Pueblo Water Rights

  • Darren Modzelewski
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

Pueblo communities have lived in what is now the American southwest since time immemorial. They have practiced irrigated agriculture since well before the Spanish arrived in 1540 (Cohen’s Handbook 2012, §4.07(c); New Mexico v Abbot 2010). In the American West, water is allocated on a first-in-time basis—called prior appropriation. On its face, applying the rules of prior appropriation would appear to mean the Pueblos have paramount water rights to all other users. Yet, despite their long history of water use, Pueblo communities’ right to water remains in question. The story of why this is so illustrates some of the problems that occur when colonising powers treat Indigenous groups as if they have no laws and as if there is no differentiation among Indigenous groups. It also demonstrates how a focus on procedural details can provide the appearance of fairness while concealing substantive injustice (Hendry and Tatum 2016). This chapter will propose a new way of looking at the particular problem of the Pueblos of the American southwest and their rights to water.

References

  1. C. Briggs and J. Van Ness (eds) (1987) Land, Water, And Culture: New Perspectives On Hispanic Land Grants, (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press).Google Scholar
  2. Cohen’s Handbook of Federal Indian Law (2012) (Albuquerque: American Indian Law Center, 2012).Google Scholar
  3. C. Dumars, M. O’Leary, and A. E. Utton (1984) Pueblo Indian Water Rights: Struggles For A Precious Resource, (Tucson: University of Arizona Press).Google Scholar
  4. M. Ebright (1987) ‘New Mexican Land Grants: The Legal Background’ in C. Briggs and J. Van Ness (eds) Land, Water, and Culture: New Perspectives On Hispanic Land Grants, (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press).Google Scholar
  5. B. Ederington (1997) ‘Property as a Natural Institution: The Separation of Property from Sovereignty in International Law’, American University International Law Review, 13(2), 263–331.Google Scholar
  6. P. Gomez (1985) ‘The History and Adjudication of the Common Lands of Spanish and Mexican Land Grants’, Natural Resources Journal, 25, 1039–1080.Google Scholar
  7. J. Hendry and M. Tatum (2016) ‘Human Rights, Indigenous Peoples, and the Pursuit of Justice’, Yale Law and Policy Review,34, 351.Google Scholar
  8. R. Hughes (2017) ‘Pueblo Indian Water Rights: Charting the Unknown’, Natural Resources Journal, 57, 219–261.Google Scholar
  9. M. C. Myer (1996) Water in the Hispanic Southwest: A Social And Legal History, 1550–1850, (Tucson: University Of Arizona Press).Google Scholar
  10. D.P. O’Connell (1967) State Succession In Municipal Law And International Law, Volume 1, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).Google Scholar
  11. C. Schmitt (2005) Political Theology, (G. Schwab trs.), (Chicago: University Of Chicago Press).Google Scholar
  12. M. Sornarajah (ed.) (1986) The Pursuit of Nationalized Property, (Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands).Google Scholar
  13. United States Of America To Various Pueblos, 1 November 1864.Google Scholar
  14. M. Wilcox (2009) The Pueblo Revolt And The Mythology Of Conquest: An Indigenous Archaeology Of Contact, (Berkeley: University of California Press).Google Scholar
  15. R. A. Williams (2012) Savage Anxieties: The Making Of Western Civilization, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).Google Scholar

Legislation and Cases

  1. Pueblo Land Act of 1833.Google Scholar
  2. Pueblo Land Act of 1924.Google Scholar
  3. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848).Google Scholar
  4. Arizona v California (1963) 373 U.S. 546.Google Scholar
  5. Botiller v Dominguez (1889) 130 U.S. 238.Google Scholar
  6. Cherokee Nation v Georgia (1831) 30 U.S. (5 Peters) 1.Google Scholar
  7. Collins v Yosemite Park Co. (1938) 304 U.S. 518.Google Scholar
  8. Colville Confederated Tribes v Walton (1981) 647 F.2d 42 (9th Cir.).Google Scholar
  9. Enabling Act of New Mexico (1910).Google Scholar
  10. General Allotment Act (1887) 25 U.S.C. 331.Google Scholar
  11. Johnson v M’Intosh (1823) 21 (8 Wheat) 543.Google Scholar
  12. Morton v Mancari (1974) 417 U.S. 535.Google Scholar
  13. New Mexico v Aamodt (1976) 537 F.2d 1102 (10th Cir.) [Aamodt I].Google Scholar
  14. New Mexico v Abbot (2010) unpublished opinion case number 68cv7488 BB-ACE (U.S. Dist. Crt. Dist. N.M.).Google Scholar
  15. New Mexico ex rel. Reynolds v Aamodt (1985) 618 F. Supp. 993, 996 (D.N.M.) [Aamodt II].Google Scholar
  16. United States v Abousleman (1983) No. CIV-83-1041 SC (D.N.M.)Google Scholar
  17. United States v Adair (1983) 723 F.2d 1394.Google Scholar
  18. United States v. Canderlaria (1926) 271 U.S. 432.Google Scholar
  19. United States v District Court for Eagle County (1971) 401 U.S. 520.Google Scholar
  20. United States v Joseph (1876) 94 U.S. 614.Google Scholar
  21. United States v Lucero (1869) 1 N.M. 422 (N.M. Terr.).Google Scholar
  22. United States v Percheman (1833) 32 U.S. 51.Google Scholar
  23. United States v Sandoval (1913) 231 U.S. 28.Google Scholar
  24. United States v Soulard (1830) 29 U.S. 511.Google Scholar
  25. United States v Winans (1905) 198 U.S. 371.Google Scholar
  26. Winters v United States (1908) 207 U.S. 564.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darren Modzelewski
    • 1
  1. 1.University of ArizonaAZUSA

Personalised recommendations