Abstract
This chapter emphasises the radical departure that the Big Data age signifies for researchers, corporates, and public bodies alike. It argues that the nature of Big Data and the means of analysis raise their own specific ethical problems that nowadays go beyond the privacy consideration of the individual. Instead, these changes raise questions about the privacy of communities against the collecting and tracking of group and network data, the security from manipulation, and education for appropriate internet use. The chapter reflects on whether our ethical frameworks still match the Big Data age. It concludes that we might need to redevelop individualistic ethical norms to match a network logic of power and responsibility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bonacich, P. (1987). Power and centrality: A family of measures. American Journal of Sociology, 92(5), 1170–1182.
Castells, M. (2011). A network theory of power. International Journal of Communication, 5, 773–787.
Downie, R. S. (1969). Collective responsibility. Philosophy, 44, 66–69.
Erskine, T. (2001). Assigning responsibilities to institutional moral agents: The case of states and quasi-states. Ethics & International Affairs, 15(2), 67–85.
Erskine, T. (2010). Kicking bodies and damning souls: The danger of harming ‘innocent’ individuals while punishing ‘delinquent’ states. Ethics & International Affairs, 24(3), 261–285.
Goodman, M. (2015). Future crimes: Everything is connected, everyone is vulnerable and what we can do about it. New York: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group, Ebook.
Hanneman, R. A., & Riddle, M. (2005). Introduction to social network methods. Riverside, CA: University of California. Retrieved August 29, 2013, from http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/nettext/C10_Centrality.html
Hobbes, T. (2001). The Harvard classics (Of man, being the first part of Leviathan, Vol. 34, Pt. 5). New York: P.F. Collier & Son.
Lewis, H. D. (1948). Collective responsibility. Philosophy, 24, 3–18.
Noorman, M., (2012). Computing and moral responsibility. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Fall ed.). Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/computing-responsibility
Vallor, S. (2010). Social networking technology and the virtues. Ethics and Information Technology, 12(2), 157–170.
Zwitter, A. (2013). Ethical research in law and politics: Methodological pitfalls. In H. Bashir, P. Gray, & E. Masad (Eds.), Co-existing in a globalized world (pp. 47–62). Plymouth: Lexington Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zwitter, A. (2016). The Network Effect on Ethics in the Big Data Age. In: Bunnik, A., Cawley, A., Mulqueen, M., Zwitter, A. (eds) Big Data Challenges. Palgrave, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94885-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94885-7_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-349-94884-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94885-7
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)