Abstract
One of the main challenges of role theory is explaining the choice of a role. Whereas attitudes and preferences are usually used in the literature as “an explanatory complement” to other factors such as the electoral system, it is argued here that MEPs’ preferences are the key to explain their strategies in the Parliament. In order to test this hypothesis, a first section examines whether the roles played by Eurosceptics are influenced by the degree and nature of their Euroscepticism. Alternative hypothesis put forward by the literature are also analysed: the impact of the electoral system as well as the nationality, political affiliation and background of MEPs are indeed tested.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bale, T., & Taggart, P. (2006). First-Timers Yes, Virgins No: The Roles and Background of New MEPs. SEI working papers no. 89.
Beauvallet, W., & Michon, S. (2010). L’institutionnalisation inachevée du Parlement européen. Hétérogénéité nationale, spécialisation du recrutement et autonomisation. Politix, 23(8), 147–172.
Beyers, J. (1998). Where does supranationalism come from? Ideas floating through the working groups of the council of the European Union. EIOP Working Papers, 2(9), 1–25.
Beyers, J. (2010). Conceptual and methodological challenges in the study of European socialization. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 909–920.
Bowler, S., & Farrell, D. (1993). Legislator shirking and voter monitoring: Impacts of European parliament electoral systems upon legislator-voter relationships. Journal of Common Market Studies, 31(1), 45–69.
Bressanelli, E. (2012). National parties and group membership in the European Parliament: ideology or pragmatism? Journal of European Public Policy, 19(5), 737–754.
Crépon, S., Dézé, A., & Mayer, N. (2015). Introduction/Redécouvrir le Front National. In Les fauxsemblants du Front national (pp. 13–24). Presses de Sciences Po (PFNSP).
Deschouwer, K. (2008). “Comparing newly governing parties” dans K. Deschouwer, New Parties in government. In power for the first time, Londres, Routledge, pp. 1–16.
Farrell, D., & Scully, R. (2007). Representing Europe’s citizens? Electoral institutions and the failure of parliamentary representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Farrell, D., & Scully, R. (2010). The European parliament: One parliament, several modes of political representation on the ground? Journal of European Public Policy, 17(1), 36–54.
Georgakakis, D. (Ed.). (2012). Le champ de l’Eurocratie. Une sociologie politique du personnel de l’UE. Paris: Economica.
Hagger, M., & Wing, M. (1979). Legislative roles and clientele orientations in the European parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 4(2), 165–196.
Hix, S., & Hagemann, S. (2009). Could changing the electoral rules fix European parliament elections? Politique européenne, (2), 37–52.
Katz, R. (1999). Role orientations in parliaments. In R. Katz & B. Wessels (Eds.), The European Parliament, the National Parliaments, and European Integration (pp. 61–85). Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Lewis, J. (2005). The Janus face of Brussels: Socialization and everyday decision making in the European Union. International Organization, 599(4), 937–971.
Mughan, A., Box-Steffensmeier, J., & Scully, R. (1997). Mapping legislative socialization. European Journal of Political Research, 32(1), 93–106.
Navarro, J. (2007). Comment le Parlement Européen socialise-t-il les députés européens? Revue française de science politique, 57(1), 94–97.
Navarro, J. (). Les députés européens et leur rôle. Sociologie interprétative des pratiques parlementaires. Brussels: Editions de l’Université de Bruxelles.
Startin, N. (2014). Contrasting fortunes, differing futures? The rise (and fall) of the Front National and the British National Party. Modern & Contemporary France, 22(3), 277–299.
Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2002). The party politics of Euroscepticism in EU member and candidate states. SEI Working Paper, 51.
Szczerbiak, A., & Taggart, P. (2008). Opposing Europe? The comparative party politics of Euroscepticism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wessels, B. (2005). Roles and orientations of members of parliament in the EU context: Congruence or difference? Europeanisation or not? The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11(3–4), 446–465.
Wessels, B., & Giebler, H. (2011). Choosing a style of representation: The role of institutional and organizational incentives. Presentation at the 6th ECPR General Conference, University of Iceland.
Whitaker, R., & Lynch, P. (2014). Understanding the formation and actions of Eurosceptic groups in the European parliament: Pragmatism, principles and publicity. Government and Opposition, 49(2), 232–263.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Brack, N. (2018). Explaining the Roles of Eurosceptic MEPs. In: Opposing Europe in the European Parliament. Palgrave Studies in European Union Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60201-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60201-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-60199-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-60201-5
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)