Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gender, Work and Social Control

Part of the book series: Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies ((PSLS))

Abstract

The Introduction sets the book in the context of current debates surrounding Employment and Support Allowance. It explains how concerns about how to assess incapacity for work for benefits purposes date back to the first National Insurance Sickness Benefits in 1911. The chapter begins with an exploration of a key legal case, the case of Mrs E from the 1950s. Mrs E’s appeal to the National Insurance Commissioners, known as R(S)11/51, reflected many of the debates from the early twentieth century and provided the key case law for the next forty years. Her case illustrates many of the debates explored in the book. Over the last hundred years, debates about incapacity benefits have concerned disability, gender, the meaning of work and mechanisms for social control. This chapter introduces these concepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I refer to Mrs E, rather than using her full name. For details of my approach to anonymity and other ethical matters, see the Appendix.

  2. 2.

    For details of archives, see Appendix.

  3. 3.

    For details of the main incapacity benefit schemes, including changes to names of benefits and mechanisms for appeal, see Chapter 2.

References

  • Adler, Michael, and Jackie Gulland. 2003. Tribunal Users’ Experiences, Perceptions and Expectations: A Literature Review. London: Council on Tribunals. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100910235604/http://www.council-on-tribunals.gov.uk/publications/577.htm.

  • Baldwin, Sally, and Jane Falkingham. 1994. Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bambra, Clare. 2011. Work, Worklessness, and the Political Economy of Health. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Colin. 1991. Disabled People in Britain and Discrimination. London: Hurst and Company/BCoDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. ‘A Working Social Model? Disability, Work and Disability Politics in the 21st Century’. Critical Social Policy 20 (4): 441–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. ‘Re-thinking Disability, Work and Welfare’. Sociology Compass 6 (6): 472–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Colin, and Alan Roulstone. 2005. ‘“Work” Is a Four-Letter Word; Disability, Work and Welfare’. In Working Futures? Disabled People, Policy and Social Inclusion, edited by Alan Roulstone and Colin Barnes. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, Colin, and Geof Mercer. 2005. ‘Disability, Work and Welfare: Challenging the Social Exclusion of Disabled People’. Work, Employment & Society 19 (3): 527–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Zygmunt. 2005. Work, Consumerism and the New Poor. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, Christina, Steve Fothergill, Donald Houston, and Ryan Powell. 2010. ‘Bringing Incapacity Benefit Numbers Down: To What Extent Do Women Need a Different Approach?’ Policy Studies 31: 143–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, Christina, Steve Fothergill, Donald Houston, Ryan Powell, and Paul Sissons. 2009. ‘A Gendered Theory of Employment, Unemployment and Sickness’. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy 27 (6): 958–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, Sir William. 1942. Social Insurance and Allied Services. Cmnd. 6404. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsay, Anne. 2004. Disability and Social Policy in Britain Since 1750: A History of Exclusion. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie, Douglas, Nicole Busby, and Rebecca Zahn, eds. 2016. The Future Regulation of Work: New Concepts, New Paradigms. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodkin, Evelyn, and Gregory Marston. 2013. Work and the Welfare State: Street-Level Organisations and Workfare Politics. Washington: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodkin, Evelyn, and Malay Majmunder. 2010. ‘Administrative Exclusion: Organizations and the Hidden Costs of Welfare Claiming’. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 20: 827–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Busby, Nicole. 2011. A Right to Care? Unpaid Work in European Employment Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Judith. 2006. Gender Trouble. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clasen, Jochen, and Daniel Clegg. 2007. ‘Levels and Levers of Conditionality: Measuring Change Within Welfare States’. In Investigating Welfare State Change: The Dependent Variable Problem in Comparative Analysis, edited by Jochen Clasen and Nico Siegel. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Mary, and Katherine Rake. 2003. Gender and the Welfare State. Oxford: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Disability Alliance. 1987. Poverty and Disability: Breaking the Link: The Case for a Comprehensive Disability Income Scheme. London: Disability Alliance Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean, Hartley. 2000. ‘Managing Risk by Controlling Behaviour: Social Security Administration and the Erosion of Welfare Citizenship’. In Risk, Trust and Welfare, edited by Peter Taylor-Gooby. Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, Peter. 2016. ‘Citizenship, Conduct and Conditionality: Sanction and Support in the 21st Century UK Welfare State’. In Social Policy Review 28: Analysis and Debate in Social Policy, 2016, edited by Menno Fenger, John Hudson, and Catherine Needham, 41. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwyer, Peter, and Sharon Wright. 2014. ‘Universal Credit, Ubiquitous Conditionality and Its Implications for Social Citizenship’. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 22 (1): 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, Del Roy, John Flint, Elaine Batty, and Jennifer McNeill. 2016. ‘Gamers or Victims of the System? Welfare Reform, Cynical Manipulation and Vulnerability’. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 24 (2): 171–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, William Justus, and FG Taylor. 1937. National Health Insurance. 3rd ed. London: Sir Isaac Pitman and Sons Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, Michel. 1972. The Archaeology of Knowledge (Trans Alan Sheridan). London: Tavistock.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (Trans Alan Sheridan). London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayne, David. 2015. The Refusal of Work: The Theory and Practice of Resistance to Work. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, Sally, and John Swain. 2012. Working with Disabled People in Policy and Practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge, Judy. 2016. ‘A New Vocabulary and Imaginary for Labour Law’. In The Future Regulation of Work New Concepts, New Paradigms, edited by Douglas Brodie, Nicole Busby, and Rebecca Zahn. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilliom, John. 2001. Overseers of the Poor: Surveillance, Resistance, and the Limits of Privacy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glucksmann, Miriam. 2000. Cottons and Casuals: The Gendered Organisation of Labour in Time and Space. Durham: Sociology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, Keith, and Darren Nixon. 2015. The Sociology of Work. 4th ed. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grover, Chris, and Linda Piggott. 2010. ‘From Incapacity Benefit to Employment and Support Allowance: Social Sorting, Sickness and Impairment, and Social Security’. Policy Studies 31: 265–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grue, Jan. 2015. Disability and Discourse Analysis. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulland, Jackie. 1996. ‘Weighing up the Bag of Potatoes Test: Tribunals and Incapacity Benefit (Unpublished MSc Dissertation)’. Edinburgh: University of Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. ‘Ticking Boxes: Understanding Decision Making in Employment and Support Allowance’. Journal of Social Security Law 18: 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hampton, Jameel. 2016. Disability and the Welfare State in Britain: Changes in Perception and Policy 1948–79. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler, Joel F. 2004. Social Citizenship and Workfare in the United States and Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Bill. 2015. ‘What Can a Foucauldian Analysis Contribute’. In Foucault and the Government of Disability, edited by Shelley Tremain, 2nd ed. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, Rosemary. 2013. ‘The Gendered “Socio” of Socio-Legal Studies’. In Exploring the ‘Socio’ in Socio-Legal Studies, edited by Dermot Feenan. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, Peter, and Jacqueline Davidson. 2009. ‘Gender Differences Among New Claimants for Incapacity Benefit’. Journal of Social Policy 38: 589–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Land, Hilary. 1994. ‘The Demise of the Male Breadwinner—In Practice But Not in Theory: A Challenge for Social Security Systems’. In Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model, edited by Sally Baldwin and Jane Falkingham. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. ‘Slaying Idleness Without Killing Care: A Challenge for the British Welfare State’. In Social Policy Review 21, edited by K. Rummery, Ian Greener, and Chris Holden. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, Charles. 1926. Report of the Royal Commission on National Health Insurance. Cmd. 2596. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lens, Vicki. 2015. ‘Welfare Law’. In The Handbook of Law and Society, edited by Austin Sarat and Patricia Ewick. Chichester: Wiley Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesser, Henry. 1939. The National Health Insurance Acts 1936-1938 with Explanatory Notes, Reported Cases, Decisions of the Minister of Health and Statutory Rules and Orders. London: Stone and Cox Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine-Clark, Marjorie. 2015. Unemployment, Welfare and Masculine Citizenship: So Much Honest Poverty in Britain 1870–1930. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsky, Michael. 2010. Street Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services. 30th Anniversary Expanded Edition. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lister, Ruth. 1994. ‘“She Has Other Duties”—Women, Citizenship and Social Security’. In Social Security and Social Change: New Challenges to the Beveridge Model, edited by Sally Baldwin and Jane Falkingham. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. Citizenship: Feminist Perspectives. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mashaw, Jerry. 1983. Bureaucratic Justice: Managing Social Security Disability Claims. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macnicol, John. 2013. ‘The History of Work Disability’. In Disability Benefits, Welfare Reform and Employment Policy, edited by Colin Lindsay and Donald Houston. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Health. 1923. Reports of Decisions on Appeals and Applications Under Section 67 of the National Insurance Act 1911 and Section 27 of the National Insurance Act 1913, Vol 2—Part I. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munger, Frank. 2004. ‘Rights in the Shadow of Class’. In The Blackwell Companion to Law and Society, edited by Austin Sarat. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health Insurance Commission. 1915. National Insurance Acts Handbook for the Use of Approved Societies (English Edition). London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health Insurance Commission (England). 1915a. Reports of Decisions on Appeals and Applications Under Section 67 of the National Insurance Act 1911 and Section 27 of the National Insurance Act 1913. Cd. 7810.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1915b. Reports of Decisions on Appeals and Applications Under Section 67 of the National Insurance Act 1911 and Section 27 of the National Insurance Act 1913 Part II. Cd. 8040. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1916. Reports of Decisions on Appeals and Applications Under Section 67 of the National Insurance Act 1911 and Section 27 of the National Insurance Act 1913 Part III Cd. 8239. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1917. Reports of Decisions on Appeals and Applications Under Section 67 of the National Insurance Act 1911 and Section 27 of the National Insurance Act 1913 Part IV Cd. 8474. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1919. Reports of Decisions on Appeals and Applications Under Section 67 of the National Insurance Act 1911 and Section 27 of the National Insurance Act 1913 Part V Cmd. 134. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health Insurance Commission (Ireland). 1916. Reports of Decisions on Appeals and Applications Under Section 67 of the National Insurance Act, 1911 and Section 27 of the National Insurance Act, 1913. Dublin: A Thom.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Health Insurance Joint Committee. 1914. National Health Insurance. Report of the Departmental Committee on Sickness Benefit Claims Under the National Insurance Act. Cd. 7687. London: HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogus, Anthony, and Eric Barendt. 1978. The Law of Social Security. London: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orloff, Ann Shola. 2010. ‘Gender’. In The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, edited by Francis G. Castles, Stephan Liebfried, Jane Lewis, and Christopher Pierson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl, Ray. 1984. Divisions of Labour. London: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, Ruth. 2011. Disabling or Enabling: The Extension of Work-Related Conditionality to Disabled People. Social Policy and Society 10 (3): 309–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, Ruth, Patience Seebohm, and Lawrence M. Mead. 2011. ‘The Wrong Prescription: Disabled People and Welfare Conditionality’. Policy & Politics 39 (2): 275–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, Susan. 1993. Family, Dependence, and the Origins of the Welfare State: Britain and France, 1914–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piven, Frances Fox, and Richard A. Cloward. 1972. Regulating the Poor: The Functions of Public Welfare. New York: Vintage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prideaux, Simon, Alan Roulstone, Jennifer Harris, and Colin Barnes. 2009. ‘Disabled People and Self‐directed Support Schemes: Reconceptualising Work and Welfare in the 21st Century’. Disability & Society 24 (5): 557–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryma, Jane. 2017. ‘“Even My Sister Says I’m Acting Like a Crazy to Get a Check”: Race, Gender, and Moral Boundary-Work in Women’s Claims of Disabling Chronic Pain’. Social Science & Medicine 181 (Supplement C): 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Emily. 2010. ‘Touching the Void: Affective History and the Impossible’. Rethinking History: The Journal of Theory and Practice 14: 503–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roulstone, Alan. 2012. ‘Disabled People, Work and Employment’. In Routledge Handbook of Disability Studies, edited by Nick Watson, Alan Roulstone, and Carol Thomas. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roulstone, Alan, and Simon Prideaux. 2012. Understanding Disability Policy. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlingson, Karen. 2009. ‘From Cradle to Grave: Social Security and the Lifecourse’. In Understanding Social Security, edited by Jane Millar, 2nd ed. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherry, Mark. 2016. ‘A Sociology of Impairment’. Disability & Society 31 (6): 729–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, Margrit. 1997. Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)Ethics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, Deborah. 1984. The Disabled State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thane, Pat. 1991. ‘Visions of Gender in the Making of the British Welfare State: The Case of Women in the British Labour Party and Social Policy 1906–1945’. In Maternity and Gender Policies: Women and the Rise of the European Welfare States 1880s–1950s, edited by Gisela Bock and Pat Thane. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, Carol. 2011. ‘Disability: Prospects for Inclusion’. In Fighting Poverty, Inequality and Injustice: A Manifesto Inspired by Peter Townsend, edited by Alan Walker, Adrian Sinfield, and Carol Walker. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Union of Physically Impaired Against Segregation, and Disability Alliance. 1976. Fundamental Principles of Disability. London: UPIAS. http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/UPIAS-fundamental-principles.pdf.

  • Valverde, Mariana. 2009. ‘Jurisdiction and Scale: Legal “Technicalities” as Resources for Theory’. Social & Legal Studies 18 (2): 139–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, Alan. 2010. ‘Disability’. In The Peter Townsend Reader, edited by Alan Walker, David Gordon, Ruth Levitas, Peter Phillimore, Chris Phillipson, Margot Salomon, and Nicola Yeates. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, Beth, Suzanne Fitzpatrick, Glen Bramley, and David Watkins. 2014. Welfare Sanctions and Conditionality in the UK. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weeks, Kathi. 2011. The Problem with Work: Feminism, Marxism, Antiwork Politics, and Postwork Imaginaries. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willott, Sarah, and Christine Griffin. 1996. ‘Men, Masculinity and the Challenge of Long-Term Unemployment’. In Understanding Masculinities, edited by Mairtin Mac an Ghaill. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Sharon. 2003. ‘The Street-Level Implementation of Unemployment Policy’. In Understanding Social Security, edited by Jane Miller. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jackie Gulland .

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gulland, J. (2019). Introduction. In: Gender, Work and Social Control. Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60564-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60564-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60562-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-60564-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics