Skip to main content

Human Rights and Neoliberal Wrongs in the Indigenous Child Welfare Space

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indigenous Justice

Part of the book series: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies ((PSLS))

  • 847 Accesses

Abstract

May 2017 marked the 20th anniversary of Bringing Them Home, the Australian Human Rights Commission report into the forced and unjustified removals of Indigenous children from their families (NISATSIC 1997). The report concluded that these actions were part of a sustained campaign by the Australian government to eradicate Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families, communities, and culture. Nearly a third of the report examined and made recommendations with respect to contemporary removals under child welfare, juvenile justice, and family law. These recommendations were part of the reparations and were aimed at creating laws and policies designed to ensure the discriminatory practices would cease and would not be repeated. Twenty years post-Bringing Them Home, however, Indigenous children are being removed from their families in unprecedented numbers (Libesman 2016, pp. 46–7).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, Recommendation 3 stating that, for the purposes of responding to the effects of forcible removals, ‘compensation’ be widely defined to mean ‘reparation’; that reparation be made in recognition of the history of gross violations of human rights; and that reparation consists of acknowledgment and apology, guarantees against repetition, measures of restitution, measures of rehabilitation, and monetary compensation (NISATSIC 1997).

  2. 2.

    In a presentation to the NSW Legal Aid Care and Protection Conference, 7 August 2015, Judge Peter Johnstone, President of the Children’s Court of NSW, noted, ‘I am informed nearly 50% of casework for children in the care of the Minister has been transferred to NGO’s.’

  3. 3.

    This language is pervasive in popular media. For an analysis of political rhetoric which frames Indigenous peoples as deficient, see, M. Lovell (2014) ‘Languages of neoliberal critique: The production of coercive government in the Northern Territory intervention’, in J. Uhr and R. Walter (eds), Studies in Australian Political Rhetoric, (Canberra: ANU ePress), 221–240.

  4. 4.

    For reduction in company tax, see, for example, S. Mann (2001) ‘The social cost of corporate welfare’, Australian Journal of Law and Society, 15, 209–222; for claims with respect to the cost of child welfare being unsustainable, see, for example, NSW government (2017) ‘Their Futures Matter: A New Approach to Reform Directions from the Independent Review of Out of Home Care in NSW’ https://www.facs.nsw.gov.au/__data/assets/file/0005/387293/FACS_OOHC_Review_161116.pdf, date accessed 10 April 2017. For a discussion of current (April 2017) debates to cut Australian company tax, see, for example, B. Oquest (2017) ‘The economic case for a company tax is collapsing’, https://www.crikey.com.au/2016/03/29/the-economic-case-for-a-company-tax-cut-is-collapsing, date accessed 10 April 2017.

  5. 5.

    For critical consideration of these programmes, see, for example, R. Scott and A. Heiss (eds) (2015) The Intervention: An Anthology, (Australia: Concerned Australians); N. Watson (2014) ‘From the Northern Territory Emergency Response to Stronger Futures–Where is the Evidence that Australian Aboriginal Women are Leading Self-Determining Lives?’ in S. Perera and S. H. Razack (eds), At the Limits of Justice: Women of Colour on Terror, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press) 335–355; S. Bielefeld (2016) ‘Income management and Indigenous women: A new chapter of patriarchal colonial governance?’ UNSW Law Journal, 39(2), 843–878; I. Katz and M. Raven (2013) ‘Evaluation of the Cape York Welfare Reform Trial’, Indigenous Law Bulletin, 8(7), 19–23.

  6. 6.

    This is in practice taking place through permanency planning. Advocacy for this approach is seen in J. Sammut (2014) The Kinship Conundrum: The Impact of Self-Determination on Indigenous Child Protection, (Sydney: Centre for Independent Studies).

  7. 7.

    See, for example, the Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency (https://www.vacca.org/), and for a discussion of the achievement of VACCA, see Libesman, above n.5, pp.160–4.

References

  • J. Anaya (2001) ‘The Influence of Indigenous Peoples on the Development of International Law’, in S. Garkawe, L. Kelly, and W. Fisher (eds) Indigenous Human Rights, (Sydney: Sydney Institute of Criminology), 109–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Anghie (2005) Imperialism, Sovereignty and the Making of International Law, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. Atkinson (2002) Trauma Trails, Recreating Song Lines: The Transgenerational Effects of Trauma in Indigenous Australia, (Melbourne: Spinifex Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) (2016) Child Protection Australia: 2015–16, (Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare).

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Productivity Commission (2016) Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage: Key Indicators, http://www.pc.gov.au/research/ongoing/overcoming-indigenous-disadvantage/key-indicators-2014, date accessed 19 April 2016.

  • L. Behrendt, C. Cunneen, and T. Libesman (2009) Indigenous Legal Relations in Australia, (Melbourne: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Bielefeld (2016) ‘Income Management and Indigenous Women: A New Chapter of Patriarchal Colonial Governance?’, UNSW Law Journal, 39(2), 843–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Blackstock (2016) ‘Surveillance, Stigma, Removal: Indigenous Child Welfare and Juvenile Justice in the Age of Neoliberalism’, Australian Indigenous Law Review, 19(1), 40–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Briskman (2003) The Black Grapevine – Aboriginal Activism and the Stolen Generations, (Sydney: Federation Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Brown (2000) ‘Suffering Rights as Paradoxes’, Constellations, 7(2), 230–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cape York Institute for Policy and Leadership (2007) ‘From Hand Out to Hand Up’, http://capeyorkpartnership.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/from-handout-to-hand-up-welfare-reform-report.pdf, date accessed 10 January 2016.

  • T. Carney (2006) ‘Neoliberal Welfare Reform and ‘Rights’ Compliance under Australian Social Security Law’, Australian Journal of Human Rights, 12(1), 223–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Family and Community Services Press Release (27 March 2017) ‘Building a Better Child Protection System’, https://www.facs.nsw.gov.au/reforms/children,-young-people-and-families/building-a-better-child-protection-system, date accessed 10 April 2017.

  • Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet (2017) ‘Closing the Gap: Prime Minister’s Report 2017’, Canberra: Australian Government.

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Douzinas (2000) The End of Human Rights: Critical Legal Thought at the Turn of the Century, (Oxford: Hart Publishing).

    Google Scholar 

  • Family Matters (2017) ‘Family Matters: Strong communities. Strong Culture. Stronger Children, Victoria’, http://www.familymatters.org.au/, date accessed 19 April 2017.

  • N. Fernbach (18 April 2017) ‘Community Legal Services Fear Cutbacks Will Impact Police, Hospital, Courts’, ABC News Online, http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2017-04-18/community-legal-service-cuts-impact/8443736?pfmredir=sm, date accessed 19 April 2017.

  • B. Golder (2011) ‘Foucault’s Critical (Yet Ambivalent) Affirmation: Three Figures of Rights’, Social and Legal Studies, 20 (3), 283–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Goodall (1996) From Invasion to Embassy: Land in Aboriginal Politics in New South Wales from 1780 to 1972, (Sydney: Allen and Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grandmothers Against Removals (2017) ‘Grandmothers Against Removals: Stop Stolen Generations, New South Wales’, http://stopstolengenerations.com.au/, date accessed 19 April 2017.

  • S. Gray (2015) ‘The Northern Territory Intervention: An Evaluation’, Castan Centre for Human Rights, https://www.monash.edu/law/research/centres/castancentre/our-research-areas/indigenous-research/the-northern-territory-intervention/the-northern-territory-intervention-an-evaluation, date accessed 10 April 2016.

  • M. Haly Knox (2010) ‘Neoliberalism and Child Protection: A Deadly Mix’, Labour History, 90, 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Howard-Wagner (2016) ‘Child Wellbeing and Protection as a Regulatory System in the Neoliberal age: Forms of Aboriginal Agency and Resistance Engaged to Confront the Challenges for Aboriginal People and Community Based Aboriginal Organisations’, Australian Indigenous Law Review, 19(1), 88–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. S. Jones (2012) Masters of the Universe: Hayek, Friedman, and the Birth of Neoliberal Politics, (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • I. Katz, and M. Raven (2013) ‘Evaluation of the Cape York Welfare Reform Trial’, Indigenous Law Bulletin, 8(7), 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Kennedy (2004) The Dark Sides of Virtue: Reassessing International Humanitarianism, (New Jersey: Princeton University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • T. Libesman (2014) Decolonising Indigenous Child Welfare: Comparative Perspectives, (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Libesman (2016) ‘Indigenous Child Welfare Post Bringing Them Home: From Aspirations for Self-determination to Neoliberal Assimilation’, Australian Indigenous Law Review, 19(1), 46–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Libesman and K. Cripps (2017) ‘Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children’s Welfare and Wellbeing’, in L. Young, M.A. Kenny and G. Monahan (eds) Children and the Law, (Chatswood, NSW: LexisNexis) 307–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Lovell (2014) ‘Languages of Neoliberal Critique: The Production of Coercive Government in the Northern Territory Intervention’, in J. Uhr and R. Walter (eds) Studies in Australian Political Rhetoric, (Canberra: ANU ePress), 221–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Mann (2001) ‘The Social Cost of Corporate Welfare’, Australian Journal of Law and Society, 15, 209–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Matua (2001) ‘Savages, Victims and Saviors: The Metaphor of Human Rights’, Harvard International Law Journal, 42(1), 201–245.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Matua (2002) Human Rights a Political and Cultural Critique, (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Moyn (2012) The Last Utopia, (Boston: Harvard University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from Their Families (NISATSIC) (1997) ‘Bringing Them Home: Report of the National Inquiry into the Separation of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Children from their Families’, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. Orford (2011) International Authority and the Responsibility to Protect, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • S. Pahuja (2011) Decolonising International Law, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory (2017) ‘Interim Report: Royal Commission into the Protection and Detention of Children in the Northern Territory’.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Sammut (2014) The Kinship Conundrum: The Impact of Self–determination on Indigenous Child Protection, (Sydney: Centre for Independent Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Scott and A. Heiss (eds) (2015) The Intervention: An Anthology, (Australia: Concerned Australians).

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Soss, R C. Fording, and S. F. Schram (2001) Disciplining the Poor: Neoliberal Paternalism and the Persistent Power of Race, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Victorian Aboriginal Child Care Agency (2017) https://www.vacca.org/, date accessed 29 July 2017.

  • L. Wacquant (2009) Punishing the Poor: The Neoliberal Government of Social Insecurity, (Durham: Duke University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • N. Watson (2014) ‘From the Northern Territory Emergency Response to Stronger Futures–Where is the Evidence that Australian Aboriginal Women are Leading Self-Determining Lives’ in S. Perera and S. H. Razack (eds), At the Limits of Justice: Women of Colour on Terror, (Toronto: University of Toronto Press), 335–355.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Libesman, T. (2018). Human Rights and Neoliberal Wrongs in the Indigenous Child Welfare Space. In: Hendry, J., Tatum, M., Jorgensen, M., Howard-Wagner, D. (eds) Indigenous Justice. Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60645-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60645-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60644-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-60645-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics