Skip to main content

Annuities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Finance and Occupational Pensions
  • 493 Accesses

Abstract

An annuity provides a stream of payments until the death of the annuitant (pensioner). The price of annuities is strongly influenced by expectations at the time of purchase of the long-term interest rate on bonds. It also varies with the gender and age of the pensioner, as these determine their expected longevity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Ameriks, J., Briggs, J., Caplin, A., Shapiro, M. D., & Tonetti, C. (2014, April). Resolving the annuity puzzle: Estimating life-cycle models without (and with) behavioural data (Working paper). New York University, 60 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquilina, M., Baker, R., & Majer, T. (2014, December). The value for money of annuities and other retirement income strategies in the UK, Financial Conduct Authority (Occasional paper no. 5), 95 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aro, H. (2014). Systematic and nonsystematic mortality risk in pension portfolios. North American Actuarial Journal, 18(1), 59–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A. J., Gokhale, J., Kotlikoff, L. J., Sabelhaus, J., & Weil, D. N. (2001). The annuitization of Americans’ resources: A Cohort analysis. In L. J. Kotlikoff (Ed.), Essays on saving, bequests, altruism and life-cycle planning (pp. 93–131). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aviva. (2014). Making good retirement choices – An investment special report. Aviva, 15 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateman, H., & Piggott, J. (2011). Too much risk to insure? The Australian (non) market for annuities. In O. S. Mitchell, J. Piggott, & N. Takayama (Eds.), Securing lifelong retirement income: Global annuity markets and policy (pp. 81–105). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., & Sutcliffe, C. M. S. (2010a). Valuing medieval annuities: Were corrodies underpriced? Explorations in Economic History, 47(2), 142–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, A., & Sutcliffe, C. M. S. (2010b). Annuities: Lessons from the past and concerns for the future. The Professional Investor, 19(4), 26–30. Winter 2009–2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim, B. D. (1991). How strong are bequest motives? Evidence based on estimates of the demand for life insurance and annuities. Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), 899–927.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beshears, J., Choi, J. J., Laibson, D., Madrian, B. C., & Zeldes, S. P. (2014). What makes annuitization more appealing? Journal of Public Economics, 116, 2–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuyan, V. (2011). Reverse mortgages and linked securities: The complete guide to risk, pricing and regulation. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R. (2001). Are the elderly really over-annuitized? New evidence on life insurance and bequests. In D. A. Wise (Ed.), Themes in the economics of aging (pp. 91–126). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R. (2008). Understanding the role of annuities in retirement planning. In A. Lusardi (Ed.), Overcoming the saving slump: How to increase the effectiveness of financial education and saving programs (pp. 178–206). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. L., & McDaid, J. (2003). Factors affecting retirement mortality. North American Actuarial Journal, 7(2), 24–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., & Poterba, J. M. (2000). Joint life annuities and annuity demand by married couples. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 67(4), 527–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. L., & Scahill, P. (2010, May). Issues in the issuance of enhanced annuities (SEDAP Research Paper no. 265). McMaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., & Warshawsky, M. J. (2004). Longevity insured retirement distributions from pension plans: Market and regulatory issues. In W. G. Gale, J. B. Shoven, & M. J. Warshawsky (Eds.), Private pensions and public policies (pp. 332–382). Washington, DC: Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J., & Warshawsky, M. (2013). The life care annuity: A new empirical examination of an insurance innovation that addresses problems in the markets for life annuities and long-term care insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 80(3), 677–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Casey, M. D., & Mitchell, O. S. (2007, December). Who values the social security annuity? New evidence on the annuity puzzle (Working paper NBER).

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Kling, J. R., Mullainathan, S., & Wrobel, M. V. (2008). Why don’t people insure late-life consumption? A framing explanation of the under-annuitization puzzle. American Economic Review, 98(2), 304–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Kling, J. R., Mullainathan, S., & Wrobel, M. V. (2009). Framing lifetime income. Journal of Retirement, 1(1), 27–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Kapteyn, A., Luttmer, E. F. P., & Mitchell, O. S. (2013). Complexity as a barrier to annuitization: Do consumers know how to value annuities? (Working paper). Pension Research Council, WP2013-01.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, C., Finke, M. S., & Huston, S. J. (2012). Rational choice with complex products: Consumer valuation of annuities. Journal of Financial Counselling and Planning, 23(2), 32–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummer, A. (2010). The great pensions robbery: How the politicians betrayed retirement. London: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burrows, B. (2013). Healthy choice?, The Actuary, 4th April, 2 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, E., & Tonks, I. (2005). Survey of annuity pricing (Department for Work and Pensions, Research Report no. 318).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, E., & Tonks, I. (2008). Annuity markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, E., & Tonks, I. (2014). The annuity puzzle: Cohort mortality risk or adverse selection in the annuity market? (Working paper), 54 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazalet Consulting. (2014). When I’m sixty-four. London: Cazalet Consulting.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charupat, N., Kamstra, M. J., & Milevsky, M. A. (forthcoming). The sluggish and asymmetric reaction of life annuity prices to changes in interest rates. Journal of Risk and Insurance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chigodaev, A., Milevsky, M. A., & Salisbury, T. S. (2014, January). How long does the market think you will live? Implying longevity from annuity prices (Discussion Paper). York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, G. L., & Knox-Hayes, J. (2007). Mapping UK pension benefits and the intended purchase of annuities in the aftermath of the 1990s stock market bubble. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 32(4), 539–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, J., Minney, A., & Sainsbury, P. (2012). How much super do Australians really have? Challenger Retirement Income Research, 16 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, S. H., & Lin, Y. (2007). Natural hedging of life and annuity mortality risks. North American Actuarial Journal, 11(3), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crawford, R., & Tetlow, G. (2012). Expectations and experience of retirement in defined contribution pensions: A study of older people in England. London: Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumbo, J. (2014). Australians dismiss fear of pensions profligacy, The Financial Times, 21st March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, T. (2009). Housing, health and annuities. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 76(1), 31–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidoff, T., Brown, J. R., & Diamond, P. A. (2005). Annuities and individual welfare. American Economic Review, 95(5), 1573–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for Work and Pensions. (2015a). Creating a secondary annuity market. Department for Work and Pensions, Cm 9046, March, 29 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiCenzo, J., Shu, S., Hadar, L., & Rieth, C. (2011). Can annuity purchase intentions be influenced? Society of Actuaries, 23 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, C. (2014). Quantifying mortality risk in small defined benefit pension schemes. Scandinavian Actuarial Journal, 2014(1), 41–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dushi, I., & Webb, A. (2006). Rethinking the sources of adverse selection in the annuity markets. In P.A. Chiappori, & C. Gollier (Ed.), Competitive failures in insurance markets: Theory and policy implications (pp. 185–212). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eley, J. (2014). New Totem for Thatcher’s ageing citizens. The Financial Times, 20th March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmerson, C., Keynes, S., & Tetlow, G. (2014). Characteristics of those directly affected by the 2014 budget pension reforms (IFS Briefing Note BN147). Institute for Fiscal Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, H., & Habermann, C. (2008). Welfare effects of life annuities: Some clarifications. Economics Letters, 99(1), 177–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feigenbaum, J., Gahramanov, E., & Tang, X. (2013). Is it really good to annuitise? Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization, 93, 116–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Financial Conduct Authority. (2014). Thematic review of annuities, financial conduct authority, TR14/2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, M., Howe, J. S., & Huston, S. (2014, August). Old age and the decline in financial literacy (Working paper). Texas Tech University, 40 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, A., & Poterba, J. (2002). Selection effects in the United Kingdom individual annuities market. Economic Journal, 112(476), 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, A., & Poterba, J. (2004). Adverse selection in insurance markets: Policyholder evidence from the UK annuity market. Journal of Political Economy, 112(1), 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkelstein, A., & Poterba, J. (2014). Testing for asymmetric information using “unused observables” in insurance markets: Evidence from the U.K. annuity market. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 81(4), 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, J. H. Y. (2015). Beyond age and sex: Enhancing annuity pricing. Geneva Risk and Insurance Review, 40(2), 133–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, J. H. Y., Lemaire, J., & Tse, Y. K. (2014). Improving money’s worth ratio calculations: The case of Singapore’s pension annuities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Risk and Insurance, 8(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frees, E. W., Carriere, J., & Valdez, E. (1996). Annuity valuation with dependent mortality. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 63(2), 229–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J., & Wadsworth, M. (2004). Who would buy and annuity? An empirical investigation. Watson Wyatt technical paper series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzale, R. S., & Walker, L. (2009, March). Behavioural biases in annuity choice: An experiment (Working paper). Williams College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzale, R., Mackenzie, S., & Walker, L. (2012). Do default and longevity annuities improve annuity take-up rates? Results from an experiment, Research Report, AARP Public Policy Institute, 22 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedde-Menke, M., Lehmensiek-Starke, M., & Nolte, S. (2014). An empirical test of competing hypothesis for the annuity puzzle. Journal of Economic Psychology, 43, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gong, G., & Webb, A. (2010). Evaluating the advanced life deferred annuity – An annuity people might actually buy. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 46(1), 210–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, D. (2013). Prospect theory, life insurance and annuities (Working paper). University of Pennsylvania, 52 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government Annuities Act 1929. (1929). HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillemette, M. A., Martin, T. K., Cummings, B. F., & James, R. N. (2016, January). Determinants of the stated probability of purchase for longevity insurance. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance, 41(1), 4–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardena, D., Hicks, C., & O’Neill, D. (2008). Pension annuities: Pension annuities and the open market option (ABI Research Paper no. 8). Association of British Insurers, 36 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haensly, P. J., & Pai, K. P. (2014). A new strategy to guarantee retirement income using TIPS and longevity insurance: A second look (Working paper). University of Texas of the Permian Basin, 38 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanewald, K., Post, T., & Sherris, M. (2016, June). Portfolio choice in retirement – What is the optimal home equity release product?, Journal of Risk and Insurance, 83(2), 421–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. (2012). Is failure imminent for the United Kingdom’s annuity market? Pensions: An International Journal, 17(2), 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D. (2013). Annuities and the annuitization process: The consumer perspective. A review of the literature and an overview of the market. Financial Services Consumer Panel, 26 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, D., & Blake, D. (2013). A healthier way to de-risk: The introduction of medical underwriting to the defined benefit de-risking market. London: The Pensions Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horneff, V., Kaschützke, B., Maurer, R., & Rogalla, R. (2014). Welfare implications of product choice regulation during the payout phase of funded pensions. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 13(3), 272–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, W. Y., & Scott, J. S. (2007). Behavioural obstacles in the annuity market. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(6), 71–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Longevity Centre-UK. (2015). Making the system fit for purpose: How consumer appetite for secure retirement income could be supported by the pension reforms. ILC-UK, 24 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2009). The formula that felled Wall Street. The Financial Times, 24 April 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keohane, N., Evans, K., & Richards, B. (2015). Golden years? What freedom and choice will mean for UK pensioners. Social Market Foundation, 95 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopf, E. W. (1927). The early history of the annuity. Proceedings of the Casualty Actuarial Society, 13(28), 225–266.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotlikoff, L. J., & Spivak, A. (1981). The family as an incomplete annuities market. Journal of Political Economy, 89(2), 372–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kutlu-Koc, V., & Kalwij, A. (2013). Individuals’ survival expectations and actual mortality (Netspar Discussion Paper, DP 05/2013-013), 41 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitner, J., Silverman, D., & Stolyarov, D. (2014, September). Annuitized wealth and post-retirement saving (Working paper). University of Michigan, 35 pages,

    Google Scholar 

  • Levantesi, S., & Menzietti, M. (2012). Managing longevity and disability risks in life annuities with long term care. Insurance: Mathematics and Economics, 50(3), 391–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, J. (2014). New annuity era – Understanding retirement choices and the annuity puzzle. Strategic Society Centre, 54 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowe, J. (2014). Whither UK annuities? Why lifetime annuities should still be part of good financial advice in the post-pension-liberalization world. International Longevity Centre-UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lown, J. M., & Robb, D. K. (2011). Attitudes toward immediate annuities: Overcoming the annuity puzzle. Journal of Consumer Education, 28, 44–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald, B. J., Jones, B., Morrison, R. J., Brown, R. L., & Hardy, M. (2013). Research and reality: A literature review on drawing down retirement financial savings. North American Actuarial Journal, 17(3), 181–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markwat, T., Molenaar, R., & Rodriguez, J. C. (2015, February). Purchasing an annuity: Now or later? The role of interest rates (Netspar design paper no. 36), 53 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayhew, L., Smith, D., & Wright, D. (2015). Pension pots and how to survive them. International Longevity Centre, November.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, D., & Mitchell, O. S. (2010). International adverse selection in life insurance and annuities. In S. Tuljapurkar, N. Ogawa, & A. H. Gauthier (Eds.), Ageing in advanced industrial states (pp. 119–135). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKeever, K. (2010). A short history of Tontines. Fordham Journal of Corporate and Financial Law, 15(2), 491–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • MGM Advantage. (2014). Long life, not according to the wife. MGM Advantage: Worthing, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky, M. A. (2005a). The implied longevity yield: A note on developing an index for life annuities. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72(2), 301–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky, M. A. (2005b). Real longevity insurance with a deductible: Introduction to Advanced Life Delayed Annuities (ALDA). North American Actuarial Journal, 9(4), 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky, M. A. (2012). The 7 most important equations for your retirement. Mississauga: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky, M. A. (2013). Life annuities: An optimal product for retirement income. Charlottesville: Research Foundation of the CFA Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milevsky, M. A. (2015). King William’s Tontine: Why the retirement annuity of the future should resemble its past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, O. S., & Piggott, J. (2011). Turning wealth into lifetime income: Global annuity markets and policy. In O. S. Mitchell, J. Piggott, & N. Takayama (Eds.), Securing lifelong retirement income: Global annuity markets and policy (pp. 1–12). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, O. S., Poterba, J. M., Warshawsky, M. J., & Brown, J. R. (1999). New evidence on the money’s worth of individual annuities. American Economic Review, 89(5), 1299–1318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Modigliani, F. (1986). Life cycle, individual thrift and the wealth of nations. American Economic Review, 76(3), 297–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. F., & Mitchell, O. S. (1997). Projected retirement wealth and savings adequacy in the health and retirement study (Working paper 6240). National Bureau of Economic Research, 41 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtaugh, C. M., Spillman, B. C., & Warshawsky, M. J. (2001). In sickness and in health: An annuity approach to financing long-term care and retirement income. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 68(2), 225–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAPF. (2015). 82% positive about pension freedoms but many worried about risks. National Association of Pension Funds, April.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuberger, A., & McCarthy, D. (2003). Pensions policy: Evidence on aspects of savings behaviour and capital markets. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newfield, P. (2014). The Tontine: An improvement on the conventional annuity? Journal of Retirement, 1(3), 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosi, C., D’Agostino, A., & Pagliuca, M. M. (2014). Saving for old age: Longevity annuity buying intention of Italian young adults. Journal of Behavioural and Experimental Economics, 51, 85–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panis, C. W. A. (2004). Annuities and retirement well-being. In O. S. Mitchell & S. P. Utkus (Eds.), Pension design and structure: New lessons from behavioural finance (pp. 259–274). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2013). Defining ambitions – Shaping pension reform around public attitudes. Institute for Public Policy Research, December, 52 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partnership. (2013). Almost 80% of people don’t realise they could lose out by staying with their existing pension provider says partnership. Press release, August 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, J. W., Sagara, N., Shu, S. B., Appelt, K. C., & Johnson, E. J. (2013). Life expectancy as a constructed belief: Evidence of a live-to or die-by framing effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 46, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peracchi, F., & Perotti, V. (2009). Subjective survival probabilities and life tables: An empirical analysis of Cohort effects. Genus: Journal of Population Studies, 65(1), 23–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peracchi, F., & Perotti, V. (2012). Subjective survival probabilities and life tables: Evidence from Europe (Working Paper). Einaudi Institute for Economics and Finance, 27 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piggott, J., Valdez, E. A., & Detzel, B. (2005). The simple analytics of a pooled annuity fund. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 72(3), 497–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pla-Porcel, J., Ventura-Marco, M., & Vidal-Melia, C. (2014). Integrating retirement and long-term care (LTC) annuities using a notional defined contribution (NDC) framework (Working paper). University of Valencia, 45 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Previtero, A. (2014). Stock market returns and annuitization. Journal of Financial Economics, 113(2), 202–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PwC. (2014). UK annuities market could decline by up to 75% as consumers look to alternative retirement products. Price Waterhouse Coopers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, S. (2008) Postcode Ratings for Mortality, Momentum Convention, Berlin, 22 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickayzen, B. (2007). An analysis of disability-linked annuities (Actuarial Research Paper no. 10). Cass Business School, 43 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotemberg, J., & Gourville, J. T. (2010). New York life and immediate annuities. Harvard Business School, Case 9-510-040.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaus, S. L. (2005). Annuities make a comeback. Journal of Pension Benefits, 12(4), 34–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreiber, P., & Weber, M. (2013). Time inconsistent preferences and the annuitization decision (Working paper). University of Mannheim, 56 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shankar, S. G. (2009). A new strategy to guarantee retirement income using TIPS and longevity insurance. Financial Services Review, 18(1), 53–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shu, S. B. (2013). Psychological aspects of decumulation decisions: The case of Tontine insurance (Working paper). UCLA. 16 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silcock, D. (2011). What are the restrictions of the UK government’s policy to remove the effective requirement to annuitise private pension funds by the age of 75? Pensions: An International Journal, 16(4), 277–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spillman, B. C., Murtaugh, C. M., & Warshawsky, M. J. (2003). Policy implications of an annuity approach to integrating long-term care financing and retirement income. Journal of Aging and Health, 15(1), 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffen, B. (2009). Formation and updating of subjective life expectancy: Evidence from Germany. MEA Studies 08, May, 144 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R. (2009). Annuity decisions with systematic longevity risk (Working paper). Tilburg University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, M. (2004). Understanding pensions. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, C. M. S. (2010a). Back to the future: A long term solution to the occupational pensions crisis. Insurance Markets and Companies: Analyses and Actuarial Computations, 1(2), 11–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, C. M. S. (2010b). Should defined benefit pension schemes be career average or final salary? In M. Bertocchi, S. Schwartz, & W. Ziemba (Eds.), Optimizing the ageing, retirement and pensions dilemma (pp. 227–257). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutcliffe, C.M.S. (2015) Trading Death: The Implications of Annuity Replication for the Annuity Puzzle, Arbitrage, Speculation and Portfolios, International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 38, no. March, pp. 163–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury (2014). Freedom and Choice in Pensions: Government Response to the Consultation, HM Treasury, July, Cm 8901.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury. (2015a). Creating a secondary annuity market. HM Treasury, Cm 9046, March, 28 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treasury. (2015b). Creating a secondary annuity market, response to the call for evidence. HM Treasury, December, 36 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. (2014). Why don’t people annuitize? The role of advice provided by retirement planning software. Journal of Retirement, 1(4), 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaz, T. A., Machado, S. J., & Bortoluzzo, A. B. (2012). Demand for life annuities: A Brazilian perspective. Brazilian Administration Review, 9(4), 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velde, F. R., & Weir, D. R. (1992). The financial market and government debt policy in France, 1746–1793. Journal of Economic History, 52(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vidal-Meliá, C., & Lejárraga-García, A. (2006). Demand for life annuities from married couples with a bequest motive. Journal of Pension Economics and Finance, 5(2), 197–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walliser, J. (2000). Adverse selection in the annuities market and the impact of privatizing social security. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 102(3), 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., Rieger, M. O., & Hens, T. (2016 February). How time preferences differ: Evidence from 53 countries. Journal of Economic Psychology, 52, 115–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warshawsky, M. J., Spillman, B. C., & Murtaugh, C. M. (2002). Integrating life annuities and long-term care insurance: Theory, evidence, practice and policy. In O. S. Mitchell, Z. Bodie, P. B. Hammond, & S. Zeldes (Eds.), Innovations in retirement financing (pp. 198–221). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, D. C. (2009). Asymmetric information, long-term care insurance and annuities: The case for bundled contracts. Journal of Risk and Insurance, 76(1), 53–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells, J. (2014). Pension annuities: A review of consumer behaviour. Financial Conduct Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willets, R. (2015). The importance of longevity in financial planning, partnership, March. 33 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, S., Stevens, R., & Thorp, S. (2014). Die young or live long: Modelling subjective survival probabilities (Working paper). University of New South Wales, 43 pages.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yaari, M. (1965). Uncertain lifetime, life insurance and the theory of the consumer. Review of Economic Studies, 32(2), 137–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, N., & Bauer, D. (2014). A cautionary note on natural hedging of longevity risk. North American Actuarial Journal, 18(1), 104–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sutcliffe, C. (2016). Annuities. In: Finance and Occupational Pensions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94863-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94863-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-349-94862-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-349-94863-5

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics