Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Animals as Signifiers: Re-Reading Michel Foucault’s The Order of Things as a Genealogical Working Tool for Historical Human–Animal Studies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beyond the Human-Animal Divide

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 747 Accesses

Abstract

Michel Foucault’s work has lately been discovered for animal studies, yet it is hardly ever used as a tool for animal history. By making use of central concepts—such as heterotopia and heterochrony—this paper highlights the epistemic value of the ordering concepts for animal historians introduced in his early oeuvre. Genealogical readings of the creatures that encroach on his writing in The Order of Things especially provide historians with a framework for looking at animal symbolism and animal taxonomies. It helps them to identify the ordering of animals as historically contingent. Moreover, by a careful appraisal of the text, the textual agency of animals can be identified in Foucault’s way of thinking supporting the claim that the usage of animals as symbols is not so arbitrary as might seem at first glance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Ahuja, Neel. 2009. “Postcolonial Critique in a Multispecies World.” PMLA, 124 (2): 556–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, Philip. 2002. “The Postcolonial Animal.” Society and Animals 10 (4): 413–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. What Animals Mean in the Fiction of Modernity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Steve. 1993. Picturing the Beast. Animals, Identity and Representation. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Sven et al. (eds). 2015. Das Handeln der Tiere. Tierliche Agency im Fokus der Human-Animal Studies. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennison, Rod. 2011. “An Inclusive Re-Engagement with our Nonhuman Animal Kin: Considering Human Interrelationships with Nonhuman Animals.” Animals 1 (1): 40–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, John. 1980. “Why Look at Animals?” In About Looking. New York: Pantheon, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgards, Roland. 2007. “Wolf, Mensch, Hund: Theriotopologien in Brehms Tierleben und Storms Aquis Submersus.” In Politische Zoologie, edited by Anne von der Heyden and Joseph Vogl, 131–147. Zürich: Diaphanes.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “Tiere in der Literatur: Eine methodische Standortbestimmung.” In Das Tier an sich: Disziplinenübergreifende Perspektiven für neue Wege im wissenschaftsbasierten Tierschutz, edited by Carola Otterstedt and Herwig Grimm, 87–118. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkfelt, Sune. 2011. “Non-Human Otherness: Animals as Others and Devices for Othering.” In Otherness: A Multilateral Perspective, edited by Susan Yi Sencindiver, Maria Beville, Marie Lauritzen, 137–154. Frankfurt a. M.: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, Jorge Luis. 1999. “John Wilkins’ Analytical Language.” In Selected Nonfictions, edited by Eliot Weinberger, 229–232. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosteels, Bruno. 2003. “Nonplaces: An Anecdoted Topography of Contemporary French Theory.” Diacritics 33 (3–4): 117–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, Rosi. 2009. “Animals, Anomalies, and Inorganic Others.” PMLA 124 (2): 526–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchner-Fuhs, Jutta. 1996. Kultur mit Tieren: Zur Formierung des bürgerlichen Tierverständnisses im 19. Jahrhundert. Münster: Waxmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulliet, Richard W. 2005. Hunters, Herders, and Hamburgers: The Past and Future of Human-Animal Relations. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, Bob, and Nickie Charles. 2013. “Animals, Agency and Resistance.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 43: 322–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Esther. 1994. “Animals in Medieval Perceptions: The Image of the Ubiquitous Other.” In Animals and Human Society: Changing Perspectives, edited by Aubrey Manning and James Serpell, 59–80. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deckha, Maneesha. 2012. “Toward a Postcolonial, Posthumanist Feminist Theory: Centralizing Race and Culture in Feminist Work on Nonhuman Animals.” Hypatia 27 (3): 527–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Despret, Vinciane. 2013. “From Secret Agents to Interagency.” History and Theory 52 (4): 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Mary. 1990. “The Pangolin Revisited: A New Approach to Animal Symbolism.” In Signifying Animals: Human Meaning in the Natural World, edited by Roy Willis, 25–36. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanon, Frantz. 2004 [1963]. The Wretched of the Earth. Trans. by Richard Philcox. New York: Grove Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans-Pritchard, Edward. 1940. The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of A Nilotic People, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1980. “The Confession of the Flesh.” In Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977, edited by Colin Gordon. Translated by Colin Gordon, Leo Marshall, John Mepham, Kate Soper, 194–228. New York: Pantheon.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. “Of Other Spaces.” Diacritics 16: 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frietsch, Ute. 2008. “Die Ordnung der Dinge.” In Foucault-Handbuch: Leben, Werk, Wirkung, edited by Elke Reinhardt-Becker and Clemens Kammler, 38–50. Stuttgart: Metzler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, Erica. 2002. “A Left-Handed Blow: Writing the History of Animals.” In Representing Animals, edited by Nigel Rothfels, 3–18. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. 1989. Primate Visions: Gender, Race, and Nature in the World of Modern Science. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1997. Modest Witness@Second Millennium.FemaleMan Meets OncoMouse(TM): Feminism and Technoscience. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2008. When Species Meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoorenman, Johanna. 2010. “Writing ‘that Animal Darkness’: Galway Kinnell, Gary Snyder, James Merrill.” PhD diss., Trinity College Dublin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hribal, Jason C. 2007. “Animals, Agency, and Class: Writing the History of Animals from Below.” Human Ecology Review 14 (1): 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Fear of the Animal Planet: The Hidden History of Animal Resistance. Oakland: AK Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hüppauf, Bernd. 2011. Vom Frosch: Eine Kulturgeschichte zwischen Tierphilosophie und Ökologie. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huggan, Graham, and Helen Tiffin. 2010. Postcolonial Ecocriticism: Literature, Animals, Environment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kean, Hilda. 2012. “Challenges for Historians Writing Animal-Human History: What is Really Enough?” Anthrozöos 25: 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirksey, S. Eben, and Stefan Helmreich. 2010. “The Emergence of Multispecies Ethnography.” Cultural Anthropology 25 (4): 545–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1964. Totemism. Trans. Rodney Needham London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, Susan. 2009. “Literary Animal Agents.” PMLA 124 (2): 487–496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, John. 2015. “Zooheterotopias.” In The Globalization of Space: Foucault and Heterotopia, edited by John Miller and Mariangela Palladino, 149–164. London: Pickering & Chatto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Livingston, Julie, and Jasbir K. Puar. 2011. “Interspecies.” Social Text 29 (1): 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novek, Joel. 2012. “Discipline and Distancing: Confined Pigs in the Factory Farm Gulag.” In Animals and the Human Imagination: A Companion to Animal Studies, edited by Aaron Gross and Anne Vallely, 121–151. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, Clare. 2001. “‘Taming the Wild Profusion of Existing Things’? A Study of Foucault, Power, and Human/Animal Relationships.” Environmental Ethics 23 (4): 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. “Madness and Animality in Foucault’s Madness and Civilization.” In Animal Philosophy: Essential Readings in Continental Thought, edited by Peter Atterton and Matthew Calarco, 72–84. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pandian, Anand. 2012. “Pastoral Power in the Postcolony: On the Biopolitics of the Criminal Animal in South India.” In Animals and the Human Imagination: A Companion to Animal Studies, edited by Aaron Gross and Anne Vallely, 79–112. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton, Paul. 2003. “Language, Power, and the Training of Horses.” In Zoontologies: The Question of the Animal, edited by Cary Wolfe, 83–100. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, Susan J., and Mary Weismantel. 2010. “Does the ‘Animal’ Exist? Toward a Theory of Social Life with Animals.” In Beastly Natures: Animals, Humans, and the Study of History, edited by Dorothee Brantz, 17–37. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philo, Chris, and Chris Wilbert. 2000. Animal Spaces, Beastly Places: New Geographies of Human-Animal Relations. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rinfret, Sara. 2009. “Controlling Animals: Power, Foucault, and Species Management.” Society & Natural Resources 22 (6): 571–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roscher, Mieke. 2015. “Geschichtswissenschaften. Von einer Geschichte mit Tieren zu einer Tiergeschichte.” In Disziplinierte Tiere? Perspektiven der Human-Animal Studies für die wissenschaftlichen Disziplinen, edited by Reingard Spannring et al., 75–100. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarasin, Philipp. 2009. Darwin und Foucault, Genealogie und Geschichte im Zeitalter der Biologie. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sax, Boria. 2013. Imaginary Animals: The Monstrous, the Wondrous and the Human. London: Reaktion Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, David Gary. 2013. “A Way with Animals.” History and Theory 52: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tester, Keith. 1991. Animals and Society: The Humanity of Animal Rights. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thierman, Stephen. 2010. “Apparatuses of Animality: Foucault Goes to a Slaughterhouse.” Foucault Studies 9: 89–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Topinka, Robert J. 2010. “Foucault, Borges, Heterotopia: Producing Knowledge in Other Spaces.” Foucault Studies 9: 54–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wadiwel, Dinesh Joseph. 2002. “Cows and Sovereignty: Biopower and Animal Life.” Borderlands E-Journal 1 (2). http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol1no2_2002/wadiwel_cows.html.

  • Walker, Brett. 2013. “Animals and the Intimacy of History.” History and Theory 52: 45–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiedenmann, Rainer E. 2002. Die Tiere der Gesellschaft: Studien zur Soziologie und Semantik von Mensch-Tier-Beziehungen. Konstanz: UVK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willis, Roy. 1990. “Introduction.” In Signifying Animals: Human Meaning in the Natural World, edited by Roy Willis, 1–24. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wirth, Sven. 2011. “Fragmente einer anthropozentrisch-kritischen Herrschaftskritik.” In Human-Animal Studies: Über die gesellschaftliche Natur von Mensch-Tier-Verhältnissen, edited by Chimaira – Arbeitskreis für Human-Animal Studies, 43–84. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany

    Mieke Roscher

Authors
  1. Mieke Roscher
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of History, University of Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Dominik Ohrem

  2. Faculty of Philosophy, University of Cologne, Cologne, Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany

    Roman Bartosch

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roscher, M. (2017). Animals as Signifiers: Re-Reading Michel Foucault’s The Order of Things as a Genealogical Working Tool for Historical Human–Animal Studies. In: Ohrem, D., Bartosch, R. (eds) Beyond the Human-Animal Divide. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation