Advertisement

The Network Effect on Ethics in the Big Data Age

  • Andrej Zwitter
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter emphasises the radical departure that the Big Data age signifies for researchers, corporates, and public bodies alike. It argues that the nature of Big Data and the means of analysis raise their own specific ethical problems that nowadays go beyond the privacy consideration of the individual. Instead, these changes raise questions about the privacy of communities against the collecting and tracking of group and network data, the security from manipulation, and education for appropriate internet use. The chapter reflects on whether our ethical frameworks still match the Big Data age. It concludes that we might need to redevelop individualistic ethical norms to match a network logic of power and responsibility.

Keywords

Big Data Ethics Corporate moral agency Network ethics Network theory Legal frameworks Social network services Moral network agency 

References

  1. Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.Google Scholar
  3. Downie, R. S. (1969). Collective responsibility. Philosophy, 44, 66–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Erskine, T. (2001). Assigning responsibilities to institutional moral agents: The case of states and quasi-states. Ethics & International Affairs, 15(2), 67–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Erskine, T. (2010). Kicking bodies and damning souls: The danger of harming ‘innocent’ individuals while punishing ‘delinquent’ states. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(3), 261–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Goodman, M. (2015). Future crimes: Everything is connected, everyone is vulnerable and what we can do about it. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, Ebook.Google Scholar
  7. Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California. Retrieved August 29, 2013, from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/C10_Centrality.html
  8. Hobbes, T. (2001). The Harvard classics (Of man, being the first part of Leviathan, Vol. 34, Pt. 5). New York: P.F. Collier & Son.Google Scholar
  9. Lewis, H. D. (1948). Collective responsibility. Philosophy, 24, 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Noorman, M., (2012). Computing and moral responsibility. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/computing-responsibility
  11. Vallor, S. (2010). Social networking technology and the virtues. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(2), 157–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Zwitter, A. (2013). Ethical research in law and politics: Methodological pitfalls. In H. Bashir, P. Gray, & E. Masad (Eds.), Co-existing in a globalized world (pp. 47–62). Plymouth: Lexington Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrej Zwitter
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceUniversity of GroningenThe NetherlandsUK

Personalised recommendations