Skip to main content

Fear, Loathing, and Empty Gestures: UK Legislation on Sport and the Transgender Participant

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transgender and Intersex: Theoretical, Practical, and Artistic Perspectives
  • 1388 Accesses

Abstract

The Gender Recognition Act 2004, s.19—which sought to restrict transgendered persons’ opportunities to participate in sports—was never argued before the courts of the UK before being repealed by the Equality Act 2010. The 2004 Act had sought to ban participation of transgendered persons in sports if their involvement was not conducive to either ‘competitive fairness’ or ‘safety’. This chapter explores the legal difficulties that were always bound to exist in enforcing a prohibition on either ground. It considers the relevant medical literature and fundamental legal principles that are common to most European jurisdictions in order to illustrate the difficulty of introducing lawful, effective constraints on transgender participation, and argues in favor of inclusivity for all sports participants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Works Cited

  • Bellinger v Bellinger [2003] 2 AC 467, HL 10 April 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett v the Football Association (1978) 28 July, unreported.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birrell, Susan, and Cheryl Cole. “Double Fault: Renee Richards and the Construction and Naturalization of Difference.” Sociology of Sport Journal 7.1 (1990): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. “Sport and Social Class.” Social Science Information 17.6 (1978): 819–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • British Judo Association v Petty [1981] ICR 660, EAT 16 June 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlish, Peter. “Transsexuals in Sport – A Level Playing Field?” International Sports Law Review 5.2 (2005): 38–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, Robert. Gender and Power. Cambridge: Polity, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couch v British Boxing Board of Control (1998) 30 May, unreported.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuypere, Griet, et al. “Sexual and Physical Health after Sex Reassignment Surgery.” Archives of Sexual Behaviour 34.6 (2005): 679–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Constitutional Affairs. Gender Recognition Bill: Response to the JCHR’s Nineteenth Report of Session 2002–03. London: Department of Constitutional Affairs, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, David. “The Impact of Human Rights on the UK Legislative Process.” Statute Law Review 25.2 (2004): 91–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, Jamie, and Walter Bockting. “Transgender Health.” Minnesota Medicine 86.7 (2003): 25–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson-Smith, Malcolm, and Elizabeth Ferris. “Gender Verification in Sport: The Need for Change?” British Journal of Sports Medicine 25.1 (1991): 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner v National Netball League [2001] FMCA 50, Fed Mag Ct, 18 July 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gender Recognition Act 2004, c 7. legislation.gov.uk. The National Archives, n.d. Web. 4 April 2005. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2004/7/contents.

  • Gender Recognition Bill. Second Reading. London: Hansard, 18 December 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gender Recognition Bill. House of Lords Grand Committee. London: Hansard, 13 January 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gender Recognition Bill. Third Reading. London: Hansard, 10 Feb 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin v The United Kingdom [2002] 35 EHRR 18 Eur Ct Hum Rts 11 July 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, Pat. Strong Women, Deep Closets: Lesbians and Homophobia in Sport. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, Arnold, Timothy O’Connell, and Anthony D’Augelli. “Leisure and Recreational ‘Girl-Boy’ Activities – Studying the Unique Challenges Provided by Transgendered Young People.” Leisure/Loisir 29.1 (2005): 5–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, Eduardo. “Sex Determination in Putative Female Athletes.” Journal of the American Medical Association 221.9 (1972): 998–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardwick v the Football Association (1997) 27 November, unreported.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood-Williams, John. “Sexing the Athletes.” Sociology of Sport Journal 12.3 (1995): 290–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houlihan, Barrie. Dying to Win: Doping in Sport and the Development of Anti-Doping Policy. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, David, and Carwen Jones. “Classification of Disabled Athletes: (Dis)Empowering the Paralympic Practice Community.” Sociology of Sport Journal 23.1 (2006): 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Interdepartmental Working Group on Transsexual People. Report of the Interdepartmental Working Group on Transsexual People. Home Office, April 2000. Web. 23 Feb. 2007. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.dca.gov.uk/constitution/transsex/wgtrans.pdf.

  • IOC. “IOC Approves Consensus with Regard to Athletes who have Changed Sex.” Olympic.org. IOC, 17 May 2004. Web. 10 Jan. 2007. http://www.olympic.org/content/news/media-resources/manual-news/1999-2009/2004/05/17/ioc-approves-consensus-with-regard-to-athletes-who-have-changed-sex/.

  • Joint Committee on Human Rights. Draft Gender Recognition Bill. London: HMSO, 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavanagh, Aileen. “The Role of Parliamentary Intention in Adjudication under the Human Rights Act 1998.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26.1 (2006): 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lester, Lord Anthony. “Parliamentary Scrutiny of Legislation under the Human Rights Act 1998.” Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 33.1 (2002): 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle, David. “Swallows and Amazons, or the Sporting Exception to the Gender Recognition Act.” Social and Legal Studies 17.1 (2008): 39–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennesson, Christine. “‘Hard’ Women and ‘Soft’ Women.” International Review for the Sociology of Sport 35.1 (2000): 21–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modahl v British Athletic Federation [1999] UKHL 37, HL, 22 July 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, Kenneth. “The Sexual Identity of Athletes.” Journal of the American Medical Association 205.11 (1968): 163–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeser, Johnathan. “Gender Identity and Sport: Is the Playing Field Level?” British Journal of Sports Medicine 39.10 (2005): 695–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Bernard, et al. “Gender Variance in the UK: Prevalence, Incidence, Growthand Geographic distribution.” Gires, 2009. Web. 2 March 2013. www.gires.org.uk/assets/Medpro-Assets/GenderVarianceUK-report.pdf.

  • Ritchie, Ian. “Sex Tested, Gender Verified: Controlling Female Sexuality in the Age of Containment.” Sport History Review 34.1 (2003): 80–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto, Hironosuke. “Femininity Control at the XXth Universiade in Kobe, Japan.” International Journal of Sports Medicine 9.3 (1988): 193–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Francisco Arts and Athletics v United States Olympic Committee [1987] 483 US 522, S Ct, June 25 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  • “Santhi’s Not the First to Be Doubted.” Times of India. Times of India, 19 Dec. 2006. Web. 10 Jan. 2007. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/843325.cms.

  • Sex Discrimination Act 1975, c 65. legislation.gov.uk. The National Archives, 29 Dec. 1975. Web. 29 Sep. 2014. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1975/65/contents.

  • Simpson, Joe, et al. “Gender Verification in Competitive Sports.” Sports Medicine 16.5 (1993): 305–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smoldon v Whitworth and Nolan [1997] PIQR 133, CA, 17 December 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Nancy. “‘America’s Sweetheart’ and ‘Czech-Mate’ – A Discursive Analysis of the Evert-Navratilova Rivalry.” Journal of Sport and Social Issues 27.1 (2003): 18–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. “Reading Between the Lines: A Discursive Analysis of the Billie Jean King v Bobby Riggs ‘Battle of the Sexes’.” Sociology of Sport Journal 17.4 (2000): 386–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, Caroline, and Ian Warren. “David v Goliath: The Gay Games, the Olympics and the Ownership of Language.” Entertainment and Sports Law Journal 4.1 (2006): 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veuthey, Alexandra. “Gender Verification: Between Fairness of Competition and Human Rights.” Citius, Altius, Fortius, Mélanges en l’honneur du Professeur Denis Oswald. Eds. Antonio Rigozzi, Dominique Sprumont, and Yann Hafner. Basel: Helbing Lichtenhahn, 2012. 131–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackwitz, Laura. “Sex Testing in International Women’s Athletics.” Women in Sport and Physical Activity Journal 5.1 (1996): 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson v British Boxing Board of Control [2001] QB 1134, CA, 19 December 2000.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

For an earlier version of this chapter, see McArdle (works cited list). Material from that paper is reproduced with the kind permission of Sage. This chapter was initially intended as joint paper with my colleague Alexandra Veuthey, but as the project developed it became apparent that we had radical differences of opinion over transgender participation and the adequacy of the sporting and juridical field’s responses to it. For her well-argued views on this challenging area of law, see Veuthey (works cited list).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

McArdle, D. (2016). Fear, Loathing, and Empty Gestures: UK Legislation on Sport and the Transgender Participant. In: Horlacher, S. (eds) Transgender and Intersex: Theoretical, Practical, and Artistic Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-71325-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics