Skip to main content

Weber and Confucius in East Asia: The Great Experiment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Series on Public Policy ((ISPP))

Abstract

As Korea and China have risen as economic powers, scholars from those countries often write about areas of administration considered important by the nations’ political elite. A rise in interest, especially within China, of Confucian approaches to management and perceived conflicts with “Western” approaches mirrors a generational tension between traditional Maoists, and their rejection of Confucian proclivities, and a rising intellectual class, drawn to older indigenous schools of thought. Korea, however, offers Weberian administrative approaches in the classrooms of elite universities, but the administrative culture is strongly influenced by neo-Confucian norms. A comparison of Weber’s outline of ideal types of authority, especially legal-rational, and the logic of “Confucian administrative systems” offers insight into the areas of conflict and highlights the logics of counterpoints to Weber. This approach offers propositions for policy practices in East Asia that attempt to incorporate both East and West.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Adler, J. A. (2011, April 14). Confucianism in China today. Unpublished paper presented at Pearson Living Religions Forum, New York City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt, H. (1958). The human condition. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. N. (1999). Max Weber and world-denying love: A look at the historical sociology of religion. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 67(2), 277–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianco, L. (1971). Origins of the Chinese revolution 1915–1949. Translated by Muriel Bell. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalcraft, D., & Harrington, A. (2001). The protestant ethic debate: Max Weber replies to his critics, 1907–1910 (pp. 89–90). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, F. L. (2001). Equal opportunity? The role of legislation and public policies in women’s employment in China. Women in Management Review, 16(7), 334–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, F. L. (2010). Women’s participation in employment in Asia: A comparative analysis of China, India, Japan and South Korea. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2249–2270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. A. (1977). Masters of sociological thought: Ideas in historical and social context. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenstadt, S. E. (Ed.). (1986). The origins and diversity of axial age civilizations. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, H. G. (2002). Confucius and the moral basis of bureaucracy. Administration and Society, 33, 610–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerth, H. H., & Mills, C. W. (1946). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Oxford: Oxford University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Im, T. B., Campbell, J. W., & Cha, S. Y. (2013). Revisiting Confucian bureaucracy: Roots of the Korean governments’ culture and competitiveness. Public Administration and Development, 33, 286–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaspers, K. (1948). The origin and goal of history. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanthor, R. (2016). Holding up half the sky: Women speak out on the status of feminism in China. TakePart. Participant Media. Retrieved from: http://www.takepart.com/feature/2016/07/29/women-china.

  • Kim, P. S. (2012). A historical overview of Korean public administration: Discipline, education, association, international cooperation, and beyond indigenization. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(2), 217–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1940). Bureaucratic structure and personality. Social Forces, 18(4), 560–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1972). Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology, 78(1), 9–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oakes, G. (2003). Max Weber on value rationality and value spheres. Journal of Classical Sociology, 3(1), 27–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radkau, J. (2011). Max Weber: A biography. Translated from German by Patrick Camiller. Malden, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rarick, C. A. (2007). Confucius on management: Understanding Chinese cultural values and managerial practices. Journal of International Management Studies, 2(2), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, E. (1937). Red star over China. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1954). On law in economy and society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jill L. Tao .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tao, J.L. (2018). Weber and Confucius in East Asia: The Great Experiment. In: Bice, S., Poole, A., Sullivan, H. (eds) Public Policy in the 'Asian Century'. International Series on Public Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60252-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics