Abstract
As we move resolutely into a Big Data age, it appears that a sense of ‘panoptic panic’, boosted by the Snowden revelations, about the expanding capabilities of our intelligence agencies is growing amongst sections of the public. Law enforcers and security officials will often speak about the need to amass large amounts of data to find needles in haystacks, but civil libertarians and cyber-utopianists warn of a slide towards Orwellian powers of mass surveillance. Big Data implies an epistemological shift in data analysis, and opens up new opportunities for security agencies to become more proactive and pre-emptive. This chapter argues that, while the risks of such a move must be recognised, we must also be able to deliver security responsibly.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Barlow, J.P. (1996, February 8). A declaration of the independence of Cyberspace. Davos. Retrieved October 22, 2015, from https://projects.eff.org/~barlow/Declaration-Final.html
BBC. (2015, January 18). Nick Clegg defends opposition to ‘snoopers’ charter. Retrieved July 16, 2015, from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30870442
Beck, U. (2002). The terrorist threat: World risk society revisited. Theory, Culture and Society, 19(4), 39–55.
Butler, D. (2013). When Google got flu wrong. Nature, 494(7436), 155–156.
CNN. (2002). Bush State of the Union address. Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://edition.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/01/29/bush.speech.txt/
Deleuze, G. (1992). Postscript on the societies of control. October, 59, 3–7.
Huppert, J. (2012, December 11). Communications Data Bill cannot proceed. Liberal Democrat Voice. Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://www.libdemvoice.org/julian-huppert-mp-writes-the-data-communications-bill-as-it-is-simply-cannot-proceed-32103.html
Kerr, I., & Earle, J. (2013). Prediction, preemption, presumption: How Big Data threatens big picture privacy. Stanford Law Review Online, 66(65).
Lyon, D. (2014, July–December). Surveillance, Snowden, and Big Data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data and Society.
Omand, D. (2012). Securing the state. London: C. Hurst and Co.
Richards, J. (2012). A guide to national security: Threats, responses and strategies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The Guardian. (2014, July 15). Academics: UK ‘Drip’ data law changes are ‘serious expansion of surveillance. Retrieved July 17, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/15/academics-uk-data-law-surveillance-bill-rushed-parliament
Zwitter, A. (2014, July–December). Big Data ethics. Big Data and Society.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Richards, J. (2016). Needles in Haystacks: Law, Capability, Ethics, and Proportionality in Big Data Intelligence-Gathering. In: Bunnik, A., Cawley, A., Mulqueen, M., Zwitter, A. (eds) Big Data Challenges. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94885-7_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94885-7_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-94884-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94885-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)