Justice as Position, Justice as Practice: Indigenous Governance at the Boundary

  • Stephen Cornell
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

I begin with a story. The Nisga’a Nation is an Indigenous nation in the Canadian province of British Columbia. In 1999, after more than two decades of negotiations and more than a century of Nisga’a effort to prosecute their claims, the Nisga’a Nation, Canada, and British Columbia signed a treaty that restored to the Nisga’a people a portion of their traditional lands and certain Nisga’a rights of self-government, among them the rights to make law, to resolve disputes, and to control much of what happens on their lands. In 2000, after passage by the Canadian Senate and the provision of Royal Assent, the Nisga’a Final Agreement went into effect.

References

  1. R. D. Austin (2009) Navajo Courts and Navajo Common Law: A Tradition of Tribal Self-Governance, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).Google Scholar
  2. R. D. Austin (2011) ‘American Indian Customary Law in the Modern Courts of American Indian Nations’, Wyoming Law Review, 11(2), 351–73.Google Scholar
  3. R. L. Barsh (1999) ‘Putting the Tribe in Tribal Courts: Possible? Desirable?’, Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, 8, 74–97.Google Scholar
  4. BC Studies (1998/99) ‘The Nisga’a Treaty’, BC Studies, 120 (Winter).Google Scholar
  5. S. Brimley, S. Cornell, J. T. Flies-Away, M. Jorgensen, and R. R. Starks (2007) Resurgent Justice: Rebuilding the Mohawk Justice System. A Case Study for the Mohawk Council of Akwesasne, (Tucson: Native Nations Institute, The University of Arizona).Google Scholar
  6. D. Champagne and C. Goldberg (2012) Captured Justice: Native Nations and Public Law 280, (Durham: Carolina Academic Press).Google Scholar
  7. P. Chartrand (1999) ‘Aboriginal Peoples in Canada: Aspirations for Distributive Justice as Distinct Peoples: An Interview with Paul Chartrand’, in P. Havemann (ed.), Indigenous Peoples’ Rights in Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, (New York and Auckland: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  8. S. Cornell (2005) ‘Indigenous Peoples, Poverty, and Self-Determination in Australia, New Zealand, Canada, and the United States’, in R. Eversole, J-A. McNeish, and A. D. Cimadamore (eds), Indigenous Peoples and Poverty: An International Perspective, (London: Zed Books).Google Scholar
  9. S. Cornell (2013) ‘Reconstituting Native Nations: Colonial Boundaries and Institutional Innovation in Canada, Australia, and the United States’, in R. Walker, T. Jojola, and D. Natcher (eds), Reclaiming Indigenous Planning, (Montreal-Kingston: McGill-Queens University Press).Google Scholar
  10. S. Cornell, M. Jorgensen, and J. P. Kalt (2011) ‘Is There Only One Cultural Path to Development? Sustainable Heterogeneity among Contemporary American Indian Nations’, Unpublished Paper, Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google Scholar
  11. S. Cornell and J. P. Kalt (1992) ‘Reloading the Dice: Improving the Chances for Economic Development on American Indian Reservations’, in S. Cornell and J. P. Kalt (eds.), What Can Tribes Do? Strategies and Institutions in American Indian Economic Development, (Los Angeles: American Indian Studies Center, UCLA).Google Scholar
  12. S. Cornell and J. P. Kalt (1998) ‘Sovereignty and Nation Building: The Development Challenge in Indian Country Today’, American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 22(3), 187–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. S. Cornell and J. P. Kalt (2000) ‘Where’s the Glue? Institutional and Cultural Foundations of American Indian Economic Development’, Journal of Socio-Economics, 29, 443–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. S. Cornell and J. P. Kalt (2010) ‘American Indian Self-Determination: The Political Economy of a Policy that Works’, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, RWP10-043, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  15. N. A. Costello (1999) ‘Walking Together in a Good Way: Indian Peacemaker Courts in Michigan’, University of Detroit Mercy Law Review, 76, 185.Google Scholar
  16. A. Davies (2008) ‘Nothing to say sorry for: Howard’, Sydney Morning Herald, March 12, 1.Google Scholar
  17. N. B. Duthu (2013) Shadow Nations: Tribal Sovereignty and the Limits of Legal Pluralism, (New York: Oxford University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. J. T. Flies-Away, C. Garrow, and M. Jorgensen (2007) ‘Native Nation Courts: Key Players in Nation Rebuilding’, in M. Jorgensen (ed.), Rebuilding Native Nations: Strategies for Governance and Development, (Tucson: University of Arizona Press).Google Scholar
  19. Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (1999) ‘New and Old Law Together’, in Honoring Nations 1999: Tribal Governance Success Stories, (Cambridge: Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development).Google Scholar
  20. Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (2003) ‘Kake Circle Peacemaking’, in Honoring Nations 2003: Celebrating Excellence in Tribal Government, (Cambridge: Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development).Google Scholar
  21. Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (2005) ‘Choctaw Tribal Court System’, in Honoring Nations 2005: Celebrating Excellence in Tribal Governance, (Cambridge: Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development).Google Scholar
  22. Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (2008) The State of the Native Nations: Conditions under U.S. Policies of Self-Determination, (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  23. Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development (2010) ‘Joint Tribal-State Jurisdiction: Leech Lake Band of Ojibwe’, in Honoring Nations 2010: Celebrating 12 Years of Excellence in Tribal Government, (Cambridge: Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development).Google Scholar
  24. S. Hemming, D. Rigney, and S. Berg (2011) ‘Ngarrindjeri Futures: Negotiation, Governance and Environmental Management’, in S. Maddison and M. Brigg (eds.), Unsettling the Settler State: Creativity and Resistance in Indigenous Settler-State Governance, (Annandale, NSW: Federation Press).Google Scholar
  25. M. Jorgensen. (2009). ‘Self-Governed Dispute Resolution: Why Does It Matter? How is It Being Achieved?’, Presentation at the Aboriginal Policy Research Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, March 8.Google Scholar
  26. A. P. Melton (1995) ‘Indigenous Justice Systems and Tribal Society’, Judicature, 79(3), 126–33.Google Scholar
  27. T. Molloy (2000) The World Is Our Witness: The Historic Journey of the Nisga’a into Canada, (Calgary: Fifth House).Google Scholar
  28. M. O. Nielsen and J. W. Zion (eds) (2005) Navajo Nation Peacemaking: Living Traditional Justice, (Tucson: University of Arizona Press).Google Scholar
  29. L. Nesper (2007) ‘Negotiating Jurisprudence in Tribal Court and the Emergence of a Tribal State: The Lac du Flambeau Ojibwe’, Current Anthropology, 48(5), 675–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. N. J. Newton (1998) ‘Tribal Court Praxis: One Year in the Life of Twenty Indian Tribal Courts’, American Indian Law Review, 22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. T. O’Regan. (2014). ‘The Economics of Indigenous Survival and the Development of Culturally Relevant Governance’, Vincent Lingiari Memorial Address, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia, August 21.Google Scholar
  32. S. W. Perry (2005) Census of Tribal Justice Agencies in Indian Country, 2002, (Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of Justice Statistics).Google Scholar
  33. R. Porter (1997) ‘Strengthening Tribal Sovereignty Through Peacemaking: How the Anglo-American Legal Tradition Destroys Indigenous Societies’, Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 20, 235–304.Google Scholar
  34. J. B. Richland (2008) Arguing with Tradition: The Language of Law in Hopi Tribal Court, (Chicago: University of Chicago Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. A. R. Riley (2016) ‘Crime and Governance in Indian Country’, UCLA Law Review, 63(6), 1564–1637.Google Scholar
  36. A. Rose (2000) Spirit Dance at Meziadin: Chief Joseph Gosnell and the Nisga’a Treaty, (Madeira Park, BC: Harbour Publishing).Google Scholar
  37. M. Sahlins (2000) ‘What Is Anthropological Enlightenment? Some Lessons of the Twentieth Century’, in M. Sahlins, Culture as Practice: Selected Essays, (New York: Zone Books).Google Scholar
  38. D. Sanders (1999) ‘“We Intend to Live Here Forever”: A Primer on the Nisga’a Treaty’, University of British Columbia Law Review, 33(1), 103–28.Google Scholar
  39. M. T. Sierra (2005) ‘The Revival of Indigenous Justice in Mexico: Challenges for Human Rights and the State’, PoLAR: Political and Legal Anthropology Review, 28(1), 52–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. D. Smith (2008) ‘Cultures of Governance and the Governance of Culture: Transforming and Containing Indigenous Institutions in West Arnhem Land’, in J. Hunt, D. Smith, S. Garling, and W. Sanders (eds), Contested Governance: Culture, Power, and Institutions in Indigenous, Centre for Aboriginal Economic Policy Research, Research Monograph No. 29, (Canberra: The Australian National University E Press).Google Scholar
  41. M. L. Tatum (2007) ‘Tribal Courts: The Battle to Earn Respect without Sacrificing Culture and Tradition’, in L. C. Backer (ed.), Harmonizing Law in an Era of Globalization: Convergence, Divergence and Resistance, (Durham: Carolina Academic Press).Google Scholar
  42. C. N. Vicenti (1995) ‘The Reemergence of Tribal Society and Traditional Justice Systems’, Judicature, 79(3), 134–41.Google Scholar
  43. S. Wakeling, M. Jorgensen, S. Michaelson, and M. Begay (2001) Policing on American Indian Reservations, (Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. R. A. Williams, Jr. (2005) Like a Loaded Weapon: The Rehnquist Court, Indian Rights, and the Legal History of Racism in America, (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. R. Yazzie. (2008). ‘The Life Way and the Law Way’, in Harvard Project on American Indian Economic Development, The State of the Native Nations: Conditions under U.S. Policies of Self-Determination, (New York: Oxford University Press).Google Scholar
  46. J. W. Zion (2009) ‘Beyond Colonialism: Indian Courts in the Present and the Future’, in M. O. Nielsen and R. A. Silveman (eds), Criminal Justice in Native America, (Tucson: University of Arizona Press).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Cornell
    • 1
  1. 1.Native Nations InstituteUniversity of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations