Abstract
The term “a public trust” has long had strong resonance in the characterization of public-service broadcasting. The authors argue that public broadcasting in the USA can and should become a place to which all Americans can turn to meet their critical information needs. However, for it to become a true “public trust,” major federal policy and structural changes must be made. The chapter highlights a series of external constraints in federal communications policy, along with parallel internal issues in the structure and processes of public broadcasting itself. In the end, the chapter will suggest a few changes that might help public media better capitalize on the public’s trust—to help it earn a better base of material support and thereby to find an even larger and more stable place for itself in serving the information needs of the nation.
Note: This chapter is drawn largely from the author’s Ralph L. Crosman Lecture, “A Public Trust in Jeopardy: An Insider’s Look at The Unresolved Constraints on U.S. Public Media,” at the University of Colorado Boulder, April 23, 2013. The author wishes to acknowledge Mark Lloyd’s considerable assistance in editing this abridged version.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allen, Frederick L. 1931. Only yesterday: An informal history of the nineteen-twenties. New York: Blue Ribbon Books.
Blakely, Robert J. 1979. To serve the public interest: Educational broadcasting in the United States. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.
Carnegie Commission on Educational Television. 1967. Public television: A program for action [Carnegie I]. New York: Bantam Books.
Carnegie Commission on the Future of Public Broadcasting. 1979. A public trust [Carnegie II]. New York: Bantam Books.
Federal Communications Commission. 2010a. The future of the media and the information needs of communities in the digital age. Public Notice DA 10–100, GN Docket No. 10–25. January 21.
Federal Communications Commission. 2010b. Connecting America: The national broadband plan. March 17.
Gunn Jr., Hartford N., G.G. Crotts, P.M. Fannon, M.E. Hobbs, M.B. Rice, W.D. Rowland Jr., and G.V. Schenkkan. 1980. In search of the formula: The system planning project papers. Public Telecommunications Review 8(3): 7–102.
Public Broadcasting Service. 2015. Today’s PBS: Trusted, valued, essential. http://to.pbs.org/most_trusted_2015
Public Law 90–129, 90th Congress, November 7, 1967. As amended to April 26, 1968.
Rowland Jr., Willard D. 1996. The meaning of ‘the public interest’ in communications policy – Part I: Its origins in state and federal regulation. Communications Law & Policy 2(3): 309–328.
Twentieth Century Fund. 1993. Quality time? The report of the twentieth century fund task force on public television. New York: Twentieth Century Fund Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rowland, W.D.“. (2016). A Public Trust Unrealized: The Unresolved Constraints on US Public Media. In: Lloyd, M., Friedland, L. (eds) The Communication Crisis in America, And How to Fix It. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94925-0_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94925-0_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-94924-3
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94925-0
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)