The Review of International Organizations, 8(3), 363–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Security Council Report. (2007). Special Research Report No. 3: Security Council Transparency, Legitimacy and Effectiveness, Retrieved July 6, 2016, from http://www.securitycouncilreport.org
  35. Security Council Report. (2015). Arria-Formula Meetings, 1992–2015, Retrieved December 14, 2015, from http://www.securitycouncilreport.org
  36. Shepherd, L. J. (2008). Power and authority in the production of United Nations security council resolution 1325. International Studies Quarterly, 52(2), 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sievers, L., & Daws, S. (2014). The procedure of the UN security council (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Steffek, J. (2013). Explaining cooperation between IGOs and NGOs—Push factors, pull factors, and the policy cycle. Review of International Studies, 39(4), 993–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tallberg, J., Sommerer, T., Squatrito, T., & Jönsson, C. (2013). The opening up of international organizations: Transnational access in global governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. True-Frost, C. (2007). The security council and norm consumption. New York University Journal of Legislation and Public Policy, 40, 115–217.Google Scholar
  41. Tryggestad, T. L. (2009). Trick or treat? The UN and implementation of security council resolution 1325 on women, peace, and security. Global Governance, 15(4), 539–557.Google Scholar
  42. UK Mission to the UN. (1994). Memo on Rwanda. Retrieved December 12, 2015, from http://nsarchive.gwu.edu/NSAEBB/NSAEBB472/pdf/uk1481.pdf
  43. UN Security Council. (1994). Resolution 925. Retrieved December 13, 2015, from http://www.un.org/en/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=S/RES/925
  44. Von Riekhoff, H. (2002). Canada and the United Nations security council, 1999–2000—A reassessment. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 10(1), 71–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Walling, C. B. (2013). All necessary measures: The United Nations and humanitarian intervention. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Zürn, M., Binder, M., & Ecker-Ehrhardt, M. (2012). International authority and its politicization. International Theory, 4(1), 69–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kseniya Oksamytna
    • 1
  1. 1.University of WarwickWarwickUK

Personalised recommendations