Abstract
In this chapter we examine the use of verbal –s in existential there sentences; that is, the use of –s in the context of a plural denotational subject (e.g. There is/was/There’s birds in the garden). Following Breivik and Swan’s (Words: Structure, meaning, function: A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 19–34, 2000) analysis that existential there has grammaticalised from locative there, we will (on the model of Hopper and Traugott in Grammaticalization, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2nd ed., 2003) suggest that existential there has undergone secondary grammaticalisation and merged with verbal –s into a single morpheme there’s (Traugott in Studies in the history of the English language. Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 19–49, 2002). While many researchers have previously argued that there’s has the status of a kind of presentative device that signals the introduction of new information (e.g. Breivik in Language, 57, 1–25, 1981), we will, exploiting an insight from Walker (English World-Wide, 28, 147–166, 2007), provide empirical evidence from constraint hierarchies that there’s may even have iconically grammaticalised further into the sign theres.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abney, S. P. (1987). The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Adger, D., & Smith, J. (2005). Variation and the minimalist program. In L. Cornips & K. Corrigan (Eds.), Syntax and variation: Reconciling the biological and the social (pp. 149–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L., & Stavrou, M. (2007). Noun phrase in the generative perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Andersen, H. (2006). Grammation, regrammation and degrammation: Tense loss in Russian. Diachronica, 23, 231–258.
Antieau, L. (2011). Was/were variation in the Middle Rocky Mountains. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics, 32, 48–66.
Askedal, J. O. (2008). ‘Degrammaticalization’ versus typology: Reflections on a strained relationship. In T. Eythórsson (Ed.), Grammatical change and linguistic theory: The Rosendal papers (pp. 45–77). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Belletti, A. (1988). The case of unaccusatives. Linguistic Inquiry, 19, 1–34.
Bernstein, J. (2001). The DP hypothesis: Identifying clausal properties in the nominal domain. In C. Collins & M. Baltin (Eds.), Handbook of contemporary syntactic theory (pp. 536–561). Oxford: Blackwell.
Birner, B. J., & Ward, G. (1998). Information status and noncanonical word order in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bolinger, D. (1977). Meaning and form. London: Longman.
Breban, T. (2010). English adjectives of comparison: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Breban, T. (2015). Refining secondary grammaticalization by looking at subprocesses of change. Language Sciences, 47, 161–171.
Breivik, L. E. (1981). On the interpretation of existential there. Language, 57, 1–25.
Breivik, L. E., & Martínez-Insua, A. E. (2008). Grammaticalization, subjectification and non-concord in English existential sentences. English Studies, 89, 351–362.
Breivik, L. E., & Swan, T. (2000). The desemanticisation of existential there in a synchronic-diachronic perspective. In C. Dalton-Puffer & N. Ritt (Eds.), Words: Structure, meaning, function: A Festschrift for Dieter Kastovsky (pp. 19–34). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Brinton, L., & Stein, D. (1995). Functional renewal. In H. Andersen (Ed.), Historical linguistics 1993: Selected Papers from the 11th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Los Angeles, 16–20 August 1993 (pp. 33–47). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Britain, D. (2002). Diffusion, levelling, simplification and reallocation in past tense BE in the English Fens. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 6, 16–43.
Britain, D., & Sudbury, A. (2002). There’s sheep and there’s penguins: ‘Drift’, ‘slant’ and singular verb forms following existentials in New Zealand and Falkland Island English. In M. Jones & E. Esch (Eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors (pp. 209–242). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Bruening, B., Dinh, X., & Kim, L. (2015). Selection, idioms, and the structure of nominal phrases with and without classifiers. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 3, 42.
Bybee, J. (1995). Regular morphology and the lexicon. Language and Cognitive Processes, 10, 425–455.
Carlson, G. N. (1980). Reference to kinds in English. New York: Garland Publishing.
Chambers, J. (2004). Dynamic typology and vernacular universals. In B. Kortmann (Ed.), Dialectology meets typology: Dialect grammar from a cross-linguistic perspective (pp. 128–145). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Cheshire, J. (1999). Spoken Standard English. In T. Bex & R. Watts (Eds.), Standard English: The widening debate (pp. 149–166). London: Routledge.
Cheshire, J., & Fox, S. (2009). Was/were variation: A perspective from London. Language Variation and Change, 21, 1–38.
Cheshire, J., Edwards, V., & Whittle, P. (1989). Urban British dialect grammar: The question of dialect levelling. English World-Wide, 10, 185–225.
Chomsky, N. (1986). Barriers. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Chomsky, N. (1998). Minimalist inquiries: The framework. Cambridge, MA: MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics, 15.
Cinque, G. (1994). On the evidence for partial N-movement in the Romance DP. In G. Cinque, J. Koster, J.-Y. Pollock, L. Rizzi, & R. Zanuttini (Eds.), Paths towards universal grammar: Studies in honor of Richard S. Kayne (pp. 85–110). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Collins, P. (2012). Singular agreement in there-existentials: An intervarietal corpus-based study. English World-Wide, 33, 53–68.
Crawford, W. J. (2005). Verb agreement and disagreement: A corpus investigation of concord variation in existential There + Be constructions. Journal of English Linguistics, 33, 35–61.
De Vos, M. (2013). Homogeneity in subject-verb concord in South African English. Language Matters: Studies in the Languages of Africa, 44, 58–77.
Den Dikken, M., Bernstein, J., Tortora, C., & Zanuttini, R. (2007). Data and grammar: Means and individuals. Theoretical Linguistics, 33, 335–352.
Detges, U., & Waltereit, R. (2002). Grammaticalization vs. reanalysis: A semantic-pragmatic account of functional change in grammar. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft, 21, 151–195.
Diesing, M. (1992). Indefinites. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Durham, M. (2013). Was/were alternation in Shetland English. World Englishes, 32, 108–128.
Eisikovits, E. (1991). Variation in subject-verb agreement in inner Sydney English. In J. Cheshire (Ed.), English around the world: Sociolinguistic perspectives (pp. 235–256). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Feagin, C. (1979). Variation and change in Alabama English: A sociolinguistic study of the white community. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Felser, C., & Rupp, L. (2001). Expletives as arguments: Germanic existential sentences revisited. Linguistische Berichte, 187, 289–324.
Fischer, O. (1999). On the role played by iconicity in grammaticalization processes. In O. Fischer & M. Nänny (Eds.), Form miming meaning: Iconicity in language and literature (pp. 345–374). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Fischer, O. (2010). An iconic, analogical approach to grammaticalization. In C. Jac Conradie, R. Johl, M. Beukes, O. Fischer, & C. Ljungberg (Eds.), Signergy (pp. 279–299). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Givón, T. (1991). The evolution of dependent clause morpho-syntax in Biblical Hebrew. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 2): Focus on types of grammatical markers (pp. 257–310). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Grimshaw, J. (1991). Extended projection (Unpublished manuscript). Brandeis University, Waltham, MA.
Grzegorek, M. (1984). Thematization in English and Polish: A study in word order. Poznan: UAM.
Haiman, J. (1980). The iconicity of grammar: Isomorphism and motivation. Language, 56, 515–540.
Halliday, M. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar. London: E. J. Arnold.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.
Hankamer, J., & Mikkelsen, L. (2002). A morphological analysis of definite nouns in Danish. Journal of Germanic Linguistics, 14, 137–175.
Hannay, M. (1985). English existentials in functional grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
Harris, A. C., & Campbell, L. (1995). Historical syntax in cross-linguistic perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hay, J., & Schreier, D. (2004). Reversing the trajectory of language change: Subject-verb agreement with be in New Zealand. Language Variation and Change, 16, 209–235.
Heim, I. (1982). The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases (Doctoral dissertation). University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.
Henry, A. (1995). Belfast English and Standard English: Dialect variation and parameter setting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herring, S. C. (1991). The grammaticalization of rhetorical questions in Tamil. In E. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. 1) Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 253–284). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hilton, K. (2016). Nonstandard agreement in Standard English: The social perception of agreement variation under existential there. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, 22, 61–70.
Hopper, P. J. (1991). On some principles of grammaticization. In E. C. Traugott & B. Heine (Eds.), Approaches to grammaticalization (Vol. I): Theoretical and methodological issues (pp. 17–36). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Huddleston, R., & Pullum, G. K. (2002). The Cambridge grammar of the English language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Janda, R. D. (2001). Beyond “pathways” and “unidirectionality”: On the discontinuity of transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. Language Sciences, 23, 265–340.
Jang, Y. (1997). Minimal feature-movement. Journal of Linguistics, 33, 311–325.
Jenkins, L. (1975). The English existential. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.
Jenset, G. B. (2010). A corpus based study on the evolution of there: Statistical analysis and cognitive interpretation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Bergen, Bergen.
Jespersen, O. (1924). The philosophy of grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Jespersen, O. (1969). Analytic syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Joseph, B. D. (2004). Rescuing traditional (historical) linguistics from grammaticalization ‘theory’. In O. Fischer, M. Norde, & H. Peridon (Eds.), Up and down the cline (pp. 44–71). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Jucker, A. H. (1997). The discourse marker well in the history of English. English Language and Linguistics, 1, 91–110.
Koopman, H., & Sportiche, D. (1991). The position of subjects. Lingua, 85, 211–258.
Kranich, S. (2008). Subjective progressives in seventeenth and eighteenth century English: Secondary grammaticalization as a process of objectification. In M. Gotti, M. Dossena, & R. Dury (Eds.), English historical linguistics 2006 (Vol. I): Syntax and morphology (pp. 241–256). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kranich, S. (2010). Grammaticalization, subjectification and objectification. In K. Stathi, E. Gehweiler, & E. König (Eds.), Grammaticalization: Current views and issues (pp. 101–122). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Kratzer, A. (1995). Stage-level and individual-level predicates. In G. N. Carlson & F. J. Pelletier (Eds.), The generic book (pp. 125–175). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Krejci, B., & Hilton, K. (2015). Agreement variation under existential there. Paper presented at the Annual Corpus Lunch, Stanford University, Stanford.
Kuryłowicz, J. (1976). Esquisses linguistiques (Vol. 2, pp. 38–54). Munich: Fink [Original work published in Kuryłowicz, J. (1965). The Evolution of Grammatical Categories. Diogenes, 13, 55–71.]
Lange, C. (2012). The syntax of Indian English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Longobardi, G. (1994). Reference and proper names. Linguistic Inquiry, 25, 609–665.
Lyons, J. (1975). Deixis as the source of reference. In E. L. Keenan (Ed.), Formal semantics of natural language (pp. 61–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyons, C. (1999). Definiteness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martínez-Insua, A. E. (2004). Existential there-constructions in contemporary British English: A corpus driven analysis of their use in speech and writing. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Martínez-Insua, A. E. (2013). There-constructions as a choice for coherence in the recent history of English. In L. Fontaine, T. Bartlett, & G. O’Grady (Eds.), Systemic functional linguistics: Exploring choice (pp. 207–225). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Martínez-Insua, A. E., & Palacios Martínez, I. (2003). A corpus-based approach to non-concord in present-day English existential there-constructions. English Studies, 84, 262–283.
McMahon, A. M. S. (1994). Understanding language change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Meechan, M., & Foley, M. (1994). On resolving disagreement: Linguistic theory and variation—There’s bridges. Language Variation and Change, 6, 63–85.
Meillet, A. (1912). L’évolution des formes grammaticales. Scientia (Rivista di Scienza) 12, No. 26, 6. In Linguistique historique et linguistique générale (pp. 130–148). Paris: Librairie Ancienne Honoré Champion.
Melchers, G. (2004). English spoken in Orkney and Shetland: Morphology, syntax and lexicon. In B. Kortmann & E. W. Schneider (with K. Burridge, R. Mesthrie & C. Upton) (Eds.), A handbook of varieties of English (Vol. 2): Morphology and syntax (pp. 34–47). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Melchers, G., & Sundkvist, P. (2010). Shetland and Orkney. In D. Schreier, P. Trudgill, E. W. Schneider, & J. P. Williams (Eds.), The lesser-known varieties of English (pp. 17–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Milroy, J., & Milroy, L. (1985). Linguistic change social network and speaker innovation. Journal of Linguistics, 21, 339–384.
Milsark, G. (1974). Existential sentences in English (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Milsark, G. (1977). Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3, 1–29.
Montgomery, M., & Hall, J. (2004). Dictionary of Smoky Mountain English. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Moore, E. (2011). Interaction between social category and social practice: Explaining was/were variation. Language Variation and Change, 22, 347–371.
Narrog, H. (2012). Textual uses of modality and mood in subordinate clauses as part of speech-act orientation. In L. Brems, L. Ghesquière, & F. Van de Velde (Eds.), Intersections of intersubjectivity (pp. 29–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Narrog, H. (2015). (Inter)subjectification and its limits in secondary grammaticalization. Language Sciences, 47, 148–160.
Orton, H., & Dieth, E. (1962–1971). Survey of English Dialects. Leeds: E. J. Arnold.
Peitsara, K. (1988). On existential sentences in the dialect of Suffolk. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen, 1, 72–99.
Pérez-Guerra, J. (1999). Historical English syntax: A statistical corpus-based study on the organisation of Early Modern English sentences. München: Lincom.
Petyt, K. M. (1985). Dialect and accent in industrial West Yorkshire. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Pfenninger, S. E. (2009). Grammaticalization paths of English and high German existential constructions. Bern: Peter Lang.
Pietsch, L. (2005). “Some do and some doesn’t”: Verbal concord variation in the north of the British Isles. In B. Kortmann, T. Herrman, L. Pietsch, & S. Wagner (Eds.), A comparative grammar of British English dialects: Agreement, gender, relative clauses (pp. 125–210). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Pollock, J.-Y. (1989). Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.
Poplack, S., & Tagliamonte, S. (2001). African American English in the diaspora: Tense and aspect. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Prince, E. F. (1992). The ZPG letter: Subjects, definiteness and information-status. In W. C. Mann & S. A. Thompson (Eds.), Discourse description: Diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text (pp. 295–326). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Quirk, R., Greenbaum, S., Leech, G., & Svartvik, J. (1985). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
Ramat, A. G. (1995). Iconicity in grammaticalization processes. In R. Simone (Ed.), Iconicity in language (pp. 119–139). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ramchand, G. (1996). Two subject positions in Scottish Gaelic: The syntax-semantics interface. Natural Language Semantics, 4, 165–191.
Richards, H. (2010). Preterite be: A new perspective? English World-Wide, 31, 62–81.
Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Rosen, A. (2014). Grammatical variation and change in Jersey English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Ross, J. R. (1967). Constraints on variables in syntax (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Rupp, L. (2003). The syntax of imperatives in English and Germanic: Word order variation in the minimalist framework. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sapir, E. (1933). La réalité psychologique des phonèmes. Journal de Psychologie Normaleet Pathologique, 30, 247–265. [English version published in 1949 as The psychological reality of phonemes. In D. G. Mandelbaum (Ed.), Selected writings of Edward Sapir in language, culture and personality (pp. 46–60). Oakland, CA: University of California Press.]
Schiffrin, D. (1994). Approaches to discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.
Schilling-Estes, N., & Wolfram, W. (1994). Convergent explanation and alternative regularization patterns: Were/weren’t levelling in a vernacular English variety. Language Variation and Change, 6, 273–302.
Schneider, E. W. (2003). The dynamics of New Englishes: From identity construction to dialect birth. Language, 79, 233–281.
Schütze, C. (1999). English expletive constructions are not infected. Linguistic Inquiry, 30, 467–484.
Smallwood, C. (1997). Dis-agreement in Canadian English existentials. In Proceedings from the 1997 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association (pp. 227–238). Calgary: University of Calgary.
Smirnova, E. (2015). When secondary grammaticalization starts: A look from the constructional perspective. Language Sciences, 47, 215–228.
Smith, J., & Tagliamonte, S. A. (1998). ‘We were all thegither, I think we was all thegither’: Was regularization in Buckie English. World Englishes, 17, 105–126.
Sobin, N. (1997). Agreement, default rules and grammatical viruses. Linguistic Inquiry, 28, 318–343.
Tagliamonte, S. A. (1998). Was/were variation across the generations: View from the city of York. Language Variation and Change, 10, 153–192.
Tagliamonte, S. A. (2009). There was universals, then there weren’t: A comparative sociolinguistic perspective on ‘default singulars’. In M. Filppula, J. Klemola, & H. Paulasto (Eds.), Vernacular universals and language contacts: Evidence from varieties of English and beyond (pp. 103–129). New York and Oxford: Routledge.
Tagliamonte, S., & Smith, J. (1999). Analogical levelling in Samaná English: The case of was and were. Journal of English Linguistics, 27, 8–26.
Tortora, C. (1997). The syntax and semantics of the weak locative (Doctoral dissertation). University of Delaware, Newark, DE.
Tortora, C. (2006). The case of Appalachian expletive they. American Speech, 81, 266–296.
Tortora, C., & Den Dikken, M. (2010). Subject agreement variation: Support for the configurational approach. Lingua, 120, 1089–1108.
Trask, R. L. (1996). Historical linguistics. London: E. J. Arnold.
Traugott, E. C. (1982). From propositional to textual and expressive meanings: Some semantic-pragmatic aspects of grammaticalization. In W. P. Lehmann & Y. Malkiel (Eds.), Perspectives on historical linguistics (pp. 245–271). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Traugott, E. C. (1992). Syntax. In R. Hogg (Ed.), The Cambridge history of the English language (Vol. 1): The beginnings to 1066 (pp. 168–289). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (1995). Subjectification in grammaticalization. In D. Stein & S. Wright (Eds.), Subjectivity and subjectivisation in language (pp. 31–54). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (2002). From etymology to historical pragmatics. In D. Minkova & R. Stockwell (Eds.), Studies in the history of the English language (pp. 19–49). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E. C. (2003). From subjectification to intersubjectification. In R. Hickey (Ed.), Motives for language change (pp. 124–139). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Traugott, E. C. (2010). (Inter)subjectivity and (inter)subjectification: A reassessment. In H. Cuyckens, K. Davidse, & L. Vandelanotte (Eds.), Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization (pp. 29–70). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Traugott, E. C., & Dasher, R. B. (2002). Regularity in semantic change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Travis, L. M. (1984). Parameters and effects of word order variation (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
Trudgill, P. (2008). English dialect “defaults singulars”, was versus were, Verner’s law, and Germanic dialects. Journal of English Linguistics, 36, 341–353.
Trudgill, P. (2009). Vernacular universals and the sociolinguistic typology of English dialects. In M. Filppula, J. Klemola, & H. Paulasto (Eds.), Vernacular universals and language contacts: Evidence from varieties of English and beyond (pp. 304–322). London: Routledge.
Visser, F. Th. (1970). An historical syntax of the English language (Part one): Syntactical units with one verb (2nd impression). Leiden: E. J. Brill.
Von Mengden, F. (2016). Functional changes and (meta-)linguistic evolution. In M. Norde & F. Van de Velde (Eds.), Exaptation and language change (pp. 121–162). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Walker, J. (2007). “There’s bears back there”: Plural existentials and vernacular universals in (Quebec) English. English World-Wide, 28, 147–166.
Walker, J. (2013). Subject-verb agreement in English existentials: A cross-community comparison. Invited paper presented at the University of Bern, Switzerland.
Walker, J. (2014). Contrasting patterns of agreement in three communities. In N. Dion, A. Lapierre, & R. Torres Cacoullos (Eds.), Linguistic variation: Confronting fact and theory (pp. 7–21). London: Routledge.
Zwicky, A., & Pullum, G. (1983). Clitization vs. inflection: English n’t. Language, 59, 502–513.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rupp, L., Britain, D. (2019). Verbal –s in Existential there Sentences. In: Linguistic Perspectives on a Variable English Morpheme. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-72803-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-72803-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-4039-3968-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-349-72803-9
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)