Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Insights from Key Topics in Sustainable Luxury Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Sustainable Luxury Brands

Part of the book series: Palgrave Advances in Luxury ((PAAL))

  • 2689 Accesses

Abstract

The sixth and last chapter of this book offers readers some knowledge about the state of the art in sustainable luxury research. Since such a research stream is quite broad to be effectively investigated in a book chapter, we had to choose those topics that might be considered as particularly “hot” and relevant in today’s academic and managerial debate. In particular, we chose to shed light on research insights into the following areas: (1) sustainability and innovation, (2) CSR, (3) communication, and (4) cultural differences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source: Interview with Marie-Claire Daveu, Chief Sustainability Officer and Head of International Institutional Affairs of Kering, 2016.

  2. 2.

    With +1200 participants the Copenhagen Fashion Summit is the world’s largest event on sustainability in fashion. It is a non-profit event organized by Danish Fashion Institute on behalf of Nordic Fashion Association (http://www.copenhagenfashionsummit.com/#about).

  3. 3.

    http://luxurysociety.com/news/53318?utm_content=LS_Newsletters&utm_campaign=LS_Newsletters&utm_source=Sendgrid&utm_term=LS_Newsletters&utm_medium=Email

  4. 4.

    Source: Interview with Brunello Cucinelli, Chairman and CEO of the Brunello Cucinelli S.p.A., 2016.

  5. 5.

    Source: Interview with Giovanna Vitelli, Interview with Giovanna Vitelli, member of the Board of Azimut|Benetti Group, 2016.

  6. 6.

    http://www.pradagroup.com/en/group/social-responsibility

  7. 7.

    http://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2016/mar/22/armani-goes-fur-free

  8. 8.

    http://luxurysociety.com/articles/2015/09/the-secrets-to-luxury-online-for-millennials

  9. 9.

    The Luxury Institute and Positive Luxury are two organizations that work with luxury brands. In particular, The Luxury Institute is a consulting company based in New York and founded by Milton Pedraza; this company helps international luxury companies in conducting studies with affluent customers. Positive Luxury is the award winning company behind the Trust Mark; founded by Diana Verde Nieto the company has awarded its “butterfly mark” to hundreds of high-quality brands that integrate sustainability in their whole strategy.

  10. 10.

    Source: Interview with Brunello Cucinelli, Chairman and CEO of the Brunello Cucinelli S.p.A., 2016.

  11. 11.

    Source: Interview with Brunello Cucinelli, Chairman and CEO of the Brunello Cucinelli S.p.A., 2016.

Bibliography

  • Agrawal, N., & Duhachek, A. (2010). Emotional compatibility and the effectiveness of antidrinking messages: A defensive processing perspective on shame and guilt. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(2), 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., & Glavas, A. (2013). Embedded versus peripheral corporate social responsibility: Psychological foundations. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 6(4), 314–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn, S. (2015). The effect of luxury product pricing on consumers’ perceptions about CSR activities. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 19(3), 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amatulli, C., & Guido, G. (2012). Externalised vs. internalised consumption of luxury goods: Propositions and implications for luxury retail marketing. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 22(2), 189–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Peluso, A. M., Soscia, I., Bagozzi, R. P., & Guido, G. (2016a). How to make better consumers in Luxury: The role of shame and empathy. In Rediscovering the essentiality of marketing (pp. 529–533). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Romani, S., & Peluso, A. M. (2016b). The effect of sense of balance on consumers’ decision to purchase sustainable products. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., Pino, G., Mileti, A., & Guido, G. (2016c). Shame and negative word-of-mouth: The differential effect in individualistic vs. collectivistic culture. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aupperle, K. E. (1984). An empirical measure of corporate social orientation. Research in Corporate Social Performance and Policy, 6, 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Pieters, R. (1998). Goal-directed emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 12(1), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, W. O., Netemeyer, R. G., & Teel, J. E. (1989). Measurement of consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Consumer Research, 15(4), 473–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthon, P., Pitt, L., Parent, M., & Berthon, J. P. (2009). Aesthetics and ephemerality: Observing and preserving the luxury brand. California Management Review, 55(1), 45–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. J., & Dacin, P. A. (1997). The company and the product: Corporate associations and consumer product responses. The Journal of Marketing, 61, 68–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International journal of management reviews, 12(1), 85–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989). Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(2), 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chattalas, M., & Shukla, P. (2015). Impact of value perceptions on luxury purchase intentions: A developed market comparison. Luxury Research Journal, 1(1), 40–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chernev, A. (2004). Extremeness aversion and attribute-balance effects in choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(2), 249–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, S. C., & Choi, S. M. (2011). Electronic word-of-mouth in social networking sites: A cross-cultural study of the United States and China. Journal of Global Marketing, 24(3), 263–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2008). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, I. A., Lee, Z., & Ahonkhai, I. (2012). Do consumers care about ethical-luxury? Journal of Business Ethics, 106(1), 37–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M., Adigüzel, F., & Amatulli, C. (2016a). The role of design similarity in consumers’ evaluation of new green products: An investigation of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Cleaner Production, forthcoming.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M., Amatulli, C., & Galatola, R. (2016b). Introducing new sustainable models in the automobile sector. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Angelis, M., Amatulli, C., Romani, S., & Korschun, D. (2016c). CSR dimensions and luxury goods purchase intentions. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Barnier, V., Rodina, I., & Valette-Florence, P. (2006). Which luxury perceptions affect most consumer purchase behavior? A cross-cultural exploratory study in France, the United Kingdom and Russia. Proceedings des Congrés Paris-Venise des Tendences Marketing, Paris, 8–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Hooge, I. E., Zeelenberg, M., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2011). A functionalist account of shame-induced behaviour. Cognition and Emotion, 25(5), 939–946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, R. L., Stuewig, J., & Tangney, J. P. (2005). On the importance of distinguishing shame from guilt: Relations to problematic alcohol and drug use. Addictive Behaviors, 30(7), 1392–1404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekhili, S., & Achabou, M. A. (2016). Is it beneficial for luxury brands to embrace CSR practices? In Celebrating America’s pastimes: Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and marketing? (pp. 3–18). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2007). Reaping relational rewards from corporate social responsibility: The role of competitive positioning. International journal of research in marketing, 24(3), 224–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, B., & Duquesne, P. (1993). The market for luxury goods: Income versus culture. European Journal of Marketing, 27(1), 35–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, B., & Paternault, C. (1997). Does luxury have a home country? An investigation of country images in Europe. Marketing and Research Today, 25(2), 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois, D., Bonezzi, A., & De Angelis, M. (2016). Sharing with friends versus strangers: How interpersonal closeness influences word-of-mouth valence. Journal of Marketing Research, October, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J. K., & Liu, J. (2012). The impact of generational cohorts on status consumption: An exploratory look at generational cohort and demographics on status consumption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(2), 93–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eastman, J. K., Goldsmith, R. E., & Flynn, L. R. (1999). Status consumption in consumer behavior: Scale development and validation. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3), 41–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eteokleous, P. P., Leonidou, L., & Katsikeas, C. (2016). Corporate social responsibility in international marketing: Review, assessment, and future research. International Marketing Review, 33(4), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, C., Prandelli, E., Schreier, M., & Dahl, D. W. (2013). All that is users might not be gold: How labeling products as user designed backfires in the context of luxury fashion brands. Journal of Marketing, 77(5), 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardetti, M. A., & Torres, A. L. (2013). Entrepreneurship, innovation and luxury. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 52, 55–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gazzola, P., & Colombo, G. (2013). Stakeholder engagement between managerial action and communication. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 22(2), 97–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzola, P., & Colombo, G. (2014). CSR integration into the corporate strategy. Cross-Cultural Management Journal, 16(2), 331–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, M. J., Bhawuk, D. P., Nishii, L. H., & Bechtold, D. J. (2004). Individualism and collectivism. In R. J. House, P. J. Hanges, M. Javidan, P. W. Dorfman, & V. Gupta (Eds.), Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies (pp. 437–512). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girón, M. E. (2009). Inside luxury. Madrid: Editorial LID.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girón, M. E. (2016). Sustainable luxury and social entrepreneurship volume II: More stories from the Pioneers. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glavas, A. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and organizational psychology: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griskevicius, V., Van den Bergh, B., & Tybur, J. M. (2010). Going green to be seen: Status, reputation, and conspicuous conservation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(3), 392–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürhan-Canli, Z., & Maheswaran, D. (1998). The effects of extensions on brand name dilution and enhancement. Journal of Marketing Research, 11(1), 464–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, D., Duhachek, A., & Agrawal, N. (2014). Emotions shape decisions through construal level: The case of guilt and shame. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(4), 1047–1064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture’s consequences: international differences in work-related values (Vol. 5). Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hultén, B., Broweus, N., & Van Dijk, M. (2009). What is sensory marketing? In Sensory marketing (pp. 1–23). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, C., Vanhamme, J., Lindgreen, A., & Lefebvre, C. (2013). The catch-22 of responsible luxury: Effects of luxury product characteristics on consumers’ perceptions of fit with corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(1), 45–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalamas, M., Cleveland, M., & Laroche, M. (2014). Pro-environmental behaviors for thee but not for me: Green giants, green Gods, and external environmental locus of control. Journal of Business Research, 67(2), 12–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapferer, J. N. (1998). Why are we seduced by luxury brands? Journal of Brand Management, 6(1), 44–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann, H. R., Vrontis, D., & Manakova, Y. (2012). Perception of luxury: Idiosyncratic Russian consumer culture and identity. European Journal of Cross-Cultural Competence and Management, 2(3–4), 209–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, M. E., Gruenewald, T. L., & Dickerson, S. S. (2004). Shame as the emotional response to threat to the social self: Implications for behavior, physiology, and health. Psychological Inquiry, 15(2), 153–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • KPMG. (2013). The KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2013. http://www.kpmg.com/Global/en/IssuesAndInsights/ArticlesPublications/corporate-responsibility/Documents/corporate-responsibility-reporting-survey-2013-v2.pdf

  • Krishna, A. (2012). An integrative review of sensory marketing: Engaging the senses to affect perception, judgment and behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 332–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kronrod, A., Grinstein, A., & Wathieu, L. (2012). Go green! Should environmental messages be so assertive? Journal of Marketing, 76(1), 95–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, D., Lee, A., & Mizerski, R. (2009). The effects of cultural values in word-of-mouth communication. Journal of International Marketing, 17(3), 55–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laroche, M., Tomiuk, M. A., Bergeron, J., & Barbaro-Forleo, G. (2002). Cultural differences in environmental knowledge, attitudes, and behaviours of Canadian consumers. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 19(3), 267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. S., & Billeter, D. M. (2013). Consumer behavior in “equilibrium”: How experiencing physical balance increases compromise choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 50(4), 535–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laszlo, C., & Zhexembayeva, N. (2011). Embedded sustainability: The next big competitive advantage. Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Cognition and motivation in emotion. American Psychologist, 46(4), 352–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. M., Park, S. Y., Rapert, M. I., & Newman, C. L. (2012). Does perceived consumer fit matter in corporate social responsibility issues? Journal of Business Research, 65(11), 1558–1564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, I. P., Schneider, S. L., & Gaeth, G. J. (1998). All frames are not created equal: A typology and critical analysis of framing effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76(2), 149–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levitt, T. (1993). The globalization of markets. Readings in International Business: A Decision Approach, 1(1), 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. J., & Su, C. (2007). How face influences consumption. International Journal of Market Research, 49(2), 237–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay-Hartz, J. (1984). Contrasting experiences of shame and guilt. The American Behavioral Scientist, 27(6), 689–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipovetsky, G. (1987). L’Empire de l’éphémère: La mode et son destin dans les sociétés modernes. Paris: Editions Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loken, B., & John, D. R. (1993). Diluting brand beliefs: When do have a negative impact? Journal of Marketing, 57(3), 71–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, J. A., & Shrum, L. J. (2001). The influence of individualism, collectivism, and locus of control on environmental beliefs and behavior. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 20(1), 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGuire, J. W. (1963). Business and society. Thousand Oaks: McGraw-hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyers-Levy, J. (2009). Bodily sensations and context effects: The moderating role of physical distance. Asia-Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 8, 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milfont, T. L., Duckitt, J., & Cameron, L. D. (2006). A cross-cultural study of environmental motive concerns and their implications for proenvironmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 38(6), 745–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 195–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mourali, M., Laroche, M., & Pons, F. (2005). Individualistic orientation and consumer susceptibility to interpersonal influence. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(3), 164–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E. S., & Burke, R. J. (2010). Predictor of business students’ attitudes toward sustainable business practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 603–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nwankwo, S., Hamelin, N., & Khaled, M. (2014). Consumer values, motivation and purchase intention for luxury goods. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 21(5), 735–744.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino, G., Amatulli, C., De Angelis, M., & Peluso, A. M. (2016). The influence of corporate social responsibility on consumers’ attitudes and intentions toward genetically modified foods: Eidence from Italy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2861–2869.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podoshen, J. S., Li, L., & Zhang, J. (2011). Materialism and conspicuous consumption in China: A cross-cultural examination. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35(1), 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Millar, V. E. (1985). How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, 63(4), 149–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainey, D. L. (2004). Sustainable development and enterprise management: Creating value through business integration, innovation and leadership. Article presented at Oxford University at its colloquium on Regulating Sustainable Development: Adapting to Globalization in the 21st century, 8–13 August 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rangan, K., Chase, L. A., & Karim, S. (2012). Why every company needs a CSR strategy and how to build it. Harvard Business School working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, M., Terblanche, N., Pitt, L., & Parent, M. (2009). How far can luxury brands travel? Avoiding the pitfalls of luxury brand extension. Business Horizons, 52(2), 187–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roseman, I. J. (1991). Appraisal determinants of discrete emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 5(3), 161–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1993). Studying the emotion-antecedent appraisal process: An expert system approach. Cognition and Emotion, 7(3/4), 325–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlegelmilch, B. B., Bohlen, G. M., & Diamantopoulos, A. (1996). The link between green purchasing decisions and measures of environmental consciousness. European Journal of Marketing, 30(5), 35–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shipilov, A., & Godart, F. (2015). Luxury’s talent factories. Harvard Business Review, 93(6), 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, P. (2011). Impact of interpersonal influences, brand origin and brand image on luxury purchase intentions: Measuring interfunctional interactions and a cross-national comparison. Journal of World Business, 46(2), 242–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla, P., & Purani, K. (2012). Comparing the importance of luxury value perceptions in cross-national contexts. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1417–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soyez, K. (2012). How national cultural values affect pro-environmental consumer behavior. International Marketing Review, 29(6), 623–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankeviciute, R., & Hoffmann, J. (2010). The impact of brand extension on the parent luxury fashion brand: The cases of Giorgio Armani, Calvin Klein and Jimmy Choo. Journal of Global Fashion Marketing, 1(2), 119–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterlacchini, A. (1999). Do innovative activities matter to small firms in non-R&D-intensive industries? An application to export performance. Research Policy, 28(8), 819–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidwell, P., & Dubois, B. (1996). A cross-cultural comparison of attitudes toward the luxury concept in Australia and France. Asia Pacific Advances in Consumer Research, 2, 31–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torelli, C. J., Basu-Monga, S., & Kaikati, A. (2012). Doing poorly by doing good: Corporate social responsibility and brand concepts. Journal of Consumer Research, 38(5), 948–963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Towers, N., Perry, P., & Chen, R. (2013). Corporate social responsibility in luxury manufacturer supply chains: An exploratory investigation of a Scottish cashmere garment manufacturer. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 41(11/12), 961–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211, 453–458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Wal, A. J., van Horen, F., & Grinstein, A. (2016). The paradox of ‘green to be seen’: Green high-status shoppers excessively use (branded) shopping bags. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 33(1), 216–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P. C. (2011). Willingness to pay for organic products: Differences between virtue and vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vigneron, F., & Johnson, L. W. (2004). Measuring perceptions of brand luxury. Journal of Brand Management, 11(6), 484–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virvilaite, R., & Daubaraite, U. (2015). Corporate social responsibility in forming corporate image. Engineering Economics, 22(5), 534–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walton, C. C. (1967). Corporate social responsibilities. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., & Wallendorf, M. (2006). Materialism, status signaling, and product satisfaction. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 494–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartick, S. L., & Cochran, P. L. (1985). The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 758–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R., & Frost, S. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in Asian supply chains. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 13(3), 166–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Windston, A. (2016). Luxury brands can no longer ignore sustainability. Harvard Business Review, February 8. https://hbr.org/2016/02/luxury-brands-can-no-longer-ignore-sustainability

  • Wong, N. Y., & Ahuvia, A. C. (1998). Personal taste and family face: Luxury consumption in Confucian and Western societies. Psychology & Marketing, 15(5), 423–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yim, M. Y.-C., Sauer, P. L., Williams, J., Lee, S. J., & Macrury, I. (2014). Drivers of attitudes toward luxury brands: A cross-national investigation into the roles of interpersonal influence and brand consciousness. International Marketing Review, 31(4), 363–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhan, L., & He, Y. (2012). Understanding luxury consumption in China: Consumer perceptions of best-known brands. Journal of Business Research, 65(10), 1452–1460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Bari, Bari, Italy

    Cesare Amatulli

  2. LUISS University, Rome, Italy

    Michele Costabile

  3. LUISS University, Rome, Italy

    Matteo De Angelis

  4. University of Salento, Lecce, Italy

    Gianluigi Guido

Authors
  1. Cesare Amatulli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michele Costabile
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Matteo De Angelis
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Gianluigi Guido
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Amatulli, C., Costabile, M., De Angelis, M., Guido, G. (2017). Insights from Key Topics in Sustainable Luxury Research. In: Sustainable Luxury Brands. Palgrave Advances in Luxury. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-60159-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation