Skip to main content
  • 212 Accesses

Abstract

Education is at the core of the struggle for democracy and a new political economy because of its critical role in making people who they are and who they will be in life. Heterodoxy contests the hegemonic political and economic ideology and the legitimacy of privileged groups that dominate Australian politics and economy. A major element is the well-being movement which brought together many Australians who reject the trappings and the social costs of material success exemplified by the ‘ReWorking Australia’ social movement to generate a public debate and activate for the reconstruction of an Australian political economy for the common good. These are joined by the union movement in Australia, which retains a strong core of progressive momentum in promoting economic and political equality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    1. To what extent is an organization like Oxfam Australia part of a social movement for human rights and global justice? Is Oxfam an example of the corporatization of activism? (Dauvergne & LeBaron, 2014). Oxfam’s stated role is to both inform and educate the public, and act as an agent of change. An example is Oxfam’s publication of a report on the harm caused by Australia’s contribution to the World Bank Group’s (WBG) private-sector arm, the International Finance Corporation (IFC). The IFC invests large amounts of public contributors’ money in financial intermediaries such as commercial banks, private equity, and hedge funds. Many such investments cause harm to communities and the environment and the WBG has limited knowledge of where the money ends up (Oxfam, 2015). Oxfam is well known for many local projects it runs in poor countries and its activism in support of workers’ rights in countries supplying goods and services to Australia, making accountable Australian-based companies such as Pacific Brands, Target, Woolworths, Kmart, and others for the garment they import from countries like Bangladesh. Nevertheless, there are many questions about Oxfam’s corporate sponsorships and the role of government in the activities of Oxfam.

References

  • ABC. (2004, February 22). Downshifting. ABC-TV compass. Australian Broadcasting Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, G., Jones, E., & Stilwell, F. (2009). Political economy now! Sydney: Darlington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, D. (2014, December 12). More and lots of it: Neoliberalism resilience in the face of crisis. Progress in Political Economy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dauvergne, P., & LeBaron, G. (2014). Protest, Inc: The corporatization of activism. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (1999, February 24). Economic growth: The dark side of the Australian dream. Paper presented to the Horizons of Science Forum, University of Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (2002). Economics in the age of consumer capitalism. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 50, 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (2003a, March). Downshifting in Australia. The Australia Institute News, 34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (2003b). Growth Fetish. Sydney, Australia: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C. (2006). What’s left? The death of social democracy. Quarterly Essay, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, C., & Mail, E. (2003) Downshifting in Australia. The Australia Institute, Discussion Paper No. 50, January.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, M. (2009). Nurturing activism on campus and beyond. In G. Butler, E. Jones, & F. Stilwell (Eds.), Political economy now! Sydney, Australia: Darlington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam. (2015). The suffering of others: The human cost of the International Finance Corporation’s lending through financial intermediaries. Oxfam Issue Briefing, April. Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panitch, L. (2014). Wheelwright lecture 2014: Whose crisis? Journal of Australian Political Economy, 74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perelman, M. (2015). How economics bolstered power by obscuring it. In State of power 2015. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Transnational Institute. Retrieved from http://www.tni.org.

  • RWA. (1993). The curse of economic rationalism. ReWorking Australia Movement, 1(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, S., & Chester, L. (Eds.). (2014). Challenging the orthodoxy: Reflections on Frank Stilwell’s contribution to political economy. Sydney, Australia: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilwell, F. (1995). Reworking Australia. In S. Rees & G. Rodley (Eds.), The human costs of managerialism. Sydney, Australia: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilwell, F. (2011/12). Marketising the environment. Journal of Australian Political Economy, 68.

    Google Scholar 

  • TAI. (2003). The wellbeing manifesto. Canberra: The Australia Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • TJNA. (2014). Who pays for our common wealth? Tax practices of the ASX 200. Melbourne, Australia: Tax Justice Network Australia.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Paul, E. (2016). Heterodoxy. In: Australian Political Economy of Violence and Non-Violence. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60214-5_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics