Skip to main content

Thoughts on the ‘Law of the Land’ and the Persistence of Aboriginal Law in Australia

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Indigenous Justice

Abstract

Warlpiri people have lived in their homelands for countless generations. Western Europeans began to intrude into these places only a century ago. Since that first contact, kardiya have shot, poisoned, forcibly relocated, and enslaved yapa. They have imposed foreign ideas upon yapa, and despised yapa ways of being—ceremonies, language, relationships, connection to country, cosmology, and law (Reynolds 1987, 1989). Some Warlpiri call this ngurra-kurlu (Pawu-Kurlpurlurnu et al. 2008). It is the Warlpiri way of being, and order of things.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Aboriginal people have been on the continent of Australia at least 57,000 years (Thorne et al. 1999).

  2. 2.

    Kardiya is a Gurindji word that Warlpiri have adopted that broadly means non-Aboriginal people (Swartz 2012), but can have particular meaning depending on the context; here we mean western European-descended, settler-colonisers in Australia.

  3. 3.

    Yapa literally means ‘people’; often used to mean only ‘Warlpiri people’, in context it can mean ‘Aboriginal people’ in continental Australia. CfKardiya’ above n2.

  4. 4.

    Milpirri is a bi-annual festival held in late October in Lajamanu. This discussion of pulyaranyi is drawn from discussions with collaborators in Lajamanu in 2012, when the theme of Milpirri was Pulyaranyi (see Patrick 2015). Jerry Jangala Patrick described pulyaranyi as a ceremony in which he participated as a young man, before Warlpiri people were forced to move to Hooker Creek ‘Native Settlement’ (now Lajamanu) around 1952 (personal communication with Williams 2011, 2012).

  5. 5.

    Other dialects call ‘country’ ngurrara. For example the Walmajarri, Wangkajunga, Mangala, and Juwaliny peoples, who painted their ngurrara to claim native title (O’Donoghue 2001, ix).

  6. 6.

    There are earlier cases in the Northern Territory courts where defendants claimed ‘payback’, but were not, in fact, instances of lawful processes of yaru mani-kujaku.

References

  • J. C. Altman (2011) ‘A Genealogy of ‘Demand Sharing’: From Pure Anthropology to Public Policy’, in Y. Musharbash and M. Barber (eds.), Ethnography and the Production of Anthropological Knowledge: Essays in Honour of Nicolas Peterson, (Canberra: ANU E Press), 187–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Law Reform Commission (1986) The Recognition of Aboriginal Customary Laws, (Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Baudrillard and M. Guillaume (2008) Radical Alterity, (France: Semiotext(e)).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Bhabha (1994) The Location of Culture, (New York: Routledge).

    Google Scholar 

  • S. W. Blackstone and G. Sharswood (1866) Commentaries on the Laws of England: in Four Books, GW Childs (ed.) Book 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Chanock (1985) Law, Custom and Social Order: The Colonial Experience in Malawi and Zambia, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), cited in J. L. Comaroff (2001) ‘Colonialism, Culture, and the Law: A foreword’, Law & Social Inquiry, 26(2), 305–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • A. J. Corn and W. J. Patrick (2015) ‘Pulyaranyi: New Educational Contexts for Transferring Warlpiri Knowledge’, UNESCO Observatory Multi-Disciplinary Journal in the Arts, 4(2), 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Darian-Smith (2013) Laws and Societies in Global Contexts: Contemporary Approaches, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Dennison (2014) ‘The Logic of Recognition: Debating Osage Nation Citizenship in the Twenty-first Century’, The American Indian Quarterly, 38(1), 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • L. Dousset (2013) ‘Inclusion-Exclusion: Recasting the Issue of Boundaries for the Western Desert’, Anthropological Forum, 23(4), 342–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Hage (2009) ‘The Open Mind and Its Enemies: Anthropology and the Passion of the Political’, Inaugural Distinguished Address Australian Anthropological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Hoogenraad and M. Laughren (2012) Warlpiri Picture Dictionary: warlpiri yimi kuruwarri-kirli, (Alice Springs: IAD Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • kangaroovindaloo (2008) Ngurra-kurlu, online video, viewed 25 July 2014, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iFZq7AduGrc

  • N. Mezey (2001) ‘Law as Culture’, Yale Journal of Law and Humanities, 13, 35–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Y. Musharbash (2009) Yuendumu Everyday: Contemporary Life in Remote Aboriginal Australia, (Canberra: Aboriginal Studies Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • F. R. Myers (1986) ‘Reflections on a Meeting: Structure, Language, and the Polity in a Small-Scale Society’, American Ethnologist, 13, 430–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • F. R. Myers (1988) ‘Burning the Truck and Holding the Country: Property, Time and the Negotiation of Identity Among Pintupi Aborigines’, in E. N. Wilmsen (ed.), We Are Here: Politics of Aboriginal Land Tenure, (California: University of California Press), 15–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • F. R. Myers (1991) Pintupi Country, Pintupi Self: Sentiment, Place, and Politics Among Western Desert Aborigines, (California: University of California Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Nash (2016) Personal Communication to MS Williams, September 2016 (Canberra).

    Google Scholar 

  • L. O’Donoghue (2001) ‘Introduction’, in I. Chance (ed), Kaltja Now: Indigenous Arts Australia, (Adelaide: Wakefield Press), ix.

    Google Scholar 

  • J. J. Patrick (2014) Senior Law Man, Personal Communication with M. S. Williams, September–December 2011, October–November 2012, November 2014; Lajamanu, NT.

    Google Scholar 

  • W. S. J. Patrick and G. Louw (2016) ‘The Home Within: YAMA and Ngurra Kurlu’, Furtherfield, http://furtherfield.org/features/articles/home-within-yama-and-ngurra-kurlu , date accessed 29 July 2017.

  • W. S. J. Patrick (2015) ‘Pulya-ranyi: Winds of Change’, Cultural Studies Review, 21(1), 121–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. J. Pawu-Kurlpurlurnu, M. Holmes, and A. L. Box (2008) ‘Ngurra-kurlu: A Way of Working with Warlpiri People’, Report no. 41, (Alice Springs, N.T.: Desert Knowledge Cooperative Research Centre).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. A. Povinelli (1995) ‘Do Rocks Listen?’ American Anthropologist, 97(3), 505–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. A. Povinelli (2001) ‘Radical Worlds: The Anthropology of Incommensurability and Inconceivability’, Annual Review of Anthropology, 319–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Pratt (2006) ‘The Dark Side of Paradise Explaining New Zealand’s History of High Imprisonment’, British Journal of Criminology, 46(4), 541–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. L. Pratt (1992) Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation, (London: Routledge).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • H. Reynolds (1987) Frontier: Aborigines, Settlers and Land, (North Sydney: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Reynolds (1989) Dispossession, (Sydney: Allen & Unwin).

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Said (1994). Culture and Imperialism, (London: Vintage).

    Google Scholar 

  • B. d. S. Santos (2015) ‘Can Law be Emancipatory? 20 Years Later’, Paper Presented at the Transnational Law Summer Institute Distinguished Lecture, King’s College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • G. C. Spivak (1988) ‘Can the Subaltern Speak?’ in P. Williams and L. Chrisman (eds), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, (New York: University of Illinois Press), 66–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • S. M. Swartz (2012) Warlpiri—English Dictionary: With English—Warlpiri finderlist (2nd edn) AusIL Dictionary Series A-3, http://ausil.org/Dictionary/Warlpiri/lexicon/index.htm, date accessed 28 July 2017.

  • A. Thorne, R. Grün, G. Mortimer, N. A. Spooner, J. J. Simpson, M. McCulloch, and D. Curnoe (1999) ‘Australia’s Oldest Human Remains: Age of the Lake Mungo 3 Skeleton’, Journal of Human Evolution, 36(6), 591–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Tonkinson (2003) ‘Ambrymese Dreams and the Mardu Dreaming’, in R. I. Lohmann (ed.), Dream Travelers: Sleep Experiences and Culture in the Western Pacific, (New York: Palgrave), 87–105.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • J. Webber (1995) ‘Relations of Force and Relations of Justice: The Emergence of Normative Community between Colonists and Aboriginal Peoples’, Osgoode Hall LJ, 33, 623.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. S. Williams (2013) ‘Making Sense of Riot: The Fragile Legitimacy of Police Powers and Public Order Offences in an Intervention’, in I. Bartkowiak-Theron & M. Travers (eds.), The 6th Annual Australian and New Zealand Critical Criminology Conference, 74–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Williams (forthcoming) A Legal Concept of Culture: Cases from Central Australian Sentencing Courts (Doctoral thesis).

    Google Scholar 

Legislation and Cases

  • Crimes Act (1914) (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • Northern Territory National Emergency Response Act (2007) (Cth).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmy v The Queen (2013) 249 CLR 571.

    Google Scholar 

  • ‘Calvin’s Case’ (1608) Co Rep 1a (‘Case of the Postnati’).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper v Stuart (1889) 14 App Cas 286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milirrpum v Nabalco Pty Ltd (1971) 17 FLR 141 (‘Aboriginal Land Rights/Gove Island Land Rights’).

    Google Scholar 

  • Police v Dickenson & Ors (2010) (Unreported, Alice Springs Court of Summary Jurisdiction, Bamber M, 1 December 2010).

    Google Scholar 

  • R v Wunungmurra (2009) (Unreported, Northern Territory Supreme Court, Southwood J, 9 June 2009).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Patrick, W.S.J., Williams, M.S. (2018). Thoughts on the ‘Law of the Land’ and the Persistence of Aboriginal Law in Australia. In: Hendry, J., Tatum, M., Jorgensen, M., Howard-Wagner, D. (eds) Indigenous Justice. Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60645-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60645-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60644-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-60645-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics