Skip to main content

Animating Creaturely Life

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beyond the Human-Animal Divide

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature ((PSAAL))

  • 740 Accesses

Abstract

Animating life—What’s the deal with this particularly blatant tautology? Life, creaturely or otherwise, would not be life if it weren’t already animate; animacy is the defining characteristic of life. As we learn from the Oxford English Dictionary, the term “animacy” can refer to a) the general “quality or condition of being alive or animate” or b), of its use in linguistics , to the “fact or quality of denoting a living thing” and the “classification or ranking of words or their referents on this basis” (Animacy 2016).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • “Animacy, N.” 2016. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford University Press. http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/248721.

  • Benjamin, Walter. 2002. “The Storyteller: Observations on the Works of Nikolai Leskov (1936).” In Selected Writings, edited by Howard Eiland and Michael W. Jennings, 3, 1935–1938:143–166. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of War: When Is Life Grievable? London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. “On This Occasion …” In Butler on Whitehead: On the Occasion, edited by Roland Faber, Michael Halewood, and Deena Lin, 3–17. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calarco, Matthew. 2008. Zoographies: The Question of the Animal from Heidegger to Derrida. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Mel Y. 2012. Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, Gilles, and Félix Guattari. 1994. What Is Philosophy? Translated by Hugh Tomlinson and Graham Burchell. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, Jacques. 2008. The Animal That Therefore I Am. Edited by Marie-Luise Mallet. Translated by David Wills. New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dooren, Thom van, and Deborah Bird Rose. 2012. “Storied Places in a Multispecies City.” Humanimalia 3 (2): 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. “Lively Ethography: Storying Animist Worlds.” Environmental Humanities 8 (1): 77–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J. 2003. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna J., and Cary Wolfe. 2016. “Companions in Conversation.” In Manifestly Haraway, by Donna J. Haraway, 201–296. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman, David, ed. 2015. Creatural Fictions: Human-Animal Relationships in Twentieth and Twenty-First Century Literature. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingold, Tim. 2006. “Rethinking the Animate, Re-Animating Thought.” Ethnos 71 (1): 9–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, Susan. 2011. Animal Stories: Narrating Across Species Lines. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Michaelsen, Scott. 1999. The Limits of Multiculturalism: Interrogating the Origins of American Anthropology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohrem, Dominik, and Matthew Calarco, eds. Re-Encountering Animals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pettman, Dominic. 2017. Creaturely Love: How Desire Makes Us More and Less Than Human. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pick, Anat. 2011. Creaturely Poetics: Animality and Vulnerability in Literature and Film. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Redmalm, David. 2015. “Pet Grief: When Is Non-Human Life Grievable?” The Sociological Review 63 (1): 19–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, Joshua. 2016. “Animal Narrativity: Engaging with Story in a More-Than-Human World.” In Animal Subjects 2.0, edited by Carla Jodey Castricano, Lauren Corman, and Rod Preece, 145–173. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santner, Eric L. 2006. On Creaturely Life: Rilke, Benjamin, Sebald. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stanescu, James. 2012. “Species Trouble: Judith Butler, Mourning, and the Precarious Lives of Animals.” Hypatia 27 (3): 567–582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stengers, Isabelle. 2011. Cosmopolitics II. Trans. Robert Bononno. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, Chloë. 2008. “The Precarious Lives of Animals: Butler, Coetzee, and Animal Ethics.” Philosophy Today 52 (1): 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thoreau, Henry David. 2009. The Journal, 1837–1861. Edited by Damion Searls. New York: New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhall, Michael. 2016. “Creaturely Conditions: Acknowledgment and Animality in Kafka, Cavell, and Uexküll.” Configurations 24 (1): 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vance, Linda. 1995. “Beyond Just-So Stories: Narrative, Animals, and Ethics.” In Animals and Women: Feminist Theoretical Explorations, edited by Carol J. Adams and Josephine Donovan, 163–191. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen, Pieter, and Virginia Richter. 2015. “Introduction: Creaturely Constellations.” European Journal of English Studies 19 (1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weheliye, Alexander G. 2014. Habeas Viscus: Racializing Assemblages, Biopolitics, and Black Feminist Theories of the Human. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, Edward O. 1984. Biophilia. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ohrem, D. (2017). Animating Creaturely Life. In: Ohrem, D., Bartosch, R. (eds) Beyond the Human-Animal Divide. Palgrave Studies in Animals and Literature. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-93437-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics