Advertisement

Nobody's Law pp 149-174 | Cite as

Marking the Unremarkable

  • Marc Hertogh
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

The first half of this chapter summarizes the main findings from the three case studies. All cases illustrate a disconnection between ‘internal’ and ‘external’ understandings of law. The cases also cover a wide spectrum of legal alienation. Finally, they suggest that legal alienation is a process rather than a state. The second half of this chapter aims to generalize these findings beyond the specific context of the cases. First, it is estimated that—in the Netherlands—more than five out of ten people are affected by some form of legal alienation. Second, legal alienation can affect both ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’, and is not—by definition—associated with socially marginalized groups. Finally, legal alienation erodes legal compliance.

Keywords

Legal alienation Legitimacy erosion Compliance 

References

  1. Abrego, L. (2011). Legal Consciousness of Undocumented Latinos: Fear and Stigma as Barriers to Claims-Making for First-and 1.5 Generation Immigrants. Law & Society Review, 45(2), 337–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Achterberg, P., & Mascini, P. (2013). Kenmerken Nederlanders die de rechtspraak wantrouwen zich door institutioneel wantrouwen in het algemeen? Nederlands Juristen Blad, 11, 671–677.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, E. (1999). Code of the Street: Democracy, Violence, and the Moral Life of the Inner City. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  4. Beetham, D. (1991). The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bijl, R., et al. (Eds.). (2015). De Sociale Staat van Nederland 2015. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  6. Bijleveld, C., et al. (2007). Ethnic Minorities and Confidence in the Dutch Criminal-Justice System. In T. Tyler (Ed.), Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Perspective (pp. 277–301). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  7. Bottoms, A., & Tankebe, J. (2012). Beyond Procedural Justice: A Dialogic Approach to Legitimacy in Criminal Justice. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 119–170.Google Scholar
  8. Carr, P., et al. (2007). We Never Call the Cops and Here Is Why: A Qualitative Examination of Legal Cynicism in Three Philadelphia Neighborhoods. Criminology, 45(2), 445–479.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cowan, D. (2004). Legal Consciousness: Some Observations. The Modern Law Review, 67(6), 928–958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creutzfeldt, N., & Bradford, B. (2016). Dispute Resolution Outside of Courts: Procedural Justice and Decision Acceptance Among Users of Ombuds Services in the UK. Law & Society Review, 50(4), 985–1016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dekker, P., & Van der Meer, T. (2007). Vertrouwen in de rechtspraak nader onderzocht. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  12. Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. (1998). The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Genn, H. (1999). Paths to Justice: What People Do and Think About Going to Law. Oxford/Portland Oregon: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
  14. Geyer, F. (1996). Alienation Theories: A General Systems Approach. Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hertogh, M. (2004). A “European” Conception of Legal Consciousness: Rediscovering Eugen Ehrlich. Journal of Law and Society, 31(4), 457–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hertogh, M. (2011). Loyalists, Cynics and Outsiders. Who Are the Critics of the Justice System in the UK and the Netherlands? International Journal of Law in Context, 7(1), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hertogh, M. (2014). “No Justice, No Peace!” Conceptualizing Legal Alienation in the Aftermath of the Trayvon Martin Case. In R. Nobles & E. Schiff (Eds.), Law, Society and Community: Socio-legal Essays in Honour of Roger Cotterrell (pp. 187–206). Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  18. Hertogh, M. (2015). What Moves Joe Driver? How Perceptions of Legitimacy Shape Regulatory Compliance Among Dutch Traffic Offenders. International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 43(2), 214–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hertogh, M. L. M., Winter, H. B., & Schudde, L. T. (2012). Een factuurtje uit Leeuwarden. De invloed van legitimiteit op het nalevings-en betalingsgedrag van CJIB-debiteuren. Groningen: Rijksuniversiteit Groningen.Google Scholar
  20. Huijnk, W., & Andriessen, I. (Eds.). (2016). Integratie in zicht? De integratie van migranten in Nederland op acht terreinen nader bekeken. Den Haag: Sociaal en Cultureel Planbureau.Google Scholar
  21. Hyde, A. (1983). The Concept of Legitimation in the Sociology of Law. Wisconsin Law Review, 379–426.Google Scholar
  22. Jackson, J., Bradford, B., Hough, M., Myhill, A., Quinton, P., & Tyler, T. R. (2012). Why Do People Comply with the Law? Legitimacy and the Influence of Legal Institutions. British Journal of Criminology, 52(6), 1051–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joseph, C., & Somaiya, R. (2013). Demonstrations Across the Country Commemorate Trayvon Martin. The New York Times. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/07/21/us/demonstrations-across-the-country-commemorate-trayvon-martin.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0.
  24. Levin, M. (1960). The Alienated Voter: Politics in Boston. New York: Holt, Rhinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
  25. Levine, K., & Mellema, V. (2001). Strategizing the Street: How Law Matters in the Lives of Women in the Street-Level Drug Economy. Law & Social Inquiry, 26(1), 169–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall, A. (2003). Injustice Frames, Legality, and the Everyday Construction of Sexual Harassment. Law & Social Inquiry, 28(3), 659–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. MOJ. (2017). Legal Problems and Resolution Survey 2014 to 2015. Findings from a Quantitative Survey of Adults’ Experiences of Legal Problems in England and Wales. Ministry of Justice. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/legal-problem-and-resolution-survey-2014-to-2015.
  28. Murphy, K., & Cherney, A. (2012). Understanding Cooperation with Police in a Diverse Society. British Journal of Criminology, 52(1), 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Murphy, K., Tyler, T., & Curtis, A. (2009). Nurturing Regulatory Compliance: Is Procedural Justice Effective When People Question the Legitimacy of the Law? Regulation & Governance, 3(1), 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pleasence, P., Balmer, N., & Sandefur, R. (2016). Apples and Oranges: An International Comparison of the Public’s Experience of Justiciable Problems and the Methodological Issues Affecting Comparative Study. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 13(1), 50–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pound, R. (1906). The Causes of Popular Dissatisfaction with the Administration of Justice. American Law Review, 14, 445–451.Google Scholar
  32. Sagay, A. (2003). What Is Sexual Harassment: From Capitol Hill to the Sorbonne. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. Sarat, A. (1990). “The Law Is All Over”: Power, Resistance and the Legal Consciousness of the Welfare Poor. Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities, 2(2), 343–379.Google Scholar
  34. Southwell, P. (1985). Alienation and Nonvoting in the United States: A Refined Operationalization. Western Political Quarterly, 38(4), 663–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Southwell, P., & Everest, M. (1998). The Electoral Consequences of Alienation: Nonvoting and Protest Voting in the 1992 Presidential Race. The Social Science Journal, 35(1), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Sunshine, J., & Tyler, T. (2003). The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing. Law & Society Review, 37(3), 513–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ter Voert, M., & Klein Haarhuis, C. (2015). Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2014. Over verloop en afloop van (potentieel) juridische problemen van burgers. Den Haag: WODC/Boom Juridische uitgevers.Google Scholar
  38. Tyler, T. (1990). Why People Obey the Law. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Tyler, T., & Huo, Y. (2002). Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
  40. Tyler, T., & Jackson, J. (2013). Future Challenges in the Study of Legitimacy and Criminal Justice. In J. Tankebe & A. Liebling (Eds.), Legitimacy and Criminal Justice: An International Exploration (pp. 83–104). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Tyler, T., & Wakslak, C. (2004). Profiling and Police Legitimacy: Procedural Justice, Attributions of Motive, and Acceptance of Police Authority. Criminology, 42(2), 253–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Van Aelst, P., & Walgrave, S. (2001). Who Is That (Wo)man in the Street? From the Normalisation of Protest to the Normalisation of the Protester. European Journal of Political Research, 39(4), 461–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Van Velthoven, B., & Klein Haarhuis, C. (2010). Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2010. Over verloop en afloop van (potentieel) juridische problemen van burgers. WODC/Boom Juridische uitgevers.Google Scholar
  44. Yagil, D. (1998). Instrumental and Normative Motives for Compliance with Traffic Laws Among Young and Older Drivers. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 30(4), 417–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Zipp, J. (1985). Perceived Representativeness and Voting: An Assessment of the Impact of the “Choices” vs. “Echoes”. American Political Science Review, 79(1), 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Socio-Legal Studies, Faculty of LawUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations